Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model

There is accumulating evidence that the actions of others are represented in the motor system, leading to automatic imitation. However, whereas early work focused mainly on the effects of observing a single agent, recent studies indicate that the actions of multiple agents can be represented simultaneously. Yet, theorizing has lagged behind. The current study extends the dual-route model of automatic imitation to include multiple agents, and demonstrates, in five simulation studies, that the extended model is able to capture four critical multi-agent effects. Importantly, however, it was necessary to augment the model with a control mechanism regulating response inhibition based on the number of observed actions. Furthermore, additional simulation indicated that this mechanism could be driven by response conflict. Together, our results demonstrate how theories of automatic imitation can be extended from single- to multi-agent settings. As such, they constitute an important step towards a mechanistic understanding of social interaction beyond the dyad.

[1]  M. Brass,et al.  Automatic Imitation of Multiple Agents: Simultaneous or Random Representation? , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Xiucheng Fan,et al.  Group Emotional Contagion and Complaint Intentions in Group Service Failure , 2014 .

[3]  A. Bayliss,et al.  Gaze following in multiagent contexts: Evidence for a quorum-like principle , 2018, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  G. Bird,et al.  Sensorimotor training alters action understanding , 2018, Cognition.

[6]  R. Bogacz,et al.  The neural basis of the speed–accuracy tradeoff , 2010, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  S. Tipper,et al.  Attention modulates motor system activation during action observation: evidence for inhibitory rebound , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Emily E. Butler,et al.  Investigating the Relationship between Stable Personality Characteristics and Automatic Imitation , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  M. Brass,et al.  Automatic imitation of pro- and antisocial gestures: Is implicit social behavior censored? , 2018, Cognition.

[11]  M. Heene,et al.  The bystander-effect: a meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  Matthew J. C. Crump,et al.  In Support of a Distinction between Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Control: A Review of the Literature on Proportion Congruent Effects , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[13]  M. Brass,et al.  Mirroring multiple agents: motor resonance during action observation is modulated by the number of agents. , 2016, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[14]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Hierarchical organization and functional streams in the visual cortex , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Experience-based priming of body parts: A study of action imitation , 2008, Brain Research.

[16]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[18]  Daniel Yoshor,et al.  Receptive fields in human visual cortex mapped with surface electrodes. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  M. Brass,et al.  Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated , 2017, PloS one.

[20]  Lincoln J. Colling,et al.  How does “mirroring” support joint action? , 2013, Cortex.

[21]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  In Praise of a Model but Not Its Conclusions: Commentary on Cooper, Catmur, and Heyes (2012) , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  Nick Chater,et al.  Herding in humans , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Caroline Catmur,et al.  Time course analyses confirm independence of imitative and spatial compatibility. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  E. S. Knowles,et al.  Groups and crowds as social entities: Effects of activity, size, and member similarity on nonmembers. , 1976 .

[25]  M. Brass,et al.  Motor simulation beyond the dyad: Automatic imitation of multiple actors. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  W. Notebaert,et al.  Grounding cognitive control in associative learning. , 2016, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  S. Kornblum,et al.  A Parallel Distributed Processing Model of Stimulus–Stimulus and Stimulus–Response Compatibility , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Facilitation and interference in spatial and body reference frames , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  Béatrice de Gelder,et al.  The neural basis of the bystander effect — The influence of group size on neural activity when witnessing an emergency , 2014, NeuroImage.

[30]  Simon Garnier,et al.  Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Intact imitation of emotional facial actions in autism spectrum conditions , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  M. Brass,et al.  Automatic Imitation: A Meta-Analysis , 2018, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  B. Latané The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[34]  B. Pillon,et al.  Human autonomy and the frontal lobes. Part I: Imitation and utilization behavior: A neuropsychological study of 75 patients , 1986, Annals of neurology.

[35]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  The brain's intention to imitate: The neurobiology of intentional versus automatic imitation , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[36]  Jan Derrfuss,et al.  Imitative response tendencies in patients with frontal brain lesions. , 2003, Neuropsychology.

[37]  M. Zorzi,et al.  A computational model of the Simon effect , 1995, Psychological research.

[38]  E. Renzi,et al.  Imitation and utilisation behaviour. , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[39]  N. Sebanz,et al.  The GROOP effect: Groups mimic group actions , 2011, Cognition.

[40]  G. Alvarez Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. , 1970, Psychological review.

[42]  C. Heyes,et al.  MIRROR NEURONS: TESTS AND TESTABILITY , 2014 .

[43]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[44]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  A Computational PDP Model for Explaining Automatic Imitation , 2012, CogSci.

[45]  Mowei Shen,et al.  Perceiving crowd attention: Gaze following in human crowds with conflicting cues , 2017, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[46]  James Stanley,et al.  Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  Robert J MacCoun,et al.  The Burden of Social Proof: Shared Thresholds and Social Influence , 2011, Psychological review.

[48]  Aude Billard,et al.  Parallel and distributed neural models of the ideomotor principle: An investigation of imitative cortical pathways , 2006, Neural Networks.

[49]  C. Heyes,et al.  Hand to mouth: automatic imitation across effector systems. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  G. Knoblich,et al.  The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[51]  Caroline Catmur,et al.  Are Automatic Imitation and Spatial Compatibility Mediated by Different Processes? , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[52]  C. Heyes Where do mirror neurons come from? , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[53]  R. Bond,et al.  Group Size and Conformity , 2005 .

[54]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  B. Hommel,et al.  HiTEC: a connectionist model of the interaction between perception and action planning , 2016, Psychological research.

[57]  M. Brass,et al.  Motor simulation of multiple observed actions , 2018, Cognition.

[58]  G. Pourtois,et al.  The time course of cognitive control implementation , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[59]  Seth A. Herd,et al.  A Unified Framework for Inhibitory Control Opinion , 2022 .

[60]  B. Latané,et al.  Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  M. Brass,et al.  Representing Multiple Observed Actions in the Motor System , 2018, bioRxiv.

[62]  S. Milgram,et al.  Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. , 1969 .

[63]  Verónica C. Ramenzoni,et al.  Scaling-up Perception-Action Links: Evidence from Synchronization with Individual and Joint Action , 2013, CogSci.

[64]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[65]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Relating retinotopic and object-selective responses in human lateral occipital cortex. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[66]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Anterior inferotemporal neurons of monkeys engaged in object recognition can be highly sensitive to object retinal position. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[67]  M. Brass,et al.  Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[68]  M. Brass,et al.  The role of sensorimotor processes in social group contagion , 2018, Cognitive Psychology.

[69]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[70]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain , 2010, NeuroImage.

[71]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Associative (not Hebbian) learning and the mirror neuron system , 2013, Neuroscience Letters.