Studying the vendor perspective on clinical decision support.

In prior work, using a Rapid Assessment Process (RAP), we have investigated clinical decision support (CDS) in ambulatory clinics and hospitals. We realized that individuals in these settings provide only one perspective related to the CDS landscape, which also includes content vendors and electronic health record (EHR) vendors. To discover content vendors' perspectives and their perceived challenges, we modified RAP for industrial settings. We describe how we employed RAP, and show its utility by describing two illustrative themes. We found that while the content vendors believe they provide unique much-needed services, the amount of labor involved in content development is underestimated by others. We also found that the content vendors believe their products are resources to be used by practitioners, so they are somewhat protected from liability issues. To promote adequate understanding about these issues, we recommend a "three way conversation" among content vendors, EHR vendors, and user organizations.

[1]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Joan S. Ash,et al.  Some Unintended Consequences of Clinical Decision Support Systems , 2007, AMIA.

[3]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[4]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Rapid Assessment of Clinical Information Systems in the Healthcare Setting , 2010, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[5]  David M. Rind,et al.  Association of a clinical knowledge support system with improved patient safety, reduced complications and shorter length of stay among Medicare beneficiaries in acute care hospitals in the United States , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[6]  M. Baba Industry–university relationships and the context of intellectual property dynamics: the case of ibm , 2006 .

[7]  B. Berg Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[8]  H. Bernard,et al.  Techniques to Identify Themes , 2003 .

[9]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[10]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Legal, Ethical, and Financial Dilemmas in Electronic Health Record Adoption and Use , 2011, Pediatrics.

[11]  Diana E. Forsythe,et al.  Ethics and Politics of Studying Up in Technoscience , 1999 .

[12]  James D. Carpenter,et al.  A Rapid Assessment Process for Clinical Informatics Interventions , 2008, AMIA.

[13]  H. Gusterson Studying Up Revisited , 1997 .

[14]  L. Hayden,et al.  Ten Commandments for Effective Clinical Decision Support: Making the Practice of Evidence-based Medicine a Reality , 2011 .

[15]  Adam Wright,et al.  Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  James Beebe,et al.  Rapid Assessment Process: An Introduction , 2001 .