Appropriate Use Criteria for 18F-FDG PET/CT in Restaging and Treatment Response Assessment of Malignant Disease

Precision medicine is evolving to include a variety of data to optimize patient care and improve outcome. Multimodality imaging is paving the way toward this goal. PET/CT with 18F-FDG is now established as an important imaging modality in many clinical conditions, particularly in oncology (1,2). Many tumors demonstrate high glucose metabolism as one of the hallmarks of cancer (3). PET/CT provides combined anatomic and physiologic (glucose metabolism) information that may be used for initial diagnosis, staging, restaging, treatment response assessment, and prognosis in patients with cancer. Moreover, PET information can contribute significantly when other imaging modalities are equivocal. This document describes the appropriate use of PET/CT* in the response assessment and restaging of patients with cancer. Our focus is on common cancers in which the use of PET/CT has been most relevant for clinical practice. Restaging is broadly defined to include the phase of the disease after initial diagnosis and treatment, which may entail local recurrence, distant metastatic disease, and assessment of response to treatments after disease recurrence. The goal of these recommendations is to guide the appropriate use of PET/CT in assessing treatment response after therapy and in evaluating imaging of patients with suspected recurrent cancer. Although the terms response assessment and restaging are frequently used in the discussion of cancer treatment, no consensus definition exists regarding the time frame that differentiates these 2 terms. Indeed, the time interval at which a patient transitions from response assessment to restaging likely varies in relation to tumor biology, therapeutic regimen, and other factors. In this work, the term assessment of response is taken to mean the period in which the intended target of the therapeutic regimen is being evaluated, whereas the term restaging of disease is taken to mean the period in which there is concern for new or progressive disease after completion of prior therapy. This document excludes “initial staging” and “surveillance.” These appropriate use criteria (AUC) are intended to aid referring medical practitioners in the appropriate use of PET/CT for restaging of breast cancer, colorectal cancer, lymphoma, lung cancer, melanoma, sarcoma, and head and neck cancer. Note: The full version of this document, including information on methodology, conflicts of interest, benefits and harms, definition of terms, list of external reviewers, and additional special commentary, is available at http://snmmi.files.cms-plus.com/Quality/ jnm197988_v1.pdf.

[1]  M. Chand,et al.  FDG PET/CT Can Assess the Response of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: Evidence From Meta-analysis and Systematic Review , 2016, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[2]  G. Eslick,et al.  Detecting Residual/Recurrent Head Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas Using PET or PET/CT , 2016, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[3]  C. V. van Eijck,et al.  The accuracy of MRI, endorectal ultrasonography, and computed tomography in predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative therapy: A metaanalysis. , 2016, Surgery.

[4]  Zhou,et al.  Performance of Positron Emission Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Using Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose for the Diagnosis, Staging, and Recurrence Assessment of Bone Sarcoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Erratum , 2016, Medicine.

[5]  Y. Ni,et al.  Prognostic significance of 18FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases: a meta-analysis , 2015, Cancer Imaging.

[6]  D. Rubello,et al.  18F-FDG PET-CT in soft tissue sarcomas: staging, restaging, and prognostic value? , 2015, Nuclear medicine communications.

[7]  Fanxiao Liu,et al.  Performance of Positron Emission Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Using Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose for the Diagnosis, Staging, and Recurrence Assessment of Bone Sarcoma , 2015, Medicine.

[8]  M. Bressel,et al.  Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the accuracy of MRI and endorectal ultrasound in the restaging and response assessment of rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy , 2015, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[9]  Tao Yu,et al.  Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Local Recurrent Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 26 Individual Studies , 2015, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[10]  Eric J. W. Visser,et al.  FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0 , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  Z. Delproposto,et al.  Is diffusion‐weighted MRI superior to FDG‐PET or FDG‐PET/CT in evaluating and predicting pathological response to preoperative neoadjuvant therapy in patients with rectal cancer? , 2014, Journal of digestive diseases.

[12]  R. Wahl,et al.  Head and Neck PET/CT: Therapy Response Interpretation Criteria (Hopkins Criteria)—Interreader Reliability, Accuracy, and Survival Outcomes , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  N. Pastis,et al.  Assessing the usefulness of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT scan after stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. , 2014, Chest.

[14]  M. Haider,et al.  Effect of PET before liver resection on surgical management for colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases: a randomized clinical trial. , 2014, JAMA.

[15]  Wei-min Li,et al.  Diagnostic efficacy of PET and PET/CT for recurrent lung cancer: a meta-analysis , 2014, Acta radiologica.

[16]  Jinhua Zhao,et al.  Predictive value of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography for clinical outcome in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma prior to and after autologous stem cell transplant , 2014, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[17]  Jamie L. Coleman,et al.  The role of PET/CT in assessing pulmonary nodules in children with solid malignancies. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  J. Klode,et al.  18FDG-PET to assess recurrence and long term survival in patients with malignant melanoma , 2013, Nuklearmedizin.

[19]  R. Quirce,et al.  Diagnosis of recurrence and assessment of post-recurrence survival in patients with extracranial non-small cell lung cancer evaluated by 18F-FDG PET/CT. , 2013, Lung cancer.

[20]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Post-therapeutic positron emission tomography/computed tomography for early detection of non-small cell lung cancer recurrence. , 2013, Translational lung cancer research.

[21]  Jiani Hu,et al.  Is there a benefit in using magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer? , 2013, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[22]  Toshio Ohashi,et al.  Evaluation for local failure by 18F-FDG PET/CT in comparison with CT findings after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2013, Lung cancer.

[23]  C. Chien,et al.  Use of FDG-PET or PET/CT to detect recurrent colorectal cancer in patients with elevated CEA: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[24]  Andreas Rimner,et al.  Role of FDG-PET scans in staging, response assessment, and follow-up care for non-small cell lung cancer , 2013, Front. Oncol..

[25]  Shaoli Song,et al.  18F-FDG-PET evaluation of pathological tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with NSCLC , 2013, Nuclear medicine communications.

[26]  Lin Zhao,et al.  Performance of Whole-Body PET/CT for the Detection of Distant Malignancies in Various Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  Liu Hongtao,et al.  18F-FDG positron emission tomography for the assessment of histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcomas: a meta-analysis. , 2012, Surgical oncology.

[28]  J. Pou Ucha,et al.  Diagnostic yield of baseline and follow-up PET/CT studies in ablative therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. , 2012, Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular.

[29]  A. Tangoku,et al.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography is useful in postoperative follow-up of asymptomatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients. , 2012, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[30]  P. Ziakas,et al.  FDG-PET for detecting local tumor recurrence of ablated liver metastases: a diagnostic meta-analysis , 2012, Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals.

[31]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Positron emission tomography for assessing local failure after stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[32]  M. Gregianin,et al.  Comparison of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography and computed tomography in patients with already-treated breast cancer: diagnostic and prognostic implications. , 2012, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[33]  A. Abernethy,et al.  A Multicenter Prospective Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of F-18 FDG-PET/CT in Patients With AJCC Stage IIIB or IIIC Extremity Melanoma , 2012, Annals of surgery.

[34]  A. Bhattacharya,et al.  Clinical utility of F-18 FDG PET/CT in recurrent breast carcinoma , 2012, Nuclear medicine communications.

[35]  Xiaoguang Sun,et al.  18F‐FDG‐PET evaluation of treatment response to neo‐adjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: A meta‐analysis , 2012, International journal of cancer.

[36]  Xu Cheng,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT and PET for evaluation of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis , 2012, Acta radiologica.

[37]  M. A. van den Bosch,et al.  Preoperative Imaging of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Meta-Analysis , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[38]  E. V. Beek,et al.  Integrated imaging of non-small cell lung cancer recurrence: CT and PET-CT findings, possible pitfalls and risk of recurrence criteria , 2012, European Radiology.

[39]  S. Fanti,et al.  FDG PET/CT predictive role in follicular lymphoma , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[40]  J. Goo,et al.  Positron emission tomography-computed tomography for postoperative surveillance in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[41]  A. Ciarmiello,et al.  Targeted-therapy and imaging response: a new paradigm for clinical evaluation? , 2011, Reviews on recent clinical trials.

[42]  S. Hillman,et al.  Radiofrequency ablation of medically inoperable stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: are early posttreatment PET findings predictive of treatment outcome? , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[43]  Hui-lin Yang,et al.  Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer: which one is the best?--a meta-analysis. , 2011, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[44]  E. Brain,et al.  Breast cancer recurrence diagnosis suspected on tumor marker rising , 2011, Cancer.

[45]  G. Beets,et al.  What is the most accurate whole-body imaging modality for assessment of local and distant recurrent disease in colorectal cancer? A meta-analysis , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[46]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[47]  P. Choong,et al.  18F-FDG PET response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma are different , 2011, Skeletal Radiology.

[48]  Masahiro Tsuboi,et al.  International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[49]  Yan Xing,et al.  Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients: a meta-analysis. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[50]  J. Stoker,et al.  Diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases with CT, MR imaging, FDG PET, and/or FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis of prospective studies including patients who have not previously undergone treatment. , 2010, Radiology.

[51]  F. Mottaghy,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Hybrid PET/CT for Staging of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[52]  Theodoros N. Arvanitis,et al.  A systematic review of positron emission tomography (PET) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence. , 2010, Health technology assessment.

[53]  R. Houot,et al.  Diagnostic and prognostic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in follicular lymphoma , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[54]  M. Mayerhoefer,et al.  Integrated contrast-enhanced diagnostic whole-body PET/CT as a first-line restaging modality in patients with suspected metastatic recurrence of breast cancer. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[55]  V. Torri,et al.  Performance of imaging modalities in diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[56]  J. Eary,et al.  [F‐18]‐fluorodeoxy‐D‐glucose–positron emission tomography response is associated with outcome for extremity osteosarcoma in children and young adults , 2009, Cancer.

[57]  W. Oyen,et al.  Improved Selection of Patients for Hepatic Surgery of Colorectal Liver Metastases with 18F-FDG PET: A Randomized Study , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[58]  Sang-Won Um,et al.  The Role of Whole-Body FDG PET/CT, Tc 99m MDP Bone Scintigraphy, and Serum Alkaline Phosphatase in Detecting Bone Metastasis in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Lung Cancer , 2009, Journal of Korean medical science.

[59]  P. Lambin,et al.  Follow-up with 18FDG-PET-CT after radical radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy allows the detection of potentially curable progressive disease in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a prospective study. , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[60]  A. Alavi,et al.  Unparalleled contribution of 18F-FDG PET to medicine over 3 decades. , 2008, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[61]  J. Choi,et al.  Non-small cell lung cancer staging: efficacy comparison of integrated PET/CT versus 3.0-T whole-body MR imaging. , 2008, Radiology.

[62]  C. McConkey,et al.  A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the role of positron emission tomography in the follow up of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma following radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy , 2008, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[63]  C. Claussen,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staging of Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer—Initial Results , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[64]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) , 2007, PloS one.

[65]  L. Quint Staging non-small cell lung cancer* , 2007, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[66]  M. Kurrer,et al.  Hodgkin disease: diagnostic value of FDG PET/CT after first-line therapy--is biopsy of FDG-avid lesions still needed? , 2007, Radiology.

[67]  T. Beyer,et al.  FDG-PET/CT in restaging of patients with recurrent breast cancer: possible impact on staging and therapy. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[68]  A. Figer,et al.  The Role and Limitations of 18-Fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) Scan and Computerized Tomography (CT) in Restaging Patients with Hepatic Colorectal Metastases Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Comparison with Operative and Pathological Findings , 2007, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[69]  H. Hansen,et al.  A prospective study of PET/CT in initial staging of small-cell lung cancer: comparison with CT, bone scintigraphy and bone marrow analysis. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[70]  R. Tiling,et al.  Value of PET/CT versus PET and CT performed as separate investigations in patients with Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[71]  R. Cerfolio,et al.  Restaging patients with N2 (stage IIIa) non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a prospective study. , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[72]  W. Martin,et al.  Utility of FDG-PET/CT in Follow-Up of Children Treated for Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma , 2006, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[73]  S. Larson,et al.  Recent chemotherapy reduces the sensitivity of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the detection of colorectal metastases. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[74]  R. Timmerman,et al.  FDG-PET and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2005, Lung cancer.

[75]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis--meta-analysis. , 2005, Radiology.

[76]  D. Dupuy,et al.  CT imaging findings of pulmonary neoplasms after treatment with radiofrequency ablation: results in 32 tumors. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[77]  A. Alavi,et al.  18F-FDG PET in evaluation of adrenal lesions in patients with lung cancer. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[78]  Alfred A Bartolucci,et al.  The accuracy of integrated PET-CT compared with dedicated PET alone for the staging of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[79]  C. Dooms,et al.  Positron-emission tomography in prognostic and therapeutic assessment of lung cancer: systematic review. , 2004, The Lancet. Oncology.

[80]  J. Herndon,et al.  Comparison of whole-body FDG-PET to bone scan for detection of bone metastases in patients with a new diagnosis of lung cancer. , 2004, Lung cancer.

[81]  S. Varadarajulu,et al.  Endoscopic ultrasound in lung cancer patients with a normal mediastinum on computed tomography. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[82]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  FDG-PET/CT in re-staging of patients with lymphoma , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[83]  A. Ellis Breast , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[84]  P. V. Van Schil,et al.  Remediastinoscopy after neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. , 2002, Lung cancer.

[85]  S. Gambhir Molecular imaging of cancer with positron emission tomography , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[86]  F. Schramel,et al.  Surgery as part of combined modality treatment in stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[87]  L. Voltolini,et al.  Results of induction chemotherapy followed by surgical resection in patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer: the importance of the nodal down-staging after chemotherapy. , 2001, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[88]  A. Alavi,et al.  18F-FDG PET in characterizing adrenal lesions detected on CT or MRI. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[89]  N. Gupta,et al.  Clinical utility of PET-FDG imaging in differentiation of benign from malignant adrenal masses in lung cancer. , 2001, Clinical lung cancer.

[90]  M. Duffy,et al.  Carcinoembryonic antigen as a marker for colorectal cancer: is it clinically useful? , 2001, Clinical chemistry.

[91]  M. Christian,et al.  [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors]. , 2000, Bulletin du cancer.

[92]  W. Richards,et al.  Nodal stage after induction therapy for stage IIIA lung cancer determines patient survival. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[93]  R. Rami-Porta,et al.  Remediastinoscopy after induction chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[94]  S S Gambhir,et al.  A meta-analysis of the literature for whole-body FDG PET detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[95]  Hongyung Choi,et al.  Characteristics of long‐term survivors after treatment for inoperable carcinoma of the lung , 1985, American journal of clinical oncology.

[96]  T. Akhurst,et al.  Systematic Review of FDG-PET Prediction of Complete Pathological Response and Survival in Rectal Cancer , 2014 .

[97]  小島原典子,et al.  診断精度研究のバイアスリスク評価ツールQUADAS-2:a Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 の活用 , 2014 .

[98]  F. Abtin,et al.  Evaluation of treatment response after nonoperative therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma. , 2011, Cancer journal.

[99]  P. Lambin,et al.  18FDG-PET-CT in the follow-up of non-small cell lung cancer patients after radical radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: an economic evaluation. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[100]  M. Beland,et al.  Primary non-small cell lung cancer: review of frequency, location, and time of recurrence after radiofrequency ablation. , 2010, Radiology.

[101]  Xiaoguang Sun,et al.  Diagnostic value of FDG‐PET in recurrent colorectal carcinoma: A meta‐analysis , 2009, International journal of cancer.

[102]  F. Detterbeck Diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer : an evidence-based guide for the practicing clinician , 2001 .

[103]  A. Miller,et al.  Reporting results of cancer treatment , 1981, Cancer.