Marginal quality of a full-body bulk-fill composite placed with an universal adhesive system in etch-and-rinse and self-etch mode: An in vitrostudy

Background Marginal seal of a nanohybrid bulk-fill composite compared to a nanohybrid conventional composite, using a universal adhesive (UA) applied in etch-and-rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) mode was investigated. Material and Methods Thirty-six intact molars were selected and two standardized cavities in each tooth were prepared and allocated into four groups according to restorative material and etching strategy. All samples were placed in a 1% methylene blue solution for 24 h, then cut in the middle of the restorations obtaining two parts (n=144) and used for microscopic evaluation (50x) for dye penetration measurements. Results The data were analysed by ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test (p<0.05). Marginal seal was influenced by adhesive strategy (p<0.05) but not from the composite used (p>0.05). Conclusions Simplified restorations with nanohybrid bulk-fill composite showed comparable marginal leakage to incrementally placed nanohybrid composite. The UA used with a ER technique resulted in better marginal seal irrespective of the restorative material used. Key words:Bulk-fill composite, universal adhesive, self-etching, etch-and-rinse, marginal seal.

[1]  Katarzyna Lewusz-Butkiewicz,et al.  Marginal integrity of flowable and packable bulk fill materials used for class II restorations -A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. , 2020, Dental materials journal.

[2]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. , 2019, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[3]  R. Haak,et al.  Internal and marginal adaptation of high-viscosity bulk-fill composites in class II cavities placed with different adhesive strategies , 2018, Odontology.

[4]  Tomasz Smektała,et al.  Effects of different etching modes on the nanoleakage of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2018, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[5]  A. Lussi,et al.  Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing. , 2017, Operative dentistry.

[6]  T. Takamizawa,et al.  Effect of double-layer application on bond quality of adhesive systems. , 2018, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[7]  N. Scotti,et al.  New adhesives and bonding techniques. Why and when? , 2017, The international journal of esthetic dentistry.

[8]  U. Pallesen,et al.  Three-year Randomized Clinical Study of a One-step Universal Adhesive and a Two-step Self-etch Adhesive in Class II Composite Restorations. , 2017, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[9]  M. Bandeca,et al.  Influence of Different Etching Modes on Bond Strength to Enamel using Universal Adhesive Systems. , 2016, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[10]  A. Reis,et al.  Influence of Conditioning Time of Universal Adhesives on Adhesive Properties and Enamel-Etching Pattern. , 2016, Operative dentistry.

[11]  T. Takamizawa,et al.  Influence of Etching Mode on Enamel Bond Durability of Universal Adhesive Systems. , 2016, Operative dentistry.

[12]  W. W. Johnson,et al.  Influence of duration of phosphoric acid pre-etching on bond durability of universal adhesives and surface free-energy characteristics of enamel. , 2016, European journal of oral sciences.

[13]  A. Martin,et al.  Monomer conversion, microhardness, internal marginal adaptation, and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill resin composites. , 2015, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  A. Versluis,et al.  Cuspal Flexure and Extent of Cure of a Bulk-fill Flowable Base Composite. , 2015, Operative dentistry.

[15]  J. V. van Dijken,et al.  A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite. , 2015, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[16]  J. Perdigão,et al.  A new universal simplified adhesive: 36-Month randomized double-blind clinical trial. , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[17]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Does active application of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode improve their performance? , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[18]  G. Ametrano,et al.  Marginal Leakage of Class V Composite Restorations Assessed Using Microcomputed Tomography and Scanning Electron Microscope. , 2015, Operative dentistry.

[19]  D. Mclean,et al.  Enamel Bond Strength of New Universal Adhesive Bonding Agents. , 2015, Operative dentistry.

[20]  E. Piva,et al.  Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[21]  S. Heintze,et al.  Marginal Quality of Class II Composite Restorations Placed in Bulk Compared to an Incremental Technique: Evaluation with SEM and Stereomicroscope. , 2015, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[22]  R. Chałas,et al.  Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Four Bulk-Fill Dental Composite Materials: In Vitro Study , 2015, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[23]  U. Pallesen,et al.  Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation. , 2015, Operative dentistry.

[24]  A. Lussi,et al.  Influence of increment thickness on microhardness and dentin bond strength of bulk fill resin composites. , 2014, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[25]  U. Pallesen,et al.  A randomized controlled three year evaluation of "bulk-filled" posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology. , 2014, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[26]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic resin coat. , 2014, Operative dentistry.

[27]  R. Belli,et al.  Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[28]  Hm El-Damanhoury,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics and related properties of bulk-fill resin composites. , 2014, Operative dentistry.

[29]  I. Krejci,et al.  Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[30]  F. Tay,et al.  Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[31]  Nara Hellen Campanha Bombarda,et al.  Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the bonding efficacy of three universal adhesives. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[32]  Frederick A Rueggeberg,et al.  Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composites. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[33]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Universal or Multi-mode Adhesives: Why and How? , 2014, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[34]  D. Paolino,et al.  Microleakage at enamel and dentin margins with a bulk fills flowable resin , 2014, European journal of dentistry.

[35]  M. Carrabba,et al.  Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites. , 2013, American journal of dentistry.

[36]  A. Kakaboura,et al.  Mechanical properties of contemporary composite resins and their interrelations. , 2013, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[37]  Jürgen Durner,et al.  Influence of various irradiation processes on the mechanical properties and polymerisation kinetics of bulk-fill resin based composites. , 2013, Journal of dentistry.

[38]  D Dietschi,et al.  In vitro performance of Class I and II composite restorations: a literature review on nondestructive laboratory trials--part I. , 2013, Operative dentistry.

[39]  A. Mine,et al.  Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. , 2012, Journal of dentistry.

[40]  A. H. Dowling,et al.  Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. , 2012, Journal of dentistry.

[41]  J. Roulet Is in vitro research in restorative dentistry useless? , 2012, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[42]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. , 2011, Journal of dentistry.

[43]  Jack L Ferracane,et al.  Resin composite--state of the art. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[44]  A. Mine,et al.  State of the art of self-etch adhesives. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[45]  S. Duarte,et al.  Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[46]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Influence of the Chemical Structure of Functional Monomers on Their Adhesive Performance , 2008, Journal of dental research.

[47]  S. Heintze,et al.  Microleakage of Class II restorations with different tracers--comparison with SEM quantitative analysis. , 2008, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[48]  A. Glaros,et al.  Properties of silorane-based dental resins and composites containing a stress-reducing monomer. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[49]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro? , 2007, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[50]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[51]  William M Palin,et al.  In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[52]  Jack L Ferracane,et al.  Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[53]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Effects of cavity configuration on composite restoration. , 2004, Operative dentistry.

[54]  G. Fleming,et al.  Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. , 2003, Journal of dentistry.

[55]  M. Noack,et al.  Marginal and internal adaptation of extended class I restorations lined with flowable composites. , 2003, Journal of dentistry.

[56]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. , 2003, Operative dentistry.

[57]  D. Pashley,et al.  Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. , 2001, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[58]  C. Davidson,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[59]  R. Hickel,et al.  Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization'. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[60]  A. Feilzer,et al.  Influence of compliance of the substrate materials on polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[61]  F. Barbakow,et al.  Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. , 1991, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.