University Technology Transfer: How (In-)Efficient are French Universities?

This paper assesses the efficiency of the technology transfer operated by the French university system and its main determinants. The analysis is based on a detailed and original database of 51 TTOs, categorized by type of university, over the period 2003-2007. Overall, we find low-level of efficiency and both intra-category and inter-categories efficiency variation. The analysis of determinants shows that French TTOs efficiency depends extensively on the nature of the category (with universities specialised in science and engineering resulting the most efficient ones), on institutional and environmental characteristics. We found that both the seniority of TTO and size of the university have a positive effect. In terms of environmental variables, the intensity of RD however, in terms of growth rate, only the Private R&D activity seems to be the main driver. Lastly, having a medical school related to a hospital is a source of inefficiency.

[1]  A. Dakar.  MINISTERE DE L'ENSEIGNEMENT SUPERIEUR ET DE LA RECHERCHE , 2013 .

[2]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[3]  Janet Bercovitz,et al.  Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Academic Patent and Licensing Behavior: An Exploratory Study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities , 2001 .

[4]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Testing whether two-stage estimation is meaningful in non-parametric models of production , 2010 .

[5]  Sukanya Kemp,et al.  Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing , 2002 .

[6]  D. Mowery,et al.  Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems , 1995 .

[7]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  The European university landscape: A micro characterization based on evidence from the Aquameth project , 2011 .

[8]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks , 2002 .

[9]  Joshua B. Powers.  Commercializing Academic Research: Resource Effects on Performance of University Technology Transfer , 2003 .

[10]  Patrick Llerena,et al.  Institutional change and academic patenting: French universities and the Innovation Act of 1999 , 2011 .

[11]  Cinzia Daraio,et al.  Universities as Strategic Knowledge Creators: Some Preliminary Evidence , 2007 .

[12]  Cinzia Daraio,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives on University Strategy , 2007 .

[13]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[14]  Leâ Opold Simar,et al.  A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models , 2000 .

[15]  Maureen McKelvey,et al.  What Does it Mean Conceptually that Universities Compete , 2009 .

[16]  Sharon Belenzon,et al.  Harnessing Success: Determinants of University Technology Licensing Performance , 2007 .

[17]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance , 2003 .

[18]  Patrick Llerena,et al.  Indicators of higher-education institutes and public-research organizations technology transfer activities: Insights from France , 2007 .

[19]  Cinzia Daraio,et al.  Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation. Specialization and Performance in Europe , 2007 .

[20]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Towards Evidence-based Reform of European Universities , 2008 .

[21]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[22]  Mike Wright,et al.  ASSESSING THE RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN THE US AND UK: A STOCHASTIC DISTANCE FUNCTION APPROACH , 2008 .

[23]  A. Salter,et al.  Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .

[24]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Advanced Robust and Nonparametric Methods in Efficiency Analysis: Methodology and Applications , 2007 .

[25]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Who is Selling the Ivory Tower , 2000 .

[26]  G. Debreu.  The Coefficient of Resource Utilization , 1951 .

[27]  M. Wright,et al.  Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications , 2007 .

[28]  Joseph Friedman,et al.  University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter? , 2003 .

[29]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[30]  Philippe Larédo,et al.  Innovation and research policy in France (1980-2000) or the disappearance of the Colbertist state , 2002 .

[31]  Patel Parimal,et al.  National Innovation Systems: Why They Are Important, And How They Might Be Measured And Compared , 1994 .

[32]  Jerry G. Thursby,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[33]  Olivier Debande,et al.  Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis , 2010 .

[34]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Non-parametric tests of returns to scale , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Patrick Llerena,et al.  The Evolution of French Research Policies and the Impacts on the Universities and Public Research Organizations , 2003 .

[36]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Generating science-based growth: an econometric analysis of the impact of organizational incentives on university–industry technology transfer , 2005 .

[37]  Mark Schankerman,et al.  Royalty Sharing and Technology Licensing in Universities , 2004 .

[38]  Mike Wright,et al.  Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence , 2005 .

[39]  T. Daim,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer , 2007 .