How Institutional Constraints Affected the Organization of Early U.S. Telephony

Although a great deal of social science research now focuses on institutions, the bulk of this work attempts to explain the emergence and form of particular institutions. Many of these efforts look at the underlying interests that influence the content of, say, a law (e.g., Wilson, 1980; Fligstein, 1990), while other efforts examine properties of the institutions themselves (e.g., Williamson, 1985). With the major exception of efficiency considerations, far less research-indeed, hardly any-examines the actual behavioral consequences of institutions once they are established. Direct investigation of institutional effects often is neglected for theoretical reasons. As Moe (1990: 215) explains, "a theory capable of explaining institutions . . . presupposes a theory of institutional effects." This is so because, "institutions arise from the choices of individuals [who] choose among structures in light of known or presumed effects." If an institution's actual effects coincide with its intended effects, then an explanation of why the

[1]  C. F. Phillips The regulation of public utilities : theory and practice , 1993 .

[2]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Competition and Mutualism among Early Telephone Companies , 1987 .

[3]  G. Carroll,et al.  Telephone and Automobile Diffusion in the United States, 1902-1937 , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  E. E. Zajac,et al.  Dynamics of Organizational populations , 1992 .

[5]  Tsoung-Chao Lee,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Econometrics , 1981 .

[6]  R. Gabel The Early Competitive Era in Telephone Communication, 1893-1920 , 1969 .

[7]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  The Organizational Ecology of a Technological System. , 1990 .

[8]  A. Zellner An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias , 1962 .

[9]  M. Hannan,et al.  Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. , 1986 .

[10]  A. Gouldner Patterns Of Industrial Bureaucracy , 1954 .

[11]  Paul F. Parker Proceedings of Annual Meeting , 1957 .

[12]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[13]  G. Carroll,et al.  Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition.By Michael T. Hannan and Glenn R. Carroll. Oxford University Press, 1992. 286 pp. $29.95 , 1992 .

[14]  R. Merton The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action , 1936 .

[15]  W. Dugger The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[16]  John Brooks,et al.  Telephone: The First Hundred Years , 1976 .

[17]  Neil Fligstein,et al.  FROM THE TRANSFORMATION OF CORPORATE CONTROL , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[18]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[19]  Henry M. Levin,et al.  Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality , 1984 .

[20]  W. Baumol,et al.  Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure , 1982 .

[21]  John W. Meyer,et al.  CENTRALIZATION, FRAGMENTATION, AND SCHOOL DISTRICT COMPLEXITY , 1987 .

[22]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Organizations and the State: Effects of the Institutional Environment on Agricultural Cooperatives in Hungary , 1988 .

[23]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1992 .

[24]  J. W. Stehman The financial history of the American telephone and telegraph company , .

[25]  Terry M. Moe,et al.  Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story , 1990 .

[26]  J. Diamond,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Communities , 1976, Nature.

[27]  O. Williamson The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting , 1985 .

[28]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.