An Optimization‐based Composite Indicators Approach to Performance Assessment

Composite indicators (CIs) approach has been widely accepted as a useful tool for assessing system performance at macro level. Several recent studies have shown that the weighted product (WP) method, a multiple criteria decision analysis method, may be a good choice in constructing CIs. However, a problem in its application is the subjectivity in determining the weights for sub-indicators. This paper extends the WP method and proposes an optimization-based approach to constructing CIs. The proposed approach requires no prior knowledge of the weights for sub-indicators. The weights used can be generated by solving a series of multiplicative DEA type models that can be transformed into equivalent linear programs. Additional information on the weights can be easily incorporated into the proposed models. A case study on assessing the performance of APEC economies towards sustainable energy development is finally presented to illustrate the use of the approach.

[1]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[2]  Union européenne,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2008 .

[3]  Kin-Nam Lau,et al.  Economic freedom ranking of 161 countries in year 2000: a minimum disagreement approach , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: the case of the Technology Achievement Index , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[5]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators , 2005 .

[6]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Measuring human development via data envelopment analysis: the case of Asia and the Pacific , 2005 .

[8]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Comparing aggregating methods for constructing the composite environmental index: An objective measure , 2006 .

[9]  J. Pastor,et al.  Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: A comparison of European and non-European countries , 1995 .

[10]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  Evaluating the comparative performance of countries of the Middle East and North Africa: A DEA application , 2006 .

[11]  H. Welsch,et al.  Meaningful environmental indices: a social choice approach , 2004 .

[12]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators , 2007 .

[13]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Comparing MCDA Aggregation Methods in Constructing Composite Indicators Using the Shannon-Spearman Measure , 2009 .

[14]  A. Charnes,et al.  A multiplicative model for efficiency analysis , 1982 .

[15]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A note on multi-criteria ABC inventory classification using weighted linear optimization , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  G. Munda “Measuring Sustainability”: A Multi-Criterion Framework , 2005 .

[17]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[18]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Indicators for Assessing Sustainability Performance , 2008 .