Neural oscillations reflect latent learning states underlying dual-context sensorimotor adaptation

&NA; Recent studies have suggested that individuals can form multiple motor memories when simultaneously adapting to multiple, but oppositely‐oriented perturbations. These findings predict that individuals detect the change in learning context, allowing the selective initialization and update of motor memories. However, previous electrophysiological studies of sensorimotor adaptation have not identified a neural mechanism supporting the detection of a context switch and adaptation to separate contexts. Here, we tested the hypothesis that such a mechanism is identifiable through neural oscillations measured through EEG. Human participants learned to manipulate an object in two opposite contexts (mass distribution). This task was designed based on previous work showing that people can adapt to both contexts. We found that sensorimotor &agr; and &bgr;, and medial frontal &thgr; frequency bands all exhibited different response patterns with respect to the error in each context. To determine whether any frequency's responses to error were distinctly related to a switch in context, we predicted single‐trial EEG data from a computational learning model that can adapt to multiple contexts simultaneously based on a switching mechanism. This analysis revealed that only medial frontal &thgr; was predicted by a component of the model state that adapts to errors based on a context switch. In contrast, &agr; and &bgr; were predicted by a model state that was updated from performance errors independent of the context. These findings provide novel evidence showing that sensorimotor and medial frontal oscillations are predicted by different adaptation processes, and that changes in medial frontal activity may indicate the formation of motor memories by responding to changes in learning context. HighlightsNeural oscillations are proposed as mechanisms for sensorimotor learning.Different frequencies relate to distinct model‐based learning processes and timescales.Medial frontal &thgr; represents changes in learning environment.

[1]  Marco Santello,et al.  Manipulation after object rotation reveals independent sensorimotor memory representations of digit positions and forces. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Luca Bonfiglio,et al.  EEG Theta Dynamics within Frontal and Parietal Cortices for Error Processing during Reaching Movements in a Prism Adaptation Study Altering Visuo-Motor Predictive Planning , 2016, PloS one.

[3]  S. Baker Oscillatory interactions between sensorimotor cortex and the periphery , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[4]  H. Imamizu,et al.  Neural Substrates Related to Motor Memory with Multiple Timescales in Sensorimotor Adaptation , 2015, PLoS biology.

[5]  M. Frank,et al.  Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Motor Planning, Not Execution, Separates Motor Memories , 2016, Neuron.

[7]  E. Procyk,et al.  Anterior cingulate error‐related activity is modulated by predicted reward , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  Thomas F. Münte,et al.  Reduced alpha-gamma phase amplitude coupling over right parietal cortex is associated with implicit visuomotor sequence learning , 2016, NeuroImage.

[9]  Olivier White,et al.  Use-Dependent and Error-Based Learning of Motor Behaviors , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Not All Errors Are Alike: Theta and Alpha EEG Dynamics Relate to Differences in Error-Processing Dynamics , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  J. Artieda,et al.  Beta electroencephalograph changes during passive movements: sensory afferences contribute to beta event-related desynchronization in humans , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  John-Stuart Brittain,et al.  Oscillations and the basal ganglia: Motor control and beyond , 2014, NeuroImage.

[13]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[14]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Cortical electrophysiological network dynamics of feedback learning , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  E. Fetz,et al.  Coherent 25- to 35-Hz oscillations in the sensorimotor cortex of awake behaving monkeys. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  S. Kastner,et al.  Communication between Brain Areas Based on Nested Oscillations , 2017, eNeuro.

[17]  Michael A. DiSano,et al.  Intracranial EEG Reveals a Time- and Frequency-Specific Role for the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus and Primary Motor Cortex in Stopping Initiated Responses , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  D. Nozaki,et al.  Distinct Motor Plans Form and Retrieve Distinct Motor Memories for Physically Identical Movements , 2012, Current Biology.

[19]  M. Kawato,et al.  Explicit contextual information selectively contributes to predictive switching of internal models , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Modeling Single-Trial ERP Reveals Modulation of Bottom-Up Face Visual Processing by Top-Down Task Constraints (in Some Subjects) , 2011, Frontiers in psychology.

[22]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  R. Allan Reese,et al.  Linear Mixed Models: a Practical Guide using Statistical Software , 2008 .

[24]  Maurice A. Smith,et al.  Environmental Consistency Determines the Rate of Motor Adaptation , 2014, Current Biology.

[25]  S. Bressler,et al.  Response preparation and inhibition: The role of the cortical sensorimotor beta rhythm , 2008, Neuroscience.

[26]  Hyuk Oh,et al.  Cerebral cortical dynamics during visuomotor transformation: adaptation to a cognitive-motor executive challenge. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[27]  Scott E Kerick,et al.  Independent component analysis of dynamic brain responses during visuomotor adaptation , 2004, NeuroImage.

[28]  John J. B. Allen,et al.  Prelude to and Resolution of an Error: EEG Phase Synchrony Reveals Cognitive Control Dynamics during Action Monitoring , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Stefan Everling,et al.  Theta-activity in anterior cingulate cortex predicts task rules and their adjustments following errors , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  M. Kawato,et al.  Neural Correlates of Predictive and Postdictive Switching Mechanisms for Internal Models , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Frontal Oscillatory Dynamics Predict Feedback Learning and Action Adjustment , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. , 1997, Science.

[33]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Generalization of Motor Learning Depends on the History of Prior Action , 2006, PLoS biology.

[34]  Christopher K. Kovach,et al.  Neural signatures of perceptual inference , 2016, eLife.

[35]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Failure to Consolidate the Consolidation Theory of Learning for Sensorimotor Adaptation Tasks , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  P. Celnik,et al.  Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[38]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Consolidation in human motor memory , 1996, Nature.

[39]  M. Kawato,et al.  Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  P. Brown,et al.  Post-Movement Beta Activity in Sensorimotor Cortex Indexes Confidence in the Estimations from Internal Models , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  J. Randall Flanagan,et al.  A Single-Rate Context-Dependent Learning Process Underlies Rapid Adaptation to Familiar Object Dynamics , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[42]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Adaptation to Visuomotor Transformations: Consolidation, Interference, and Forgetting , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[44]  Seungjin Choi,et al.  Independent Component Analysis , 2009, Handbook of Natural Computing.

[45]  Marco Santello,et al.  Learned Manipulation at Unconstrained Contacts Does Not Transfer across Hands , 2014, PloS one.

[46]  James F. Cavanagh,et al.  Frontal theta links prediction errors to behavioral adaptation in reinforcement learning , 2010, NeuroImage.

[47]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  A neural microcircuit for cognitive conflict detection and signaling , 2014, Trends in Neurosciences.

[48]  Sarah E. Pekny,et al.  Protection and Expression of Human Motor Memories , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  M. Santello,et al.  Anticipatory Planning and Control of Grasp Positions and Forces for Dexterous Two-Digit Manipulation , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Flavie Torrecillos,et al.  Distinct Modulations in Sensorimotor Postmovement and Foreperiod β-Band Activities Related to Error Salience Processing and Sensorimotor Adaptation , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models , 2013 .

[52]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives , 2000, Nature.

[53]  Luc H. Arnal,et al.  Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  John W Krakauer,et al.  Motor learning and consolidation: the case of visuomotor rotation. , 2009, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[55]  A. G. Witney,et al.  Learning and decay of prediction in object manipulation. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  R. Miall,et al.  Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[57]  A. Engel,et al.  Beta-band oscillations—signalling the status quo? , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[58]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Learning the value of information in an uncertain world , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[59]  C. Tenke,et al.  Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: II. Adequacy of low-density estimates , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[60]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  LFP and oscillations—what do they tell us? , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[61]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Midfrontal conflict-related theta-band power reflects neural oscillations that predict behavior. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[62]  James S. P. Macdonald,et al.  Trial-by-Trial Variations in Subjective Attentional State are Reflected in Ongoing Prestimulus EEG Alpha Oscillations , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[63]  Vincent S. Huang,et al.  Rethinking Motor Learning and Savings in Adaptation Paradigms: Model-Free Memory for Successful Actions Combines with Internal Models , 2011, Neuron.

[64]  Ned Jenkinson,et al.  Dynamic Neural Correlates of Motor Error Monitoring and Adaptation during Trial-to-Trial Learning , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[65]  Marco Santello,et al.  Retention and interference of learned dexterous manipulation: interaction between multiple sensorimotor processes. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[66]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Interacting Adaptive Processes with Different Timescales Underlie Short-Term Motor Learning , 2006, PLoS biology.

[67]  P. Matthews,et al.  Changing brain networks for visuomotor control with increased movement automaticity. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[68]  Gary C. Sing,et al.  Reduction in Learning Rates Associated with Anterograde Interference Results from Interactions between Different Timescales in Motor Adaptation , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[69]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Principles of sensorimotor learning , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[70]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  A memory of errors in sensorimotor learning , 2014, Science.

[71]  P. Brown,et al.  New insights into the relationship between dopamine, beta oscillations and motor function , 2011, Trends in Neurosciences.

[72]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Supplementary Information: Quantifying Generalization from Trial-by-Trial behavior of Adaptive Systems that Learn with Basis Functions , 2003 .

[73]  N. Schweighofer,et al.  Dual Adaptation Supports a Parallel Architecture of Motor Memory , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[74]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  LIMO EEG: A Toolbox for Hierarchical LInear MOdeling of ElectroEncephaloGraphic Data , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[75]  Masaya Hirashima,et al.  Tagging motor memories with transcranial direct current stimulation allows later artificially-controlled retrieval , 2016, eLife.