LIDAR-DERIVED SITE INDEX IN THE U.S. PACIFIC NORTHWEST - CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

Site Index (SI), a key inventory parameter, is traditionally estimated by using costly and laborious field assessments of tree height and age. The increasing availability of reliable information on stand initiation timing and extent of planted, even-aged stands maintained in digital databases suggests that information on the height of dominant trees suffices for assessing SI. Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is a technology proven capable of providing reliable estimates of tree height even at the individual-tree level. A rigorous evaluation of LiDAR-enabled SI estimation performed on coniferous stands of the coastal U.S. Pacific Northwest indicates that where stand structure and topographic conditions support a high-fidelity assessment of ground elevation, accurate (R 2 _=_0.88) estimates of SI should be anticipated. In more challenging conditions the accuracy of the estimates lessens substantially. A limited evaluation of spatial SI predictions indicates that the distribution of the index might not always conform to the expectations commonly held by forest managers and planners.

[1]  W. W. Carson,et al.  Accuracy of a high-resolution lidar terrain model under a conifer forest canopy , 2003 .

[2]  D. Roberts,et al.  Small-footprint lidar estimation of sub-canopy elevation and tree height in a tropical rain forest landscape , 2004 .

[3]  Randolph H. Wynne,et al.  Estimating plot-level tree heights with lidar : local filtering with a canopy-height based variable window size , 2002 .

[4]  P. Axelsson DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data Using Adaptive TIN Models , 2000 .

[5]  K. O. Niemann,et al.  Local Maximum Filtering for the Extraction of Tree Locations and Basal Area from High Spatial Resolution Imagery , 2000 .

[6]  D. W. MacFarlane,et al.  Population density influences assessment and application of site index , 2000 .

[7]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Predicting site index with a physiologically based growth model across Oregon, USA , 2005 .

[8]  K. Kraus,et al.  Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data , 1998 .

[9]  E. Gustafson,et al.  Predicting the Spatial Distribution of Aspen Growth Potential in the Upper Great Lakes Region , 2003, Forest Science.

[10]  M. E. Dale,et al.  A Gis-derived integrated moisture index to predict forest composition and productivity of Ohio forests (U.S.A.) , 1997, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  Michael Battaglia,et al.  Hybrid growth model to predict height and volume growth in young Eucalyptus globulus plantations , 1999 .

[12]  J. R. Jensen,et al.  Creation of digital terrain models using an adaptive lidar vegetation point removal process , 2002 .

[13]  Tomas Brandtberg Detection and analysis of individual leaf-off tree crowns in small footprint, high sampling density lidar data from the eastern deciduous forest in North America , 2003 .

[14]  Cédric Véga,et al.  Measuring individual tree height using a combination of stereophotogrammetry and lidar , 2004 .

[15]  E. Næsset Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data , 1997 .

[16]  G. Nigh,et al.  How well can we select undamaged site trees for estimating site index , 1999 .

[17]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Elevation accuracy of laser scanning-derived digital terrain and target models in forest environment , 2001 .

[18]  M. Scholes,et al.  Forest site classification and evaluation: a South African perspective , 2002 .

[19]  D. Turner,et al.  Integrating Remote Sensing and Ecosystem Process Models for Landscape- to Regional-Scale Analysis of the Carbon Cycle , 2004 .

[20]  M. Lefsky,et al.  Laser altimeter canopy height profiles: methods and validation for closed-canopy, broadleaf forests , 2001 .

[21]  S. Reutebuch,et al.  A rigorous assessment of tree height measurements obtained using airborne lidar and conventional field methods , 2006 .

[22]  Daniel W. McKenney,et al.  Spatial models of site index based on climate and soil properties for two boreal tree species in Ontario, Canada , 2003 .

[23]  Robert A. Monserud,et al.  Height Growth and Site Index Curves for Inland Douglas-fir Based on Stem Analysis Data and Forest Habitat Type , 1984 .

[24]  M. Hodgson,et al.  An evaluation of LIDAR- and IFSAR-derived digital elevation models in leaf-on conditions with USGS Level 1 and Level 2 DEMs , 2003 .

[25]  B. Zeide,et al.  Selection of site trees: the combined method and its application , 1993 .

[26]  R. Waring,et al.  A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning , 1997 .

[27]  E. Næsset,et al.  Estimating tree height and tree crown properties using airborne scanning laser in a boreal nature reserve , 2002 .

[28]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  The accuracy of estimating individual tree variables with airborne laser scanning in a boreal nature reserve , 2004 .

[29]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  Repetitive interpolation: A robust algorithm for DTM generation from Aerial Laser Scanner Data in forested terrain☆ , 2007 .

[30]  Åsa Persson,et al.  Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner , 2002 .

[31]  F. Ackermann Airborne laser scanning : present status and future expectations , 1999 .

[32]  C. W. Ralston,et al.  Evaluation of Forest Site Productivity , 1964 .

[33]  D. Azuma,et al.  Site index equations and mean annual increment equations for Pacific Northwest Research Station forest inventory and analysis inventories, 1985-2001 / , 2003 .

[34]  Site index charts for Douglas-fir in the Pacific Northwest. , 1958 .

[35]  I. Korpela Individual tree measurements by means of digital aerial photogrammetry , 2004, Silva Fennica Monographs.