Outbound Open Innovation and its Effect on Firm Performance: Examining Environmental Influences

Firms may open up their innovation processes on two dimensions. While inbound open innovation refers to the acquisition of external technology in open exploration processes, outbound open innovation describes the outward transfer of technology in open exploitation processes. Prior open innovation research has focused on the inbound dimension, whereas the outbound dimension has been relatively neglected. Therefore, this article addresses the relationship between outbound open R&D strategies and firm performance. We use data from 136 industrial firms to test four hypotheses on the moderating effects of environmental factors in the relationship between open innovation strategies and firm performance. The results show that the degree of technological turbulence, the transaction rate in technology markets, and the competitive intensity in technology markets strengthen the positive effects of outbound open innovation on firm performance. By contrast, the degree of patent protection does not facilitate successful open innovation. The results are crucially important to managers because they show under what environmental conditions open innovation strategies enhance performance.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[2]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[3]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  External technology acquisition and firm performance: A longitudinal study , 2008 .

[4]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[5]  H. Ernst.  Success Factors of New Product Development: A Review of the Empirical Literature , 2002 .

[6]  R. Nelson,et al.  The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate , 1998 .

[7]  H. Chesbrough.  Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape , 2006 .

[8]  D. Teece.  Reflections on "Profiting from Innovation" , 2006 .

[9]  Ashish Arora,et al.  Patent Protection, Complementary Assets, and Firms' Incentives for Technology Licensing , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Andrea Fosfuri.  The Licensing Dilemma: Understanding the Determinants of the Rate of Technology Licensing , 2006 .

[11]  D. Teece.  Managing Intellectual Capital , 2002 .

[12]  A. Gambardella,et al.  The Market for Patents in Europe , 2006 .

[13]  D. Teece.  Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets , 1998 .

[14]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Minimizing Market Risks Through Customer Integration in New Product Development: Learning from Bad Practice , 2005 .

[15]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[16]  B. O'Connor,et al.  SIMPLE: All-in-One Programs for Exploring Interactions in Moderated Multiple Regression , 1998 .

[17]  J. West,et al.  Challenges of Open Innovation: The Paradox of Firm Investment in Open-Source Software , 2006 .

[18]  J. Gans,et al.  The Product Market and the Market for 'Ideas': Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs , 2002 .

[19]  D. Teece,et al.  How to Capture Value from Innovation: Shaping Intellectual Property and Industry Architecture , 2007 .

[20]  Nieves L. Diaz-Diaz,et al.  Technological Knowledge Assets in Industrial Firms , 2006 .

[21]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[22]  M. J. Zhang.  Information systems, strategic flexibility and firm performance: An empirical investigation , 2005 .

[23]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[24]  R. Musgrave,et al.  Long-term outcome and patterns of failure in patients with advanced head and neck cancer , 2011, Radiation oncology.

[25]  D. Teece,et al.  Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics , 1997 .

[26]  N. Harabi,et al.  Appropriability of technical innovations an empirical analysis , 1995 .

[27]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Drivers of Outsourced Innovation: An Exploratory Study* , 2007 .

[28]  Jens Frøslev Christensen,et al.  The industrial dynamics of Open Innovation—Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics , 2005 .

[29]  J. L. Price.  Handbook of Organizational Measurement , 1975 .

[30]  N. Sakkab,et al.  Connect and Develop : Inside Procter & Gamble's New Model for Innovation , 2006 .

[31]  David Kline,et al.  Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents , 1999 .

[32]  Sadao Nagaoka,et al.  The incidence of cross-licensing: A theory and new evidence on the firm and contract level determinants , 2006 .

[33]  Julie L Davis,et al.  Edison in the Boardroom: How Leading Companies Realize Value from Their Intellectual Assets , 2001 .

[34]  P. Mendi.  Trade in disembodied technology and total factor productivity in OECD countries , 2007 .

[35]  H. Ernst,et al.  External Technology Commercialization in Large Firms: Results of a Quantitative Benchmarking Study , 2007 .

[36]  Niels Noorderhaven,et al.  External Technology Sourcing Through Alliances or Acquisitions: An Analysis of the Application-Specific Integrated Circuits Industry , 2002 .

[37]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Attitudes to Externally Organising Knowledge Management Tasks: A Review, Reconsideration and Extension of the NIH Syndrome , 2006 .

[38]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[39]  A. Griffin.  PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices , 1997 .

[40]  V. Bhatia,et al.  Patenting for Profits , 2007 .

[41]  Birgitte Andersen,et al.  In search of a useful theory of the productive potential of intellectual property rights , 2008 .

[42]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2004 .

[43]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[44]  H. Ernst,et al.  Opening Up the Innovation Process: The Role of Technology Aggressiveness , 2009 .

[45]  M. Dodgson,et al.  The Role of Technology in the Shift Towards Open Innovation: The Case of Procter & Gamble , 2006 .

[46]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A research agenda , 2006 .

[47]  Gary R. Schirr,et al.  Growth and Development of a Body of Knowledge: 16 Years of New Product Development Research, 1989-2004 , 2008 .

[48]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[49]  Chih-Hai Yang,et al.  Trade-related influences, foreign intellectual property rights and outbound international patenting , 2008 .

[50]  Kevin B. Hendricks,et al.  Association Between Supply Chain Glitches and Operating Performance , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[51]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Opening Up the Innovation Process: Towards an Agenda , 2006 .

[52]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The Stage‐Gate Idea to Launch System , 2010 .

[53]  G. Duysters,et al.  Networking as a Means to Strategy Change: The Case of Open Innovation in Mobile Telephony , 2007 .

[54]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Innovacion disruptiva para el cambio social , 2006 .

[55]  C. Herstatt,et al.  Users' Contributions to Radical Innovation: Evidence from Four Cases in the Field of Medical Equipment Technology , 2006 .

[56]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Organizing Pharmaceutical Innovation: From Science‐based Knowledge Creators to Drug‐oriented Knowledge Brokers , 2005 .

[57]  Klaus Brockhoff,et al.  R&D cooperation between firms—a perceived transaction cost perspective , 1992 .

[58]  W. Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Choosing Governance Modes for External Technology Sourcing , 2006 .

[59]  J. Gans,et al.  The Product Market and the Market for 'Ideas': Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs , 2002 .

[60]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[61]  Fabrizio Cesaroni,et al.  Technological outsourcing and product diversification: do markets for technology affect firms’ strategies? , 2004 .

[62]  E. Hippel,et al.  Free revealing and the private-collective model for innovation incentives , 2006 .

[63]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Perspective: The Stage‐Gate® Idea‐to‐Launch Process—Update, What's New, and NexGen Systems* , 2008 .

[64]  J. Cantwell,et al.  Creating Competition? Globalisation and the Emergence of New Technology Producers , 2005 .

[65]  S. Shane,et al.  The Effect of Cultural Differences in Perceptions of Transaction Costs on National Differences in the Preference for Licensing , 1992 .

[66]  J. L. Price,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Measurement , 1975 .

[67]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .