The Framing of Nanotechnologies in the British Newspaper Press

This article investigates how developments in nanotechnology were framed in the British national newspaper press during a formative period in their rising public salience. Specifically, an intervention by Prince Charles in April 2003 is shown to have acted as the principal catalyst for much of the ensuing newspaper reporting over the next fifteen months. This study, in taking as its focus the operation of specific news frames, identifies a range of factors that shaped the initial terms of the subsequent debate (between both advocates and critics of nanotechnology) from one newspaper to the next during this period. The analysis suggests that the involvement of a celebrity may play a crucial role in enhancing the newsworthiness of an issue and influencing its subsequent framing in the newspaper press.

[1]  Chris Mooney,et al.  Framing Science , 2007, Science.

[2]  Brenton D. Faber.  Popularizing Nanoscience: The Public Rhetoric of Nanotechnology, 1986–1999 , 2006 .

[3]  Lowndes F. Stephens.  News Narratives about Nano S&T in Major U.S. and Non-U.S. Newspapers , 2005 .

[4]  Science fiction/science fact: medical genetics in news stories , 2005, New genetics and society.

[5]  Lori Baker-Sperry.  Understanding Celebrity , 2005 .

[6]  Patrick Wallis,et al.  Metaphors and Biorisks , 2005 .

[7]  Jonathan Jackson,et al.  Imagining nanotechnology: cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States , 2005 .

[8]  Nanotechnology: and the Media , 2005 .

[9]  Andrea Tanner,et al.  Agenda Building, Source Selection, and Health News at Local Television Stations , 2004 .

[10]  James Wilsdon,et al.  See-Through Science : Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream , 2004 .

[11]  Fred Wester,et al.  Covering Scientific Research in Dutch Newspapers , 2003 .

[12]  M. Huijer.  Reconsidering Democracy , 2003 .

[13]  A. Petersen.  Replicating Our Bodies, Losing Our Selves: News Media Portrayals of Human Cloning in the Wake of Dolly , 2002 .

[14]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  Biotechnology and the American Media , 2002 .

[15]  Stuart Allan,et al.  Media, risk, and science , 2002 .

[16]  P. Conrad,et al.  Constructing the ‘Gay Gene’ in the News: Optimism and Skepticism in the US and British Press , 2001 .

[17]  W. Bainbridge,et al.  Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2001 .

[18]  J. Durant,et al.  The 'great GM food debate': a survey of media coverage in the first half of 1999. , 2000 .

[19]  Stuart Allan,et al.  Environmental risks and the media , 2000 .

[20]  M. Mori,et al.  Medicine, Media, and Celebrities: News Coverage of Breast Cancer, 1960–1995 , 1999 .

[21]  Anders Hansen,et al.  Mass Communication Research Methods , 1998 .

[22]  Simon Cottle,et al.  Mass Communication Research Methods: Introduction , 1998 .

[23]  B. Rothman.  Genetic Maps and Human Imaginations: The Limits of Science in Understanding Who We Are , 1998 .

[24]  Ann C. H. Kindfield,et al.  The dna mystique: the gene as a cultural icon , 1997 .

[25]  Alison Anderson,et al.  Media, Culture And The Environment , 1997 .

[26]  Marianne Pellechia,et al.  Trends in science coverage: a content analysis of three US newspapers , 1997 .

[27]  D. Nelkin,et al.  The DNA Mystique: The Gene As a Cultural Icon , 1995 .

[28]  S. Priest.  Structuring Public Debate on Biotechnology , 1994 .

[29]  K. Schwab,et al.  Public understanding , 1994, Nature.

[30]  D. Nelkin,et al.  Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology by Dorothy Nelkin (review) , 1987, Technology and Culture.

[31]  Todd Gitlin,et al.  The Whole World is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. , 1983 .

[32]  C. Levitt,et al.  "The Whole World Is Watching": Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left , 1981 .

[33]  John Clarke,et al.  Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order , 1978 .