A linear programming approach to efficiency evaluation in nonconvex metatechnologies

The notions of metatechnology and metafrontier arise in applications of data envelopment analysis (DEA) in which decision making units (DMUs) are not sufficiently homogeneous to be considered as operating in the same technology. In this case, DMUs are partitioned into different groups, each operating in the same technology. In contrast, the metatechnology includes all DMUs and represents all production possibilities that can in principle be achieved in different production environments. Often, the metatechnology cannot be assumed to be a convex set. In such cases benchmarking a DMU against the common metafrontier requires implementing either an enumeration algorithm and solving a linear program at each of its steps, or solving an equivalent mixed integer linear program. In this paper we show that the same task can be accomplished by solving a single linear program. We also show that its dual can be used for the returns-to-scale characterization of efficient DMUs on the metafrontier.

[1]  Robert G. Chambers,et al.  Marginal Values and Returns to Scale for Nonparametric Production Frontiers , 2016, Oper. Res..

[2]  Per Joakim Agrell,et al.  A Dual Approach to Nonconvex Frontier Models , 2001 .

[3]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Pitfalls and protocols in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[5]  Dominique Deprins,et al.  Measuring Labor-Efficiency in Post Offices , 2006 .

[6]  Hervé Leleu,et al.  A linear programming framework for free disposal hull technologies and cost functions: Primal and dual models , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Timo Kuosmanen Weak Disposability in Nonparametric Production Analysis with Undesirable Outputs , 2005 .

[8]  M. Asmild Frontier Differences and the Global Malmquist Index , 2015 .

[9]  G. Battese,et al.  Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios , 2008 .

[10]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Energy efficiency, CO2 emission performance and technology gaps in fossil fuel electricity generation in Korea: A meta-frontier non-radial directional distance functionanalysis , 2013 .

[11]  M. R. Alirezaee,et al.  Developing selective proportionality on the FDH models: new insight on the proportionality axiom , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci..

[12]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[13]  G. Battese,et al.  A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different Technologies , 2004 .

[14]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[15]  P. Zhou,et al.  Energy efficiency , CO 2 emission performance and technology gaps in fossil fuel electricity generation in Korea : A meta-frontier non-radial directional distance function analysis , 2013 .

[16]  Kristof De Witte,et al.  Capturing the environment, a metafrontier approach to the drinking water sector , 2008, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[17]  Victor V. Podinovski,et al.  Differential Characteristics of Efficient Frontiers in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2010, Oper. Res..

[18]  Victor V. Podinovski,et al.  Returns to scale in convex production technologies , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  V. V. Podinovski,et al.  Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[20]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[21]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Productivity change in the water industry in England and Wales: application of the meta-Malmquist index , 2011, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[22]  R. Färe,et al.  Profit, Directional Distance Functions, and Nerlovian Efficiency , 1998 .

[23]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Calculating scale elasticity in DEA models , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[24]  K. Tsekouras,et al.  Are cooperatives the weakest link in European banking? A non-parametric metafrontier approach , 2010 .

[25]  V. V. Podinovski,et al.  Bridging the gap between the constant and variable returns-to-scale models: selective proportionality in data envelopment analysis , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[26]  Xiao Wei,et al.  Dynamic total factor carbon emissions performance changes in the Chinese transportation industry , 2015 .

[27]  Mohsen Afsharian,et al.  The Luenberger indicator and directions of measurement: a bottoms-up approach with an empirical illustration to German savings banks , 2014 .

[28]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[29]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Weak Disposability in Nonparametric Production Analysis: Reply to Färe and Grosskopf , 2009 .

[30]  Victor V. Podinovski,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics A simple derivation of scale elasticity in data envelopment analysis , 2009 .

[31]  Tammo Francksen,et al.  Assessing the performance of German Bundesliga football players: a non-parametric metafrontier approach , 2011, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  C.-H. Lin,et al.  Measuring non-convex metafrontier efficiency in international tourist hotels , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..