Shaping the 2014 Colorado River Delta pulse flow: Rapid environmental flow design for ecological outcomes and scientific learning

Abstract In 2014, the United States and Mexico jointly delivered an environmental flow to the Colorado River Delta, as authorized in a 2012 binational water management agreement known as Minute 319. The agreement specified a volume of water, the source of the water, that the water should be delivered as a pulse flow, and that the objectives of the pulse flow were to pilot environmental restoration and learn about the hydrologic and ecological responses to water delivery into the Colorado River Delta. The Minute did not specify the characteristics of the pulse flow, but rather specified a process, calling on a group of stakeholders, including federal, state, and local water managers as well as non-governmental conservation organizations from both countries, to develop a flow delivery plan. The flow delivery plan was developed, approved, and executed in an exceptionally short period of time, with limited scientific data, under numerous operational constraints. The unique feature that made the hydrograph development a success is the exceptionally close interaction between policy makers, water managers, and scientists, driven by clear objectives for ecological outcomes and scientific learning. In describing this case study, we also document the inevitable tradeoffs that led to a flow design that best met the needs of all parties while fully meeting the needs of none. In so doing, we rationalize the characteristics of the flow delivery hydrograph.

[1]  P. Shafroth,et al.  A large-scale environmental flow experiment for riparian restoration in the Colorado River Delta , 2017 .

[2]  P. Shafroth,et al.  Effects of salinity on establishment of Populus fremontii (cottonwood) and Tamarix ramosissima (saltcedar) , 1995 .

[3]  J. Pitt.  Can we restore the Colorado River delta , 2001 .

[4]  A. Huete,et al.  Regeneration of native trees in response to flood releases from the United States into the delta of the Colorado River, Mexico , 2001 .

[5]  E. Glenn,et al.  Effects of Water Management on the Wetlands of the Colorado River Delta, Mexico , 1996 .

[6]  D. Patten,et al.  Establishment of woody riparian vegetation in relation to annual patterns of streamflow, Bill Williams River, Arizona , 1998, Wetlands.

[7]  Elizabeth B. Harper,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis for complex ecological models: a case study of riparian cottonwood population dynamics. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  G. Sykes.  The Colorado Delta , 1938 .

[9]  J. Ramírez-Hernández,et al.  Groundwater responses to controlled water releases in the limitrophe region of the Colorado River: Implications for management and restoration , 2013 .

[10]  Brian D. Richter,et al.  A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations , 2006 .

[11]  P. Nagler,et al.  Effects of drought on birds and riparian vegetation in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico , 2013 .

[12]  P. Shafroth,et al.  Integrating active restoration with environmental flows to improve native riparian tree establishment in the Colorado River Delta , 2017 .

[13]  Pamela L. Nagler,et al.  Evapotranspiration by remote sensing: An analysis of the Colorado River Delta before and after the Minute 319 pulse flow to Mexico , 2017 .

[14]  J. Schmidt,et al.  Geomorphic change and sediment transport during a small artificial flood in a transformed post-dam delta: The Colorado River delta, United States and Mexico , 2017 .

[15]  Ger Bergkamp,et al.  Flow: the essentials of environmental flows , 2002 .

[16]  T. L. Scheid-Cook,et al.  A Sand County Almanac , 1949 .

[17]  John C. Schmidt,et al.  Large-Scale Flow Experiments for Managing River Systems , 2011 .

[18]  S. G. Nelson,et al.  Regeneration of Native Trees in the Presence of Invasive Saltcedar in the Colorado River Delta, Mexico , 2005 .

[19]  Ian G. Cowx,et al.  The changing role of ecohydrological science in guiding environmental flows , 2014 .

[20]  R. Tharme.  A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers , 2003 .

[21]  Laura E. McMullen,et al.  Are large‐scale flow experiments informing the science and management of freshwater ecosystems? , 2014 .

[22]  R. Naiman,et al.  Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[23]  Laura E. McMullen,et al.  Ecosystem effects of environmental flows: modelling and experimental floods in a dryland river , 2010 .

[24]  Philip L. Fradkin,et al.  A River No More: The Colorado River and the West , 1981 .

[25]  S. Rood,et al.  Streamflow requirements for cottonwood seedling recruitment—An integrative model , 1998, Wetlands.