An automated technique to categorize storm type from radar and near-storm environment data

Abstract An automated approach to storm classification that relies on identifying storms from observed radar data and classifying them based on their shape, radar, and near-storm environmental parameters is described in this paper. Storms are identified and clustered within CONUS radar and environmental data using a combined watershed segmentation and k-means clustering technique. Storms were manually classified into short-lived convective cells, supercells, ordinary cells, or convective cells at two scales, using data from selected severe weather events between May 2008 and July 2009. Objects of composite reflectivity were identified and tracked using a clustering technique at two spatial scales, and attributes for every storm cluster were extracted based on radar and near-storm environment data from model analysis fields. Quinlan decision trees were trained on these individual attributes and implemented to nowcast storm types for both scales. It is shown in this paper that storms can be automatically identified and classified using a decision tree, and that these automatic classifications have different climatological properties, which are potentially useful for short-term forecasting.

[1]  Valliappa Lakshmanan,et al.  An Efficient , General-Purpose Technique to Identify Storm Cells in Geospatial Images , 2010 .

[2]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project , 1996, Renewable Energy.

[3]  Kenneth W. Howard,et al.  Mesoscale Convective Complexes over the United States during 1985 , 1988 .

[4]  M. C. Llasat,et al.  A methodology for the classification of convective structures using meteorological radar: Application to heavy rainfall events on the Mediterranean coast of the Iberian Peninsula , 2004 .

[5]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[6]  C S Peirce,et al.  The numerical measure of the success of predictions. , 1884, Science.

[7]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[8]  Peter Reutemann,et al.  WEKA Manual for Version 3-6-10 , 2008 .

[9]  C. Morel,et al.  A climatology of mesoscale convective systems over Europe using satellite infrared imagery. I: Methodology , 2002 .

[10]  Robert M. Rabin,et al.  Multiscale storm identification and forecast , 2003 .

[11]  Charles A. Doswell,et al.  Severe Convective Storms—An Overview , 2001 .

[12]  W. Briggs.  Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences , 2007 .

[13]  Arthur Witt,et al.  The Storm Cell Identification and Tracking Algorithm: An Enhanced WSR-88D Algorithm , 1998 .

[14]  Travis M. Smith.  The Use of Radial Velocity Derivatives to Diagnose Rotation and Divergence , 2004 .

[15]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Reduced-error pruning with significance tests , 1999 .

[16]  Paul M. Tag,et al.  Segmentation of Satellite Imagery Using Hierarchical Thresholding and Neural Networks , 1994 .

[17]  Amy McGovern,et al.  Classification of Convective Areas Using Decision Trees , 2009 .

[18]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd Edition , 1999 .

[19]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[20]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[21]  David A. Short,et al.  Nowcasting Thunderstorm Anvil Clouds over Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral Air Force Station , 2004 .

[22]  S. Lakshmivarahan,et al.  Development of an Automated Classification Procedure for Rainfall Systems , 2005 .

[23]  Charles A. Doswell,et al.  On the Environments of Tornadic and Nontornadic Mesocyclones , 1994 .

[24]  Arthur Witt,et al.  A Real-Time, Three-Dimensional, Rapidly Updating, Heterogeneous Radar Merger Technique for Reflectivity, Velocity, and Derived Products , 2006 .

[25]  Charles A. Doswell,et al.  Tornadoes and Toraadic Storms: a Review of Conceptual Models , 2013 .

[26]  Travis M. Smith,et al.  The Warning Decision Support System–Integrated Information , 2007 .