Improving the electronic health record--are clinicians getting what they wished for?

Pleas for improvement in patient health records date back to Florence Nightingale1 and have persisted well into the 21st century. Computer-based records, currently referred to as electronic health records (EHRs), have been proposed as a means for improving availability, legibility, and completeness of patient information. EHRs have been commercially available since the 1970s, but their adoption has become widespread only recently, driven in part by financial encouragement ($27 billion worth) from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[1]  Lena Mamykina,et al.  Clinical documentation: composition or synthesis? , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  R. Hirschtick,et al.  A piece of my mind. John Lennon's elbow. , 2012, JAMA.

[3]  S. Pitts Higher-complexity ED billing codes--sicker patients, more intensive practice, or improper payments? , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Robert E. Hirschtick Copy-and-Paste , 2006 .

[5]  Charlene R. Weir,et al.  Direct Text Entry in Electronic Progress Notes , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[6]  L. Weed Medical records that guide and teach. , 1968, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  J F Hurdle,et al.  Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors. , 2003, Methods of information in medicine.

[8]  G O Barnett,et al.  The Computer-Based Clinical RecordWhere Do We Stand? , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.