An Experimental Study of Public Information in the Asymmetric Partnership Game

This article analyzes a laboratory experiment on the novel asymmetric partnership game with public information. In this game, two players jointly work on a project each period that only benefits one of them. The public signals are about who is likely to benefit in the future, and the main treatment variable is the informativeness of these signals. Behavior is shown to be best explained by a modification of the basin of attraction (as introduced in Dal Bo and Frechette 2011) to allow for state‐dependent beliefs. The public signals impact choices in the way that this theory predicts, and ultimately there is more effort when signals are more informative. Finally, a new way to investigate strategies in these types of games is considered, and it is shown that different states are used by subjects to use partial effort strategies.

[1]  Majah-Leah V. Ravago,et al.  Intergenerational games with dynamic externalities and climate change experiments ( Running title : Intergenerational games , dynamic externalities ) , 2014 .

[2]  C. Rojas.  The Role of Demand Information and Monitoring on Tacit Collusion , 2010 .

[3]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition , 2000 .

[4]  E. Fehr.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[5]  Guillaume Fréchette,et al.  On the Determinants of Cooperation in Infinitely Repeated Games: A Survey , 2014 .

[6]  Bradley J. Ruffle.  When Do Large Buyers Pay Less? Experimental Evidence , 2009 .

[7]  Andrew Kloosterman.  Public information in Markov games , 2015, J. Econ. Theory.

[8]  G. Spagnolo,et al.  Equilibrium Selection in the Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma: Axiomatic Approach and Experimental Evidence , 2011 .

[9]  Andrew Kloosterman.  Cooperation in stochastic games: a prisoner’s dilemma experiment , 2020, Experimental Economics.

[10]  E. Vespa.  An Experimental Investigation of Strategies in the Dynamic Common Pool Game , 2011 .

[11]  U. Fischbacher.  z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[12]  M. Rabin.  Published by: American , 2022 .

[13]  Guillaume Fréchette,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation in Infinitely Repeated Games: Experimental Evidence , 2011 .

[14]  Nilanjan Roy,et al.  Cooperation Without Immediate Reciprocity: An Experiment in Favor Exchange , 2012 .

[15]  D. Blackwell.  Equivalent Comparisons of Experiments , 1953 .

[16]  Matthias Blonski,et al.  Prisoners’ other Dilemma , 2003, Int. J. Game Theory.

[17]  Luís Cabral,et al.  Intrinsic and instrumental reciprocity: An experimental study , 2014, Games Econ. Behav..

[18]  G. Charness,et al.  Informal Risk Sharing in an Infinite-Horizon Experiment , 2006 .

[19]  Alistair J. Wilson,et al.  Experimenting with the transition rule in dynamic games , 2019, Quantitative Economics.

[20]  D. Blackwell.  Comparison of Experiments , 1951 .

[21]  Alistair J. Wilson,et al.  Dynamic Incentives and Markov Perfection: Putting the 'Conditional' in Conditional Cooperation , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.