Part 3: Evidence evaluation process: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

[1]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  M. Hazinski,et al.  Part 11: Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. , 2010, Circulation.

[3]  John E Billi,et al.  Part 1: Executive summary: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. , 2010, Circulation.

[4]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  J. Nolan,et al.  Conflict of Interest Management Before, During, and After the 2005 International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations , 2005, Circulation.

[6]  P. Morley Evidence evaluation worksheets: The systematic reviews for the evidence evaluation process for the 2010 International Consensus on Resuscitation Science. , 2009, Resuscitation.

[7]  M. Shuster,et al.  Scientific knowledge gaps and clinical research priorities for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care identified during the 2005 International Consensus Conference on ECC [corrected] and CPR science with treatment recommendations: a consensus statement from the International , 2007, Circulation.

[8]  Julie Glanville,et al.  How to formulate research recommendations , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Michael K Gould,et al.  An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. , 2006, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[10]  I. Scott,et al.  Cautionary tales in the interpretation of systematic reviews of therapy trials , 2006, Internal medicine journal.

[11]  A. Zaritsky,et al.  The evidence evaluation process for the 2005 International Consensus Conference on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. , 2005, Resuscitation.

[12]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group , 2004, BMC health services research.

[13]  M H Weil,et al.  Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: an advisory statement by the advanced life support task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. , 2003, Circulation.

[14]  M. Bracken,et al.  The evidence base for complementary and alternative medicine: methods of Evidence Mapping with application to CAM. , 2003, Alternative therapies in health and medicine.

[15]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement , 2000, Oncology Research and Treatment.

[16]  W. Dick Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care , 2000, Notfall & Rettungsmedizin.

[17]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.

[18]  C. Counsell,et al.  Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.