Angular relationships regulate coordination tendencies of performers in attacker-defender dyads in team sports.

This study examined the continuous interpersonal interactions of performers in dyadic systems in team sports, as a function of changing information constraints. As a task vehicle, we investigated how attackers attained success in 1v1 sub-phases of basketball by exploring angular relations with immediate opponents and the basket. We hypothesized that angular relations would convey information for the attackers to dribble past defenders. Four basketball players performed as an attacker and defender in 1v1 sub-phases of basketball, in which the co-positioning and orientation of participants relative to the basket was manipulated. After video recording performance behaviors, we digitized participant movement displacement trajectories and categorized trials as successful or unsuccessful (from the attackers' viewpoint). Results revealed that, to successfully dribble past a defender, attackers tended to explore the left hand side of the space by defenders by increasing their angular velocity and decreasing their angular variability, especially in the center of the court. Interpersonal interactions and goal-achievement in attacker-defender dyads appear to have been constrained by the angular relations sustained between participants relative to the scoring target. Results revealed the functionality of exploratory behaviors of participants attempting re-align spatial relations with an opponent in 1v1 sub-phases of team games.

[1]  B. Travassos,et al.  Spatiotemporal coordination behaviors in futsal (indoor football) are guided by informational game constraints. , 2012, Human movement science.

[2]  D. Araújo,et al.  Posture-related affordances guide attacks in basketball , 2011 .

[3]  Keith Davids,et al.  Corrigendum to "Informational constraints shape emergent functional behaviors during performance of interceptive actions in team sports" [Psychol Sport Exerc 13 (2012) 216-223] , 2013 .

[4]  M. Raab,et al.  Perspectives on Cognition and Action in Sport , 2009 .

[5]  K. Davids,et al.  Neurobiological Degeneracy and Affordance Perception Support Functional Intra-Individual Variability of Inter-Limb Coordination during Ice Climbing , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  K. Davids The organisation of action in complex neurobiological systems , 2009 .

[7]  K. Davids,et al.  The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport , 2006 .

[8]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Evaluating the Dynamics of Unintended Interpersonal Coordination , 1997 .

[9]  D. Araújo,et al.  Interpersonal coordination and ball dynamics in futsal (indoor football). , 2011, Human movement science.

[10]  Keith Davids,et al.  Interpersonal Pattern Dynamics and Adaptive Behavior in Multiagent Neurobiological Systems: Conceptual Model and Data , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  Keith Davids,et al.  The Role of Ecological Dynamics in Analysing Performance in Team Sports , 2012, Sports Medicine.

[12]  Keith Davids,et al.  Informational constraints shape emergent functional behaviours during performance of interceptive actions in team sports , 2012 .

[13]  E. Brunswik Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments , 1957 .

[14]  D. Araújo,et al.  Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency , 2012 .

[15]  Paul H. Mason,et al.  Degeneracy at Multiple Levels of Complexity , 2010 .

[16]  A. Williams,et al.  Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice , 2005, Sport & Exercise Psychology Review.

[17]  M. L. Tsetlin,et al.  SOME METHODS OF CONTROL FOR COMPLEX SYSTEMS , 1962 .

[18]  Keith Davids,et al.  Interpersonal dynamics and relative positioning to scoring target of performers in 1 vs. 1 sub-phases of team sports , 2012, Journal of sports sciences.

[19]  K. Davids,et al.  Ecological Validity, Representative Design, and Correspondence Between Experimental Task Constraints and Behavioral Setting: Comment on Rogers, Kadar, and Costall (2005) , 2007 .

[20]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[21]  G. Edelman,et al.  Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  S. Bennett,et al.  Emergence of sport skills under constraints , 2004 .

[23]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Contrasting Approaches to Perceiving and Acting With Others , 2006 .

[24]  Keith Davids,et al.  Movement Models from Sports Provide Representative Task Constraints for Studying Adaptive Behavior in Human Movement Systems , 2006, Adapt. Behav..

[25]  K. Davids,et al.  Ecological approaches to cognition and action in sport and exercise: Ask not only what you do, but where you do it , 2009 .

[26]  K. Newell Motor skill acquisition. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  Cristina Fonseca,et al.  Capturing complex human behaviors in representative sports contexts with a single camera. , 2010, Medicina.

[28]  Keith Davids,et al.  The influence of instructions and body-scaling as constraints on decision-making processes in team sports , 2009 .

[29]  G. Ermentrout Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior , 1997 .

[30]  Øyvind Langsrud,et al.  ANOVA for unbalanced data: Use Type II instead of Type III sums of squares , 2003, Stat. Comput..

[31]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Dynamics of Interpersonal Coordination , 2008 .

[32]  J. Gibson The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[33]  J. Kelso,et al.  The Complementary Nature , 2006 .

[34]  P. N. Kugler,et al.  Information, Natural Law, and the Self-Assembly of Rhythmic Movement , 2015 .

[35]  Aidan Moran,et al.  Skill Acquisition in Sport , 2012 .