Retrospective motion correction protocol for high‐resolution anatomical MRI

Modern computational brain morphology methods require that anatomical images be acquired at high resolution and with a high signal‐to‐noise ratio. This often translates into long acquisition times (>20 minutes) and images susceptible to head motion. In this study we tested retrospective motion correction (RMC), common for functional MRI (fMRI) and PET image motion correction, as a means to improve the quality of high‐resolution 3‐D anatomical MR images. RMC methods are known to be effective for correcting interscan motion; therefore, a single high‐resolution 3‐D MRI brain study was divided into six shorter acquisition segments to help shift intrascan motion into interscan motion. To help reduce intrascan head motion, each segment image was reviewed for motion artifacts and repeated if necessary. Interscan motion correction was done by spatially registering images to the third image and forming a single average motion‐corrected image. RMC was tested on 35 subjects who were considered at high risk for head motion. Our results show that RMC provided better contrast‐to‐noise ratio and boundary detail when compared to nonmotion‐corrected averaged images. Hum Brain Mapp, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[2]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[3]  S Thesen,et al.  Prospective acquisition correction for head motion with image‐based tracking for real‐time fMRI , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Suzanne E. Welcome,et al.  Mapping cortical change across the human life span , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Kate McLeish,et al.  Free‐breathing radial acquisitions of the heart , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  J. Felmlee,et al.  Orbital navigator echoes for motion measurements in magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  T. Cizadlo,et al.  Quantitative in vivo measurement of gyrification in the human brain: changes associated with aging. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Fadi P. Deek,et al.  Performance Assessment of an Algorithm for the Alignment of fMRI Time Series , 2004, Brain Topography.

[10]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  A tension-based theory of morphogenesis and compact wiring in the central nervous system. , 1997, Nature.

[11]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Age‐related morphology trends of cortical sulci , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[13]  J. Pipe Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: Application to head motion and free‐breathing cardiac imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  V L Morgan,et al.  Comparison of functional MRI image realignment tools using a computer‐generated phantom , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Cortical thickness analysis examined through power analysis and a population simulation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[16]  Kiralee M. Hayashi,et al.  Dynamics of Gray Matter Loss in Alzheimer's Disease , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Henkelman Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. , 1985, Medical physics.

[18]  P. Fox,et al.  Spatial normalization origins: Objectives, applications, and alternatives , 1995 .