A narrative review: current upper limb prosthetic options and design

Abstract Purpose: This review was conducted to provide an overview of current literature as it relates to upper limb difference, available componentry, and prosthetic options and design. Emerging technologies combined with an increased awareness of the limb difference community have contributed to recent advancements in upper extremity prosthetics. Methods: A search of five major clinical databases utilizing keywords relating to upper limb prostheses, componenty and limb difference levels resulted in over 1200 articles. These articles were subjected to inclusion and exclusion criteria in order to identify current peer reviewed research relevant to this topic. Results: Fifty-five applicable articles and sources of standards were reviewed based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, presenting five general options for prosthetic intervention. This information was assimilated and categorized in this article, which provides an overview of the aforementioned options. Conclusion: While a noteworthy amount of research focuses on technological advancements, the five options for prosthetic intervention are inherently represented in the current literature. For individuals with upper limb difference, as well as their care team, successful rehabilitation hinges on awareness of new components, the functional efficacy of these components, and the evolved techniques used in prosthetic design and fabrication. It is noted that the rapid evolution of upper limb prosthetics consistently outpaces research and publication of information. Implications for rehabilitation To provide an overview of prosthetic design considerations and options to help create a more informed rehabilitation team, leading to improved outcomes in prescription and management of upper limb prosthetics. To bring awareness of current research in the field of upper limb prosthetics in order to provoke further exploration of the efficacy of prosthetic options and design considerations.

[1]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  V. Bandela,et al.  Acrylic finger prosthesis: a case report. , 2014, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[3]  Steven S Hsiao,et al.  Sensory feedback for upper limb prostheses. , 2011, Progress in brain research.

[4]  Jason P Carey,et al.  Characterization of interfacial socket pressure in transhumeral prostheses: A case series , 2017, PloS one.

[5]  A. Garg,et al.  Silicone finger prosthesis. A clinical report. , 2012, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[6]  Dick H. Plettenburg,et al.  Bernstein’s Levels of Construction of Movements Applied to Upper Limb Prosthetics , 2012 .

[7]  H Gholizadeh,et al.  An anthropomorphic transhumeral prosthesis socket developed based on an oscillometric pump and controlled by force-sensitive resistor pressure signals , 2017, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[8]  Edward D Lemaire,et al.  Two-degree-of-freedom powered prosthetic wrist. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  Dario J. Villarreal,et al.  Evaluation of transradial body-powered prostheses using a robotic simulator , 2017, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[10]  R. Brånemark,et al.  Osseointegrated prostheses for rehabilitation following amputation , 2017, Der Unfallchirurg.

[11]  Nathan T. Kearns,et al.  Evaluation of Performance‐Based Outcome Measures for the Upper Limb: A Comprehensive Narrative Review , 2018, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[12]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Control Capabilities of Myoelectric Robotic Prostheses by Hand Amputees: A Scientific Research and Market Overview , 2015, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[13]  B. Loeffler,et al.  A Novel Muscle Transfer for Independent Digital Control of a Myoelectric Prosthesis: The Starfish Procedure. , 2019, The Journal of hand surgery.

[14]  Jacob L. Segil,et al.  Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a review. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  R. M. Bongers,et al.  Flexible and static wrist units in upper limb prosthesis users: functionality scores, user satisfaction and compensatory movements , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[16]  Christopher Lake,et al.  The Evolution of Upper Limb Prosthetic Socket Design , 2008 .

[17]  John-John Cabibihan,et al.  Patient-Specific Prosthetic Fingers by Remote Collaboration–A Case Study , 2011, PloS one.

[18]  N. A. Abu Osman,et al.  Kinematic comparison of the wrist movements that are possible with a biomechatronics wrist prosthesis and a body-powered prosthesis: a preliminary study , 2013, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[19]  Kathryn Ziegler-Graham,et al.  Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  David Howard,et al.  The use of an adjustable electrode housing unit to compare electrode alignment and contact variation with myoelectric prosthesis functionality: A pilot study , 2016, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[21]  Marc Thomsen,et al.  Myoelectric hand prostheses in very young children , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[22]  G. Smit,et al.  Efficiency of Voluntary Closing Hand and Hook Prostheses , 2010, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[23]  Sudip Paul,et al.  Recent advancements in prosthetic hand technology , 2016, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[24]  M. Arazpour,et al.  The effect of new method of suspension on quality of life, satisfaction, and suspension in patients with finger prostheses , 2015, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[25]  Lorenzo Leija,et al.  A comparison of direct and pattern recognition control for a two degree-of-freedom above elbow virtual prosthesis , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[26]  Gerwin Smit,et al.  Passive prosthetic hands and tools: A literature review , 2017, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[27]  Robert S Kistenberg,et al.  Prosthetic choices for people with leg and arm amputations. , 2014, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[28]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Treatment of the Partial Hand Amputation: An Engineering Perspective , 2016, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Comparative study of state-of-the-art myoelectric controllers for multigrasp prosthetic hands. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[30]  Wan Abu Bakar Wan Abas,et al.  Kinematic comparison of the wrist movements that are possible with a biomechatronics wrist prosthesis and a body-powered prosthesis: a preliminary study , 2013 .

[31]  Hossein Gholizadeh,et al.  Analysis of voluntary opening Ottobock Hook and Hosmer Hook for upper limb prosthetics: a preliminary study , 2017, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[32]  R. Brent Gillespie,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of Force Feedback in Body-Powered Prostheses , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[33]  Rashmi Uddanwadiker,et al.  Overview: Mechanism and Control of a Prosthetic Arm. , 2015, Molecular & cellular biomechanics : MCB.

[34]  L. Resnik,et al.  Cognitive predictors of skilled performance with an advanced upper limb multifunction prosthesis: a preliminary analysis , 2017, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[35]  H. Burger,et al.  Impact of silicone prosthesis on hand function, grip power and grip-force tracking ability after finger amputation , 2016, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[36]  A. M. Simon,et al.  Patient Training for Functional Use of Pattern Recognition–Controlled Prostheses , 2012, Journal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO.

[37]  S. Hutchins,et al.  Design and fabrication of a finger prosthesis based on a new method of suspension , 2013, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[38]  J.W. Sensinger,et al.  Modeling and Preliminary Testing Socket-Residual Limb Interface Stiffness of Above-Elbow Prostheses , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[39]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  Investigation of a passive capstan based grasp enhancement feature in a voluntary-closing prosthetic terminal device , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[40]  M. J. Highsmith,et al.  Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review. , 2015, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[41]  A. Narayan,et al.  Comprehensive Rehabilitation of Partially Amputated Index Finger with Silicone Prosthesis: A Case Report with 3 years of Follow Up , 2014, Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society.

[42]  Danielle H. Melton Physiatrist Perspective on Upper-Limb Prosthetic Options: Using Practice Guidelines to Promote Patient Education in the Selection and the Prescription Process , 2017 .

[43]  Dick H. Plettenburg,et al.  Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[44]  Sibylle B. Thies,et al.  Corrigendum: The Reality of Myoelectric Prostheses: Understanding What Makes These Devices Difficult for Some Users to Control , 2018, Front. Neurorobot..

[45]  Rinaldo Sacchetti,et al.  Impact of Michelangelo prosthetic hand: Findings from a crossover longitudinal study. , 2015, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[46]  Sibylle B. Thies,et al.  The reality of myoelectric prostheses : understanding what makes , 2018 .

[47]  Caleb J. Behrend,et al.  Update on advances in upper extremity prosthetics. , 2011, The Journal of hand surgery.

[48]  Randall D Alley,et al.  Prosthetic sockets stabilized by alternating areas of tissue compression and release. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[49]  Gerwin Smit,et al.  Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development? , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[50]  Jonathon W Sensinger,et al.  Comparison of body-powered voluntary opening and voluntary closing prehensor for activities of daily life. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[51]  Dick H. Plettenburg,et al.  Ipsilateral Scapular Cutaneous Anchor System: An alternative for the harness in body-powered upper-limb prostheses , 2017, Prosthetics and orthotics international.