Legal and ethical aspects of nonreactive social psychological research: an excursion into the public mind.

[1]  D P Schultz,et al.  The human subject in psychological research. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  H. Kelman,et al.  Human use of human subjects: the problem of deception in social psychological experiments. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  David W. Johnson.  Contemporary social psychology , 1973 .

[4]  T. Deiker,et al.  Subject-experimenter perceptions of ethical issues in human research. , 1973, The American psychologist.

[5]  Bibb Latané,et al.  Field studies of altruistic compliance. , 1970 .

[6]  W. Hays.  Statistics for the social sciences , 1973 .

[7]  E. Schaps.  Cost, dependency, and helping. , 1972 .

[8]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  THE EFFECT OF THE EXPERIMENTER ON THE RESULTS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH. , 1964, Progress in experimental personality research.

[9]  I. Silverman.  Nonreactive methods and the law. , 1975, The American psychologist.

[10]  L. Walters,et al.  Some Ethical Issues in Research Involving Human Subjects , 2015, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[11]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Principles of research in social psychology , 1973 .

[12]  D. S. Holmes,et al.  Experiments to answer questions raised by the use of deception in psychological research. I. Role playing as an alternative to deception. II. Effectiveness of debriefing after a deception. 3. Effect of informed consent on deception. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  J. Freedman,et al.  Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  J. G. Adair,et al.  The Human Subject: The Social Psychology of the Psychological Experiment , 1973 .

[15]  W. Seaver,et al.  Stress and discomfort in psychological research: subject perceptions of experimental procedures. , 1975, The American psychologist.

[16]  David L. Wiesenthal,et al.  Effects of deceiving and debriefing psychological subjects on performance in later experiments. , 1970 .

[17]  D. Warwick,et al.  Deceptive research: social scientists ought to stop lying. , 1975, Psychology today.

[18]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  The Volunteer Subject , 1965 .

[19]  Stanley Milgram,et al.  Issues in the study of obedience: A reply to Baumrind. , 1964 .

[20]  Ervin Staub,et al.  Stimulus characteristics of a sufferer and difficulty of escape as determinants of helping. , 1974 .

[21]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  The Volunteer Subject , 1976 .

[22]  P. Zimbardo.  The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. , 1969 .

[23]  Irving Piliavin,et al.  Effect of blood on reactions to a victim. , 1972 .

[24]  Robert P. Abelson,et al.  Negative persuasion via personal insult , 1967 .

[25]  M. Orne.  On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. , 1962 .

[26]  Leonard Bickman,et al.  Beyond the laboratory : field research in social psychology , 1972 .

[27]  K. Gergen.  The codification of research ethics; views of a Doubting Thomas. , 1973, The American psychologist.

[28]  E. Donnerstein,et al.  Some implications for psychological research of early versus late term participation by college subjects , 1974 .

[29]  S. Milgram.  The experience of living in cities. , 1970, Science.

[30]  W. Mcguire.  Some impending reorientations in social psychology: Some thoughts provoked by Kenneth Ring , 1967 .