Quality Measures and The Information Consumer

In recent years the amount of data available to the information consumer has dramatically increased. It is now possible to search for information on an unlimited number of topics across a wide range of information environments. Although plentiful, this information is also of varying levels of quality, being produced both by professionals and those with little or no subject knowledge. As such, it is becoming increasingly difficult to find precisely what is required. The two hurdles that prevent the finding of relevant information are therefore 'information overload' and 'information quality'. Our proposed solution to this problem consists of the development of a methodology for using quality criteria as an aid to information searching. Having previously developed and presented a generic hierarchical framework of quality, and corresponding domain-specific frameworks, we now demonstrate how these models can be used by the information consumer. Using our experimental Information Search Environment the information consumer is able to create a personalised definition of quality, based on the selection of quality criteria, importance weightings, and quality level preference values. This quality definition is then used to focus information searches in their chosen subject domain. In this paper we present our approach, and show how changing this quality definition can alter the results returned from an information search.

[1]  Karl L. Smart,et al.  Assessing quality documents , 2002, AJCD.

[2]  Walker Royce Pragmatic quality metrics for evolutionary software development models , 1990, TRI-Ada '90.

[3]  R. Dromey,et al.  A Model for Software Product Quality , 1995, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[4]  Martin J. Eppler A Generic Framework for Information Quality in knowledge-intensive Processes , 2001 .

[5]  Thomas Redman,et al.  Data quality for the information age , 1996 .

[6]  Felix Naumann,et al.  Quality-Driven Query Answering for Integrated Information Systems , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[7]  Ying Chen,et al.  Query processing with quality control in the World Wide Web , 1998, World Wide Web.

[8]  Alan Matsumura,et al.  Competing with Quality Information , 1996, IQ.

[9]  Eva Gardyn A Data Quality Handbook for a Data Warehouse , 1997, IQ.

[10]  Raymond J. Rubey,et al.  Quantitative measurement of program quality , 1968, ACM '68.

[11]  Mikhaila Burgess,et al.  Establishing a Taxonomy of Quality for Use in Information Filtering , 2002, BNCOD.

[12]  Adenekan Dedeke,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Developing Quality Measures for Information Systems , 2000, IQ.

[13]  Gustavo Rossi,et al.  Specifying Quality Characteristics and Attributes for Websites , 2001, Web Engineering.

[14]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of software quality , 1976, ICSE '76.

[15]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Jennifer Long,et al.  A New Method for Database Data Quality Evaluation at the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) , 2002, ICIQ.

[17]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[18]  Kathleen V. Diegert,et al.  A Hierarchical Approach to Improving Data Quality , 1998, Data Qual..

[19]  Prashant C. Palvia,et al.  Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[20]  Mikhaila Burgess,et al.  A Flexible Quality Framework for Use within Information Retrieval , 2003, ICIQ.

[21]  Felix Naumann,et al.  Assessment Methods for Information Quality Criteria , 2000, IQ.

[22]  Susan Gauch,et al.  Incorporating quality metrics in centralized/distributed information retrieval on the World Wide Web , 2000, SIGIR '00.

[23]  T. Longstaff,et al.  Quality Attributes , 1995 .

[24]  Kecheng Liu,et al.  Quality metrics of object oriented design for software development and re-development , 2000, Proceedings First Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software.

[25]  Holmes Miller,et al.  The Multiple Dimensions of Information Quality , 1996, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[26]  Phillip Cykana,et al.  DoD Guidelines on Data Quality Management , 1996, IQ.

[27]  R. P. Srivastava,et al.  A conceptual framework and belief‐function approach to assessing overall information quality , 2003, Int. J. Intell. Syst..