Inviscid and Viscous CFD Analysis of Booster Separation for the Space Launch System Vehicle

This paper presents details of Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) simulations of the Space Launch System during solid-rocket booster separation using the Cart3D inviscid and Overflow viscous CFD codes. The discussion addresses the use of multiple data sources of computational aerodynamics, experimental aerodynamics, and trajectory simulations for this critical phase of flight. Comparisons are shown between Cart3D simulations and a wind tunnel test performed at NASA Langley Research Center's Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel, and further comparisons are shown between Cart3D and viscous Overflow solutions for the flight vehicle. The Space Launch System (SLS) is a new exploration-class launch vehicle currently in development that includes two Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs) modified from Space Shuttle hardware. These SRBs must separate from the SLS core during a phase of flight where aerodynamic loads are nontrivial. The main challenges for creating a separation aerodynamic database are the large number of independent variables (including orientation of the core, relative position and orientation of the boosters, and rocket thrust levels) and the complex flow caused by exhaust plumes of the booster separation motors (BSMs), which are small rockets designed to push the boosters away from the core by firing partially in the direction opposite to the motion of the vehicle.

[1]  Bandu N. Pamadi,et al.  Aerodynamic Analyses and Database Development for Ares I Vehicle First-Stage Separation , 2012 .

[2]  Thomas H. Pulliam,et al.  Cartesian Off-Body Grid Adaption for Viscous Time- Accurate Flow Simulation , 2011 .

[3]  Jeffrey A. Housman,et al.  Best Practices for CFD Simulations of Launch Vehicle Ascent with Plumes - OVERFLOW Perspective , 2011 .

[4]  David T. Chan,et al.  Space Launch System Booster Separation Aerodynamic Testing in the NASA Langley Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel , 2016 .

[5]  Michael F. Barad,et al.  Aerodynamic Database Generation for SRB Separation from a Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle , 2011 .

[6]  Robert H. Nichols,et al.  Solver and Turbulence Model Upgrades to OVERFLOW 2 for Unsteady and High-Speed Applications , 2006 .

[7]  Jing Pei,et al.  Aerodynamic Modeling and Database Development of the Space Launch System Booster Separation , 2015 .

[8]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  A Parallel Multilevel Method for Adaptively Refined Cartesian Grids with Embedded Boundaries , 2000 .

[9]  Michael J. Aftosmis,et al.  Adjoint Error Estimation and Adaptive Refinement for Embedded-Boundary Cartesian Meshes , 2007 .

[10]  Stuart E. Rogers,et al.  Output-Based Adaptive Meshing Applied to Space Launch System Booster Separation Analysis , 2015 .

[11]  James S. Greathouse,et al.  Rocket Plume Scaling for Orion Wind Tunnel Testing , 2011 .

[12]  David T. Chan,et al.  Space Launch System Booster Separation Aerodynamic Database Development and Uncertainty Quantification , 2016 .

[13]  Stuart E. Rogers,et al.  Effects of Jet-Interaction on Pitch Control of a Launch Abort Vehicle , 2008 .

[14]  Michael J. Aftosmis,et al.  Cart3D Simulations for the Second AIAA Sonic Boom Prediction Workshop , 2017, Journal of Aircraft.