Integration of aquatic fate and ecological responses to linear alkyl benzene sulfonate (LAS) in model stream ecosystems.

An integrated model stream ecosystem fate and effect study of dodecyl linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (C(12)LAS) was performed in the summer and fall of 1996. The study addressed responses of periphytic microbes, immature benthic fauna including abundance, drift, and emergence of adult insects in a 56-day exposure. Exposures ranged from 126 to 2978 microg/L and were continuously presented in a single-pass, flow-through test system. Microbial heterotrophs acclimated to C(12)LAS exposure quickly (14 days) and biodegraded C(12)LAS at all concentrations. Blue-green algae responded by increasing in abundance with increasing C(12)LAS concentration. Invertebrates responded by increased drift and reduced benthic abundances at concentrations exceeding 293 microg/L. Emergence at 927 microg/L also declined relative to the control. Adverse responses for mayflies and chironomids were indicated using univariate statistical techniques. Multivariate techniques indicated these taxa plus mollusks, aquatic worms, caddisflies, and stoneflies were impaired at some concentrations. Bioavailability of C(12)LAS was investigated in streams as a function of the total suspended solid load in the water column driven by local weather and watershed patterns. A continuous bioavailability model indicated exposure was reduced by an average of 8.5+/-8.9%. A model ecosystem no-observed-effect concentration (NOEC) was concluded to be 293 microg/L based on measured water column exposure and adjusted to 268 microg/L by the bioavailability model. A literature review of 13 available model ecosystem studies was conducted and NOEC conclusions were adjusted by a structure-activity relationship to a dodecyl chain length (sulfophenyl position and distribution being ignored due to lack of information in the reviewed studies). Lentic studies (n=7) were found to have higher NOECs than lotic studies (n=6) and were more variable. Mean NOECs+/-SD for all studies, lentic studies only, and lotic studies only were 3320+/-6040, 5720+/-7640, and 530+/-430 microg/L, respectively. Interpretation of results for anomalies from specific studies suggests the importance of experimental design, use of laboratory versus natural surface water, biological complexity of the test system, and physical test system design as relevant factors for consideration. The specific results of the new model ecosystem study presented in this article can be well defended on the basis of a robust experimental and physical design and because the system contained a diverse and sensitive aquatic community. A low or no uncertainty factor could be applied to the result.

[1]  S. Belanger Literature review and analysis of biological complexity in model stream ecosystems: influence of size and experimental design. , 1997, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[2]  S. Belanger,et al.  Examination of endopelic and epilithic algal community structure employing scanning electron microscopy , 1999 .

[3]  W. Weber,et al.  Effect of solids concentration on the sorptive partitioning of hydrophobic pollutants in aquatic systems. , 1983, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  K. Takamura Chironomids fail to emerge from LAS-contaminated water , 1995, Ecotoxicology.

[5]  J. Elwood,et al.  Extraction with DMSO to simultaneously measure periphyton photosynthesis, chlorophyll, and ATP1,2 , 1987 .

[6]  K. Christoffersen,et al.  Short‐term effects of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate on freshwater plankton studied under field conditions , 2000 .

[7]  L. Wu,et al.  Design of data warehouses using metadata , 2001, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[8]  M. Lewis,et al.  Environmental modification of the photosynthetic response of lake plankton to surfactants and significance to a laboratory-field comparison , 1986 .

[9]  R. Kimerle,et al.  Reduction of aquatic toxicity of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) by biodegradation , 1977 .

[10]  H. L. Boston,et al.  Periphyton Response in an Industrial Receiving Stream: Lipid-based Physiological Stress Analysis and Pattern Recognition of Microbial Community Structure , 1992 .

[11]  Paul J. Van den Brink,et al.  Principal response curves: Analysis of time‐dependent multivariate responses of biological community to stress , 1999 .

[12]  S. Belanger,et al.  Seasonal temperature declines do not decrease periphytic surfactant biodegradation or increase algal species sensitivity. , 1997, Chemosphere.

[13]  D. H. Davidson,et al.  In situ response of natural periphyton to an anionic surfactant and an environmental risk assessment for phytotoxic effects , 1993 .

[14]  Tom C. J. Feijtel,et al.  Predicted no‐effect concentrations and risk characterization of four surfactants: Linear alkyl benzene sulfonate, alcohol ethoxylates, alcohol ethoxylated sulfates, and soap , 1999 .

[15]  K. Cummins,et al.  An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America , 1981 .

[16]  Lawrence A. Baker,et al.  Environmental chemistry of lakes and reservoirs , 1994 .

[17]  E. van Donk,et al.  Sensitivity of macrophyte-dominated freshwater microcosms to chronic levels of the herbicide linuron. I. Primary producers. , 1997, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[18]  Tom C. J. Feijtel,et al.  Exposure modeling of detergent surfactants—prediction of 90th‐percentile concentrations in the Netherlands , 1999 .

[19]  Martin Stafford Holt,et al.  Environmental monitoring for linear alkylbenzene sulfonate, alcohol ethoxylate, alcohol ethoxy sulfate, alcohol sulfate, and soap , 1999 .

[20]  An evaluation of periphyton community structure and function on tile and cobble substrata in experimental stream mesocosms , 1996, Hydrobiologia.

[21]  J. Cairns,et al.  Predicting Ecosystem Risk , 1992 .

[22]  M. Lewis Comparison of the effects of surfactants on freshwater phytoplankton communities in experimental enclosures and on algal population growth in the laboratory , 1986 .

[23]  Scott E. Belanger,et al.  Determination of the sensitivity of macroinvertebrates in stream mesocosms through field‐derived assessments , 1999 .

[24]  Davidson,et al.  Responses of aquatic communities to 25-6 alcohol ethoxylate in model stream ecosystems. , 2000, Aquatic toxicology.

[25]  J. B. Guckert,et al.  Environmental chemistry for a surfactant ecotoxicology study supports rapid degradation of C12‐alkyl sulfate in a continuous‐flow stream Mesocosm , 1996 .

[26]  L. Britton Surfactants and the environment , 1998 .

[27]  W. Guhl Safety evaluation of detergent formulations relevant to the environment , 1999 .

[28]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4) , 1998 .

[29]  I. R. Hill,et al.  Freshwater Field Tests for Hazard Assessment of Chemicals , 1994 .

[30]  F. J. Dwyer,et al.  Evaluation of a laboratory‐generated NOEC for linear alkylbenzene sulfonate in outdoor experimental streams , 1993 .

[31]  R. Sudo,et al.  Environmental assessment of LAS on the aquatic ecosystem using a scale-up system , 1997 .

[32]  H. Könemann Quantitative structure-activity relationships in fish toxicity studies. Part 1: relationship for 50 industrial pollutants. , 1981, Toxicology.

[33]  D. Roberts QSAR issues in aquatic toxicity of surfactants. , 1991, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[35]  S. Dyer,et al.  Removal of alcohol ethoxylates, alkyl ethoxylate sulfates, and linear alkylbenzene sulfonates in wastewater treatment , 1998 .

[36]  J. B. Guckert Toxicity assessment by community analysis , 1996 .

[37]  S. Dyer,et al.  Environmental Behavior and Fate of Anionic Surfactants , 1994 .

[38]  Scott E. Belanger,et al.  Direct and indirect ecotoxicological effects of alkyl sulfate and alkyl ethoxysulfate on macroinvertebrates in stream mesocosms , 1995 .