Novel extracting methods for conifer stumps

ABSTRACT Stumps can play an important role in providing a renewable raw material for energy generation or biorefining. Currently, it is an underutilized resource in the Scandinavian countries because of the high harvesting cost and contaminant problems of the raw material produced. The objectives of this study were: (1) to evaluate the efficiency and functionality of a forwarder-based stump extraction device that splits and vibrates the stump during lifting, (2) to evaluate the efficiency and functionality of a crawler excavator-based stump lifting device that cuts off the lateral roots and lifts the stump, and (3) to create time consumption models for the aforementioned stump extraction systems based on field studies. Both stump extraction devices operated without any unnecessary delays, as there were no breakdowns but the effective stump harvesting time of the crawler excavator-based extraction device was markedly lower than the time taken by the forwarder-based extraction device. Compared to previous studies, the efficiency of the studied devices (expressed as time consumption per harvested stump) was not competitive relative to the conventional method, in which a crawler excavator is equipped with a stump extraction head that breaks up and lifts the stump and the lateral root system completely.

[1]  Lars Eliasson,et al.  Effects of slash reinforcement of strip roads on rutting and soil compaction on a moist fine-grained soil , 2007 .

[2]  J. Uusitalo,et al.  Variation of the factors affecting soil bearing capacity of ditched pine bogs in Southern Finland , 2015 .

[3]  T. Persson.  Stump harvesting for bioenergy – methods and environmental effects , 2017 .

[4]  Leena Kärkkäinen,et al.  Evaluation of performance of tree-level biomass models for forestry modeling and analyses. , 2005 .

[5]  L. Mehtätalo,et al.  Applying polynomial regression modeling to productivity analysis of sustainable stump harvesting , 2017 .

[6]  Juha Laitila,et al.  Procurement costs of cereal straw and forest chips for biorefining in South-East Finland , 2016 .

[7]  Pentti Hakkila,et al.  Factors driving the development of forest energy in Finland. , 2006 .

[8]  M. Fonseca,et al.  Forest product conversion factors for the UNECE Region. , 2010 .

[9]  Juha Laitila,et al.  The cost competitiveness of conifer stumps in the procurement of forest chips for fuel in Southern and Northern Finland. , 2015 .

[10]  Walter Ammann,et al.  Anchorage of mature conifers: resistive turning moment, root-soil plate geometry and root growth orientation. , 2007, Tree physiology.

[11]  H. Helmisaari,et al.  Increased utilization of different tree parts for energy purposes in the Nordic countries , 2014 .

[12]  Yolanda Ambrosio,et al.  Recovering of forest biomass from Spanish hybrid poplar plantations , 2011 .

[13]  Lars Eliasson,et al.  An alternative supply system for stump biomass – coarse grinding combined with sieving of the produced hog fuel , 2016 .

[14]  Raida Jirjis,et al.  Fuel quality of Norway spruce stumps – influence of harvesting technique and storage method , 2011 .

[15]  D. Bergström,et al.  Effect of stump size and timing of stump harvesting on ground disturbance and root breakage diameter. , 2015 .

[16]  J. Uusitalo,et al.  Impacts of timber forwarding on physical properties of forest soils in southern Finland , 2017 .

[17]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Harvesting and Transport of Root Biomass from Fast-growing Poplar Plantations , 2005 .

[18]  P. Anttila,et al.  Wood extractives of Finnish pine, spruce and birch – availability and optimal sources of compounds , 2017 .

[19]  T. Palander,et al.  Excavator-based harvesters in wood cutting operations in Finland , 2007 .

[20]  R. Lauhanen,et al.  Moisture Content of Norway Spruce Stump Wood at Clear Cutting Areas and Roadside Storage Sites , 2010 .

[21]  J. Uusitalo,et al.  The significance of above-ground biomass, moisture content and mechanical properties of peat layer on the bearing capacity of ditched pine bogs , 2013 .

[22]  Lauri Sikanen,et al.  Feasibility of Excavator-Based Harvester in Thinnings of Peatland Forests , 2004 .

[23]  Matti Sirén,et al.  Equipping a Conventional Wheeled Forwarder for Peatland Operations , 2011 .

[24]  G. Ståhl,et al.  Functions for below-ground biomass of Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Betula pendula and Betula pubescens in Sweden , 2006 .

[25]  P. Saranpää,et al.  Root neck of Norway spruce as a source of bioactive lignans and stilbenes , 2013 .

[26]  Douglas L. Godbold,et al.  Stump Harvesting for Bioenergy - A Review of the Environmental Impacts , 2010 .

[27]  Harri Mäkinen,et al.  Harvesting damage caused by thinning of Norway spruce in unfrozen soil , 2013 .

[28]  Risto Sievänen,et al.  Coarse root architecture of three boreal tree species growing in mixed stands , 2008 .

[29]  Simon Berg,et al.  Technology and systems for stump harvesting with low ground disturbance , 2014 .

[31]  Timo Tokola,et al.  Modelling the stump biomass of stands for energy production using a harvester data management system , 2009 .

[32]  Rolf Björheden,et al.  Drivers behind the development of forest energy in Sweden , 2006 .

[33]  Anders Eriksson,et al.  Simulation-based evaluation of supply chains for stump fuel , 2014 .

[34]  A. Larsolle,et al.  A decision support model for individual tree stump harvesting options based on criteria for economic return and environmental protection , 2017 .

[35]  Tomas Nordfjell,et al.  Forces Required to Vertically Uproot Tree Stumps , 2010 .

[37]  Teijo Palander,et al.  Modeling stump biomass of stands using harvester measurements for adaptive energy wood procurement systems , 2010 .

[38]  Per-Anders Hansson,et al.  Effects of Supply Chain Strategy on Stump Fuel Cost: A Simulation Approach , 2014 .

[39]  Juha Laitila,et al.  Efficiency of Integrated Grinding and Screening of Stump Wood for Fuel at Roadside Landing with a Low-Speed Double-Shaft Grinder and a Star Screen , 2015 .

[40]  H. Latva-Mäenpää.  Bioactive and protective polyphenolics from roots and stumps of conifer trees (Norway spruce and Scots pine) , 2017 .

[41]  Tomas Nordfjell,et al.  Pine and spruce stump harvesting productivity and costs using a Pallari KH 160 stump-lifting tool , 2011 .

[42]  H. Peltola,et al.  Mechanical stability of Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch: an analysis of tree-pulling experiments in Finland , 2000 .

[43]  V. Lazdāns,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY AND COSTS OF STUMP HARVESTING FOR BIOENERGY PRODUCTION IN LATVIAN CONDITIONS , 2009 .

[44]  Risto Ojansuu,et al.  Biomass functions for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch in Finland , 2007 .

[45]  Girma Gebresenbet,et al.  Cleaning of harvested Norway spruce stumps using a vibration-based method , 2013 .

[46]  I. Samset.  Forest operations as a scientific discipline , 1992 .

[47]  Juha Laitila,et al.  Productivity of Stump Harvesting for Fuel , 2008 .

[48]  Juha Laitila,et al.  Comparison of two harvesting methods for complete tree removal on tree stands on drained peatlands , 2013 .

[49]  M. Palviainen,et al.  Stump harvesting in Picea abies stands: Soil surface disturbance and biomass distribution of the harvested stumps and roots , 2018, Forest Ecology and Management.