Continuous measurement of fine and ultrafine particulate matter, criteria pollutants and meteorological conditions in urban El Paso, texas

Abstract Continuous measurements of aerosol size distributions were made in El Paso, TX, for a 21 day period in winter 1999. Size distribution measurements were performed at two urban locations in El Paso using two pairs of the scanning mobility particle sizer and the aerodynamic particle sizer. Complementary measurements also were performed for gas phase pollutants (CO, NO, NO 2 , O 3 ) and meteorological conditions. Throughout the study, the mean ultrafine particle (those smaller than 0.1 μm in diameter) number concentration was 14,400 particles cm −3 . There was a significant correlation between CO and both ultrafine and accumulation mode (those between 0.1 and 1 μm in diameter) particle count, with the Pearson correlation coefficient ( r ) values of 0.81 and 0.87, respectively. The correlation between NO and both ultrafine and accumulation mode particle count is also significant, but not as strong as the correlation of CO and the particle concentrations. Most pollutants were found to vary on diurnal cycles and to follow one of two different trends, either vehicular traffic schedules or sunlight intensity. Wind direction was found to have an influence not only on pollutant concentrations, but also on the correlation between pollutants. With southerly winds, CO, NO and NO 2 concentrations were 25–140% greater than when the wind was coming from the north. Likewise, ultrafine and accumulation mode particle concentrations were approximately 100% greater for southerly than for northerly winds.

[1]  M. Väkevä,et al.  Street level versus rooftop concentrations of submicron aerosol particles and gaseous pollutants in an urban street canyon , 1999 .

[2]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .

[3]  J Pekkanen,et al.  Effects of ultrafine and fine particles in urban air on peak expiratory flow among children with asthmatic symptoms. , 1997, Environmental research.

[4]  M. Vana,et al.  Experimental study of the air pollution transport by synchronised monitoring of atmospheric aerosols , 1999 .

[5]  M. Keywood,et al.  Relationships between size segregated mass concentration data and ultrafine particle number concentrations in urban areas , 1999 .

[6]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  Comprehensive characterization of aerosols in a subtropical urban atmosphere : Particle size distribution and correlation with gaseous pollutants , 1998 .

[7]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  The modality of particle size distributions of environmental aerosols , 1999 .

[8]  B. Weiss,et al.  Association of particulate air pollution and acute mortality: involvement of ultrafine particles? , 1995, Inhalation toxicology.

[9]  J. L. Arriaga,et al.  Atmospheric volatile organic compound measurements during the 1996 Paso del Norte Ozone Study. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  Zoran Ristovski,et al.  Relation between particle mass and number for submicrometer airborne particles , 1999 .

[11]  Ilhan Olmez,et al.  Physical and Chemical Characterization of Atmospheric Ultrafine Particles in the Los Angeles Area , 1998 .

[12]  Kaarle Hämeri,et al.  Spatial variation of aerosol number concentration in Helsinki city , 1999 .

[13]  W. Wilson,et al.  Fine particles and coarse particles: concentration relationships relevant to epidemiologic studies. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[14]  Meteorological simulations of boundary-layer structure during the 1996 Paso del Norte Ozone Study. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Dan P. Salgado,et al.  Local meteorological, transport, and source aerosol characteristics of late autumn Owens Lake (dry) dust storms☆ , 1994 .

[16]  R. Harrison,et al.  Continuous measurements of aerosol physical properties in the urban atmosphere , 1999 .

[17]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Measurements of the physical properties of particles in the urban atmosphere , 1999 .

[18]  K. Spurny,et al.  On the physics, chemistry and toxicology of ultrafine anthropogenic, atmospheric aerosols (UAAA): new advances. , 1998, Toxicology Letters.

[19]  Joachim Heinrich,et al.  Comparison of two particle-size spectrometers for ambient aerosol measurements , 2000 .

[20]  Exploratory Studies of PM10 Receptor and Source Profiling by GC/MS and Principal Component Analysis of Temporally and Spatially Resolved Ambient Samples , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[21]  S. Mukerjee,et al.  Selected air quality trends and recent air pollution investigations in the US-Mexico border region. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  A. Peters,et al.  Respiratory effects are associated with the number of ultrafine particles. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[23]  R. J. Huston,et al.  TEXAS NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION , 2002 .

[24]  A. Trier.  Submicron particles in an urban atmosphere: A study of optical size distributions—I , 1997 .

[25]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  A STUDY OF THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL PROFILE OF SUBMICROMETER PARTICLES IN RELATION TO A BUSY ROAD , 1999 .

[26]  E. Fujita,et al.  Hydrocarbon source apportionment for the 1996 Paso del Norte Ozone Study. , 2001, Science of the Total Environment.

[27]  Robert J. Charlson,et al.  The atmospheric aerosol system: An overview , 1983 .

[28]  W. MacNee,et al.  Ultrafine (nanometre) particle mediated lung injury , 1998 .

[29]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  Concentrations of submicrometre particles from vehicle emissions near a major road , 2000 .

[30]  J. Chow,et al.  Analysis of Temporal and Spatial Dichotomous PM Air Samples in the El Paso-Cd. Juarez Air Quality Basin , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[31]  Roy N. Colvile,et al.  Assessing the representativeness of monitoring data from an urban intersection site in central London, UK , 1999 .

[32]  C. Spiegelman,et al.  Applying and developing receptor models to the 1990 El Paso air data: a look at receptor modeling with uncharacterized sources and graphical diagnostics , 1993 .

[33]  F. Lurmann,et al.  Evaluation of the TEOM method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[34]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Measurements of ultrafine particle concentration and size distribution in the urban atmosphere , 1999 .

[35]  L. Neas,et al.  Fine particulate matter and cardiovascular disease , 2000 .

[36]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Significance of particle parameters in the evaluation of exposure-dose-response relationships of inhaled particles , 1996 .

[37]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Source Apportionment of the El Paso Aerosol by Particle Class Balance Analysis , 1988 .

[38]  Paul A. Baron,et al.  Calibration and Use of the Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS 3300) , 1986 .

[39]  J. Finkelstein,et al.  Pulmonary effects induced by ultrafine PTFE particles. , 2000, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[40]  C P MacDonal,et al.  The 1996 Paso del Norte Ozone Study: analysis of meteorological and air quality data that influence local ozone concentrations. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[41]  G. Bishop,et al.  On-Road Remote Sensing of Vehicle Emissions in Mexico , 1997 .

[42]  L R Chinkin,et al.  Compilation and evaluation of a Paso del Norte emission inventory. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[43]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles , 2000, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[44]  Pasi Aalto,et al.  One-Year Data of Submicron Size Modes of Tropospheric Background Aerosol in Southern Finland , 2000 .

[45]  R. Flagan,et al.  Scanning Electrical Mobility Spectrometer , 1990 .

[46]  Da-Ren Chen,et al.  Measurement of Atlanta Aerosol Size Distributions: Observations of Ultrafine Particle Events , 2001 .

[47]  Ken Donaldson,et al.  Education: Ultrafine Particles , 2001 .