Fresh Properties and Sulfuric Acid Resistance of Sustainable Mortar Using Alkali-Activated GGBS/Fly Ash Binder

In this study, sorptivity, setting time, resistance to sulfuric acid, and compressive strength of mortars that use alkali-activated GGBS and fly ash as binders, were evaluated experimentally. The activation of binders, was achieved at room temperature of 22 ± 2 °C using combinations of sodium silicates (Na2SiO3) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solutions in ratios of 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5. The parameters considered in terms of their effects on fresh and hardened properties include: NaOH molarity, activator ratio Na2SiO3/NaOH, mortar sample age, and relative amount of GGBS/fly ash in binder combination. Sorptivity, change in mass, and compressive strength were determined for mortar samples that were submerged in 10% sulfuric acid solution for 7 days, 28 days, and 90 days. The binder for mortar samples tested at each of the specified ages consisted of 100% GGBS (G100), 75%GGBS+25% fly ash (G75F25), or 50% GGBS + 50% fly ash (G50F50). The binder was activated using Na2SiO3 solution, combined with 10 M, 12 M, 14 M, or 16 M NaOH solution. It was found that sorptivity decreases with increase in curing age, for all activator ratios, concentrations, and relative amounts of GGBS/fly ash. Binder consisting of 75%GGBS + 25% fly ash with NaOH concentration of 12 M had the lowest sorptivity. Exposure of alkali-activated GGBS/fly ash mortar samples to sulfate attack did not cause loss in mass nor visible signs of damage/deterioration. All binder combinations experienced increase in compressive strength after curing in 10%sufluric acid solution, with the optimum G75F25 mix achieving a 28-day strength of 80.53 MPa when NaOH molarity is 10 M, which increased to 91.06 MPa after 90 days. Variation in concentration of NaOH didn’t cause significant change in the magnitudes of 28-day or 90-day compressive strengths of G50F50. However, despite slow dissolution of fly ash and immersion in 10% sulfuric acid solution, G50F50 developed 28-day compressive strength of 56.23 MPa and 90-day compressive of 86.73 MPa, which qualifies G50F50 as high strength mortar for practical purposes.

[1]  F. Aslani,et al.  Effects of initial SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio and slag on fly ash-based ambient cured geopolymer properties , 2021, Construction and Building Materials.

[2]  Lihai Zhang,et al.  Degradation of Alkali-Activated Slag and Fly Ash Mortars under Different Aggressive Acid Conditions , 2021, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering.

[3]  S. Siddique,et al.  Acid and sulfate resistance of seawater based alkali activated fly ash: A sustainable and durable approach , 2021 .

[4]  J. Kwasny,et al.  Resistance of Alkali-Activated Binders to Organic Acids Found in Agri-Food Effluents , 2021 .

[5]  M. Ati,et al.  Application of Ann for Prediction of Chloride Penetration Resistance and Concrete Compressive Strength , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[6]  Ö. Cizer,et al.  Autogenous shrinkage of slag-fly ash blends activated with hybrid sodium silicate and sodium sulfate at different curing temperatures , 2020 .

[7]  R. Belarbi,et al.  Fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag-based alkali-activated concrete: Mechanical, transport and microstructural properties , 2020 .

[8]  Bing Chen,et al.  Improvement of early strength of fly ash-slag based one-part alkali activated mortar , 2020 .

[9]  C. Shi,et al.  Compressive strength, pore structure and chloride transport properties of alkali-activated slag/fly ash mortars , 2019, Cement and Concrete Composites.

[10]  O. Mohamed.  Effect of Mix Constituents and Curing Conditions on Compressive Strength of Sustainable Self-Consolidating Concrete , 2019, Sustainability.

[11]  Osama Ahmed Mohamed,et al.  A Review of Durability and Strength Characteristics of Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete , 2019, Materials.

[12]  O. Mohamed,et al.  Effect of Curing Methods on Compressive Strength of Sustainable Self-Consolidated Concrete , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

[13]  Phillip Visintin,et al.  Sulphuric acid exposure of conventional concrete and alkali-activated concrete: Assessment of test methodologies , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.

[14]  Guang Ye,et al.  Effect of curing conditions on the pore solution and carbonation resistance of alkali-activated fly ash and slag pastes , 2019, Cement and Concrete Research.

[15]  O. Mohamed.  Durability and Compressive Strength of High Cement Replacement Ratio Self-Consolidating Concrete , 2018, Buildings.

[16]  Tao Yang,et al.  The degradation mechanisms of alkali-activated fly ash/slag blend cements exposed to sulphuric acid , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[17]  H. Lee,et al.  Influence of the slag content on the chloride and sulfuric acid resistances of alkali-activated fly ash/slag paste , 2016 .

[18]  O. Mohamed,et al.  Influence of Fly Ash and Basalt Fibers on Strength and Chloride Penetration Resistance of Self-Consolidating Concrete , 2016 .

[19]  A. Koenig,et al.  Main considerations for the determination and evaluation of the acid resistance of cementitious materials , 2016 .

[20]  H. Brouwers,et al.  Characterization of alkali activated slag–fly ash blends containing nano-silica , 2015 .

[21]  H. Hilbig,et al.  Acid attack on hydrated cement — Effect of mineral acids on the degradation process , 2015 .

[22]  Haeng-Ki Lee,et al.  Shrinkage characteristics of alkali-activated fly ash/slag paste and mortar at early ages , 2014 .

[23]  S. Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of Relationship between Water Absorption and Durability of Concrete Materials , 2014 .

[24]  John L. Provis,et al.  Durability of Alkali‐Activated Materials: Progress and Perspectives , 2014 .

[25]  H. Lee,et al.  Fresh and hardened properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag pastes with superplasticizers , 2014 .

[26]  John L. Provis,et al.  Influence of fly ash on the water and chloride permeability of alkali-activated slag mortars and concretes , 2013 .

[27]  H. Lee,et al.  Setting and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag concrete manufactured at room temperature , 2013 .

[28]  Rupert J. Myers,et al.  X-ray microtomography shows pore structure and tortuosity in alkali-activated binders , 2012 .

[29]  A. Bertron,et al.  Degradation of cement-based materials by various organic acids in agro-industrial waste-waters , 2011 .

[30]  A. K. Parande,et al.  Deterioration of reinforced concrete in sewer environments , 2006 .

[31]  J. Deventer,et al.  Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties , 2005 .

[32]  T. Bakharev,et al.  Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack , 2005 .

[33]  Rd Hooton,et al.  Dependence of rate of absorption on degree of saturation of concrete , 2002 .

[34]  J. Sanjayan,et al.  Microcracking and strength development of alkali activated slag concrete , 2001 .

[35]  Judith J. Stalnaker,et al.  Time Effect of Alkali-Aggregate Reaction on Performance of Concrete , 2001 .

[36]  C. Hall,et al.  Water sorptivity of mortars and concretes: a review , 1989 .

[37]  N. I. Fattuhi,et al.  The performance of cement paste and concrete subjected to sulphuric acid attack , 1988 .

[38]  Kai Yang,et al.  An alternative admixture to reduce sorptivity of alkali-activated slag cement by optimising pore structure and introducing hydrophobic film , 2019, Cement and Concrete Composites.

[39]  D. Law,et al.  The Strength of Alkali-activated Slag/fly Ash Mortar Blends at Ambient Temperature , 2015 .