Well Plate Integrated Topography Gradient Screening Technology for Studying Cell‐Surface Topography Interactions

New high‐throughput technologies for cell–material interaction studies provide researchers with powerful tools to speed up research in the field of biomaterial–cell interactions. However, sharing technologies is often difficult due to the necessity of specific knowledge and experiences. Engineered surfaces can elucidate effects of surface topography on cell behavior, which is of critical value for gaining control over cellular processes. Here, the translation of a gradient‐based high‐throughput cell screening approach for aligned nano/micro topographies interacting with cells is presented. An aligned topography 96‐well plate is created by upscaling of highly specific gradient technology. The resulting cell culture dishes are compatible with general laboratory and imaging equipment, and the platform allows for studying cell behavior with regard to adhesion and alignment. The challenge lies in increasing the dimensions of the previous 1 × 1 cm gradient topography substrate, to be able to cover the span of a 96‐well plate and translate it into a standardized cell‐screening tool. Adhesion experiments of human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells confirm the standardization, compatibility, and usability of the technology. In the process of using multi‐system imaging and analysis, it becomes apparent that future challenges need to include universally applied data analysis approaches.

[1]  Xin Zhao,et al.  Functional and Biomimetic Materials for Engineering of the Three-Dimensional Cell Microenvironment. , 2017, Chemical reviews.

[2]  R. Langer,et al.  Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[3]  Helmut Thissen,et al.  Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to ordered nanotopographies fabricated using colloidal self-assembly and glancing angle deposition. , 2015, Biointerphases.

[4]  Bernke J Papenburg,et al.  TopoWellPlate: A Well‐Plate‐Based Screening Platform to Study Cell–Surface Topography Interactions , 2017, Advanced biosystems.

[5]  Qihui Zhou,et al.  Screening Platform for Cell Contact Guidance Based on Inorganic Biomaterial Micro/nanotopographical Gradients , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[6]  Lassi Paavolainen,et al.  Data-analysis strategies for image-based cell profiling , 2017, Nature Methods.

[7]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  Modulation of osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs cells by submicron topographically-patterned ridges and grooves. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[8]  Akon Higuchi,et al.  Physical cues of biomaterials guide stem cell differentiation fate. , 2013, Chemical reviews.

[9]  Joanna Aizenberg,et al.  Fine-tuning the degree of stem cell polarization and alignment on ordered arrays of high-aspect-ratio nanopillars. , 2012, ACS nano.

[10]  Qihui Zhou,et al.  Directional nanotopographic gradients: a high-throughput screening platform for cell contact guidance , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[11]  R. Lal,et al.  Engineering the cell-material interface for controlling stem cell adhesion, migration, and differentiation. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[12]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Cell Painting, a high-content image-based assay for morphological profiling using multiplexed fluorescent dyes , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[13]  James M. Anderson,et al.  Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. , 2008, Seminars in immunology.

[14]  Robert Langer,et al.  High throughput methods applied in biomaterial development and discovery. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[15]  Matthew J. Paszek,et al.  Balancing forces: architectural control of mechanotransduction , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[16]  Pedro L Granja,et al.  The correlation between the adsorption of adhesive proteins and cell behaviour on hydroxyl-methyl mixed self-assembled monolayers. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[17]  Patrick van Rijn,et al.  Biomaterial–stem cell interactions and their impact on stem cell response , 2014 .

[18]  Denis P. Dowling,et al.  Effect of Surface Wettability and Topography on the Adhesion of Osteosarcoma Cells on Plasma-modified Polystyrene , 2011, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[19]  Jungwook Kim,et al.  Synthetic hydrogels with stiffness gradients for durotaxis study and tissue engineering scaffolds , 2016, Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.

[20]  Larry L Hench,et al.  Third-Generation Biomedical Materials , 2002, Science.

[21]  J. Genzer Surface-Bound Gradients for Studies of Soft Materials Behavior , 2012 .

[22]  Changsheng Liu,et al.  The Horizon of Materiobiology: A Perspective on Material-Guided Cell Behaviors and Tissue Engineering. , 2017, Chemical reviews.

[23]  Hong Yee Low,et al.  Identifi cation of the Optimal Topography for Directing the Differentiation of Primary Murine Neural Progenitor Cells , 2012 .

[24]  Roger J Narayan,et al.  The next generation of biomaterial development , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[25]  B. Geiger,et al.  Environmental sensing through focal adhesions , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[26]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[27]  Ki-Taek Lim,et al.  Synergistic effects of nanotopography and co-culture with endothelial cells on osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[28]  Bernke J Papenburg,et al.  Analysis of high-throughput screening reveals the effect of surface topographies on cellular morphology. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[29]  P. Bonaldo,et al.  Extracellular matrix: A dynamic microenvironment for stem cell niche , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[30]  K. S. Jones,et al.  Effects of biomaterial-induced inflammation on fibrosis and rejection. , 2008, Seminars in immunology.

[31]  M. Foss,et al.  Guidance of stem cell fate on 2D patterned surfaces. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[32]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  An algorithm-based topographical biomaterials library to instruct cell fate , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[34]  Dong Sung Kim,et al.  Fabrication of polystyrene-based multi-well screening platform for micrometer-scale surface topographies promoting stem cell functions , 2017 .

[35]  Michael L. Dustin,et al.  High-Throughput Mechanobiology Screening Platform Using Micro- and Nanotopography. , 2016, Nano letters.

[36]  L. S. Callahan,et al.  Gradient Material Strategies for Hydrogel Optimization in Tissue Engineering Applications. , 2018 .

[37]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels , 2013, Nature materials.

[38]  F. Watt,et al.  Micro-scaled topographies direct differentiation of human epidermal stem cells , 2019, Acta biomaterialia.

[39]  Mengfei Yu,et al.  Surface Atomic Structure Directs the Fate of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[40]  T. Lecuit,et al.  Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[41]  Qihui Zhou,et al.  Double Linear Gradient Biointerfaces for Determining Two‐Parameter Dependent Stem Cell Behavior , 2016 .

[42]  R. Das,et al.  A review of the effects of the cell environment physicochemical nanoarchitecture on stem cell commitment. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[43]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[44]  Huaping Tan,et al.  Gradient biomaterials and their influences on cell migration , 2012, Interface Focus.

[45]  A Curtis,et al.  Topographical control of cells. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[46]  Evren U Azeloglu,et al.  The guidance of stem cell differentiation by substrate alignment and mechanical stimulation. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[47]  Finn Skou Pedersen,et al.  The use of combinatorial topographical libraries for the screening of enhanced osteogenic expression and mineralization. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[48]  Helmut Thissen,et al.  Screening the attachment and spreading of bone marrow-derived and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells on porous silicon gradients , 2012 .

[49]  Nicola Elvassore,et al.  Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction , 2011, Nature.

[50]  Qihui Zhou,et al.  Directional Topography Influences Adipose Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Plasticity: Prospects for Tissue Engineering and Fibrosis , 2019, Stem cells international.

[51]  Morgan R. Alexander,et al.  A High‐Throughput Assay of Cell‐Surface Interactions using Topographical and Chemical Gradients , 2009 .

[52]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity , 2015, Nature materials.

[53]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[54]  Arnold Gillner,et al.  Surface topography enhances differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells towards osteogenic and adipogenic lineages. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[55]  Dennis E Discher,et al.  How deeply cells feel: methods for thin gels , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[56]  Morgan R. Alexander,et al.  Chemical patterning in biointerface science , 2010 .

[57]  R. Langer,et al.  Designing materials for biology and medicine , 2004, Nature.

[58]  Julian H. George,et al.  Exploring and Engineering the Cell Surface Interface , 2005, Science.