Behavioural studies on binary blended high strength self compacting geopolymer concrete exposed to standard fire temperature
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] V. R. S. Cheela,et al. Fly ash, GGBS, and silica fume based geopolymer concrete with recycled aggregates: Properties and environmental impacts , 2023, Construction and Building Materials.
[2] M. Z. Naser,et al. Physical characteristics and mechanical properties of a sustainable lightweight geopolymer based self-compacting concrete with expanded clay aggregates , 2023, Developments in the Built Environment.
[3] U. J. Alengaram,et al. Promulgation of engineering and sustainable performances of self-compacting geopolymer concrete , 2023, Journal of Building Engineering.
[4] Lianghua Hu,et al. Performance of geopolymer concrete activated by sodium silicate and silica fume activator , 2022, Case Studies in Construction Materials.
[5] Khaled A. Alawi Al-Sodani,et al. Mix design, mechanical properties and durability of the rubberized geopolymer concrete: A review , 2022, Case Studies in Construction Materials.
[6] N. Anand,et al. Investigation on engineering properties and micro-structure characteristics of low strength and high strength geopolymer composites subjected to standard temperature exposure , 2022, Case Studies in Construction Materials.
[7] P. Pradhan,et al. Durability characteristics of geopolymer concrete - Progress and perspectives , 2022, Journal of Building Engineering.
[8] Bassam A. Tayeh,et al. A review of the sustainable utilisation of red mud and fly ash for the production of geopolymer composites , 2022, Construction and Building Materials.
[9] Balamurali Kanagaraj,et al. Performance evaluation on engineering properties of sodium silicate binder as a precursor material for the development of cement-free concrete , 2022, Developments in the Built Environment.
[10] Ruizhe Si,et al. Mechanical and fracture properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with different fibers , 2022, Journal of Building Engineering.
[11] Balamurali Kanagaraj,et al. Performance evaluation of sodium silicate waste as a replacement for conventional sand in geopolymer concrete , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.
[12] R. Polat,et al. The influence of nano-CaO and nano-Al2O3 and curing conditions on perlite based geopolymer concrete produced by the one-part mixing method , 2022, Construction and Building Materials.
[13] Kamal Neupane. Evaluation of Environmental Sustainability of One-part Geopolymer Binder Concrete , 2022, Cleaner Materials.
[14] M. M. Mohd Hasan,et al. Potential of industrial By-Products based geopolymer for rigid concrete pavement application , 2022, Construction and Building Materials.
[15] U. J. Alengaram,et al. Performance evaluation on engineering properties and sustainability analysis of high strength geopolymer concrete , 2022, Journal of Building Engineering.
[16] Shaowei Hu,et al. High-temperature behavior of polyvinyl alcohol fiber-reinforced metakaolin/fly ash-based geopolymer mortar , 2022, Composites Part B: Engineering.
[17] Shuqi Xue,et al. Road life-cycle carbon dioxide emissions and emission reduction technologies: A review , 2022, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition).
[18] T. Ozbakkaloglu,et al. Sustainability benefits and commercialization challenges and strategies of geopolymer concrete: A review , 2022, Journal of Building Engineering.
[19] A. Bahurudeen,et al. Influence of palm oil fuel ash in concrete and a systematic comparison with widely accepted fly ash and slag: A step towards sustainable reuse of agro-waste ashes , 2022, Cleaner Materials.
[20] S. Guler,et al. Effect of high-temperature on the behavior of single and hybrid glass and basalt fiber added geopolymer cement mortars , 2022, Journal of Building Engineering.
[21] B. Sajadi,et al. Phase change materials incorporated into geopolymer concrete for enhancing energy efficiency and sustainability of buildings: A review , 2022, Case Studies in Construction Materials.
[22] T. Kiran,et al. Investigation on Improving the Residual Mechanical Properties of Reinforcement steel and Bond Strength of Concrete Exposed to Elevated Temperature , 2022, Case Studies in Construction Materials.
[23] T. Kiran,et al. Exemplification of sustainable sodium silicate waste sediments as coarse aggregates in the performance evaluation of geopolymer concrete , 2022, Construction and Building Materials.
[24] S. Shekhar,et al. Carbonation of alkali activated binders and comparison with the performance of Ordinary Portland cement and blended cement binders , 2022, Journal of Building Engineering.
[25] P. Chindaprasirt,et al. Rice Husk Ash and Fly Ash Geopolymer Hollow Block Based on NaOH Activated , 2022, Case Studies in Construction Materials.
[26] Q. Yu,et al. Thermal and fire resistance of Class F fly ash based geopolymers – A review , 2022, Construction and Building Materials.
[27] Mucteba Uysal,et al. Evaluation of slag/fly ash based geopolymer concrete with steel, polypropylene and polyamide fibers , 2022, Construction and Building Materials.
[28] M. Amran,et al. Fire resistance of geopolymer concrete: A critical review , 2022, Construction and Building Materials.
[29] P. N,et al. Microstructure investigation of the Na/Ca aluminosilicate hydrate gels and its thermal compatibility in fly ash–GGBS cementitious binder , 2022, Journal of Building Engineering.
[30] S. Bonnet,et al. Compensation of the negative effects of micro-encapsulated phase change materials by incorporating metakaolin in geopolymers based on blast furnace slag , 2022, Construction and Building Materials.
[31] V. Mechtcherine,et al. Influence of elevated temperatures on the residual and quasi in-situ flexural strength of strain-hardening geopolymer composites (SHGC) reinforced with PVA and PE fibers , 2022, Construction and Building Materials.
[32] H. Brouwers,et al. Degradation mechanism of hybrid fly ash/slag based geopolymers exposed to elevated temperatures , 2022, Cement and Concrete Research.
[33] J. Ho,et al. Residual properties of steel slag coarse aggregate concrete after exposure to elevated temperatures , 2022, Construction and Building Materials.
[34] Jinlong Pan,et al. Impact behaviours of engineered geopolymer composite exposed to elevated temperatures , 2021, Construction and Building Materials.
[35] A. Kirchheim,et al. Kaolin mining waste to produce geopolymers: physicomechanical properties and susceptibility to efflorescence formation , 2021, Case Studies in Construction Materials.
[36] J. Sanjayan,et al. Effect of hydrophobic surface-modified fine aggregates on efflorescence control in geopolymer , 2021, Cement and Concrete Composites.
[37] Z. Ding,et al. Property evolution of geopolymer composites with SiC whiskers loaded with BN coating at elevated temperatures , 2021, Construction and Building Materials.
[38] E. S. Sánchez Díaz,et al. Development and use of geopolymers for energy conversion: An overview , 2021, Construction and Building Materials.
[39] T. J. Saravanan,et al. A review on the utilization of red mud for the production of geopolymer and alkali activated concrete , 2021 .
[40] N. Anand,et al. Influence of Various Design Parameters on Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Concrete: A Parametric study by Taguchi Method , 2021, International Journal of Engineering.
[41] U. J. Alengaram,et al. Chemo-physico-mechanical characteristics of high-strength alkali-activated mortar containing non-traditional supplementary cementitious materials , 2021, Journal of Building Engineering.
[42] T. Miranda,et al. One-part hybrid cements from fly ash and electric arc furnace slag activated by sodium sulphate or sodium chloride , 2021, Journal of Building Engineering.
[43] Muhammad Wasim,et al. A state-of-the-art review on the durability of geopolymer concrete for sustainable structures and infrastructure , 2021, Construction and Building Materials.
[44] V. Kodur,et al. Investigation on Bond strength of Self-Compacting Concrete Exposed to Elevated Temperature , 2021 .
[45] Eskinder Desta Shumuye,et al. Effect of the Curing Condition and High-Temperature Exposure on Ground-Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag Cement Concrete , 2021, International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials.
[46] S. Singh,et al. Influence of nano-cementitious materials on improving the corrosion resistance and microstructure characteristics of concrete , 2021 .
[47] S. Barai,et al. Thermal and mechanical properties of concrete and its constituents at elevated temperatures: A review , 2020 .
[48] M. Sivakumar,et al. Geopolymers in construction - recent developments , 2020 .
[49] S. Ibrahim,et al. Performance evaluation of palm oil clinker sand as replacement for conventional sand in geopolymer mortar , 2020 .
[50] O. Gencel,et al. Influence of expanded vermiculite powder and silica fume on properties of foam concretes , 2020 .
[51] Amir Ali Shahmansouri,et al. Compressive strength prediction of eco-efficient GGBS-based geopolymer concrete using GEP method , 2020 .
[52] Manpreet Singh,et al. Environmental impact assessment of fly ash and silica fume based geopolymer concrete , 2020 .
[53] Y. H. M. Amran,et al. Clean production and properties of geopolymer concrete; A review , 2020 .
[54] B. Middendorf,et al. Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: An overview , 2020 .
[55] Mucteba Uysal,et al. Elevated temperature, freezing-thawing and wetting-drying effects on polypropylene fiber reinforced metakaolin based geopolymer composites , 2020 .
[56] Venkatesh Kodur,et al. Spalling behavior of metakaolin-fly ash based geopolymer concrete under elevated temperature exposure , 2020 .
[57] Jianhe Xie,et al. Coupling effects of recycled aggregate and GGBS/metakaolin on physicochemical properties of geopolymer concrete , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.
[58] Jianyu Liang,et al. Preparation of a geopolymer from red mud slurry and class F fly ash and its behavior at elevated temperatures , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.
[59] Prince Arulraj,et al. Experimental investigation of mechanical properties and physical characteristics of concrete under standard fire exposure , 2019, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology.
[60] Sanjay Kumar,et al. Thermo-mechanical characteristics of geopolymer mortar , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.
[61] U. J. Alengaram,et al. Assessment on engineering properties and CO2 emissions of recycled aggregate concrete incorporating waste products as supplements to Portland cement , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.
[62] N. Shah,et al. Development of self-compacting geopolymer concrete as a sustainable construction material , 2018, Sustainable Environment Research.
[63] Kihak Lee,et al. Evaluation of the mechanical properties of sea sand-based geopolymer concrete and the corrosion of embedded steel bar , 2018 .
[64] Ilaria Capasso,et al. Thermal cycling stability of fly ash based geopolymer mortars , 2017 .
[65] Stephen J. Foster,et al. Utilisation of steel furnace slag coarse aggregate in a low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete , 2016 .
[66] Sarbjeet Singh,et al. Performance of granite cutting waste concrete under adverse exposure conditions , 2016 .
[67] Zhongyuan Lu,et al. Investigation of the properties of high-porosity cement foams based on ternary Portland cement–metakaolin–silica fume blends , 2016 .
[68] Jinyu Xu,et al. Mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete exposed to dynamic compression under elevated temperatures , 2016 .
[69] William D.A. Rickard,et al. In-situ thermo-mechanical testing of fly ash geopolymer concretes made with quartz and expanded clay aggregates , 2016 .
[70] U. J. Alengaram,et al. Characteristics of palm oil clinker as replacement for oil palm shell in lightweight concrete subjected to elevated temperature , 2015 .
[71] Bhupinder Singh,et al. Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments , 2015 .
[72] Mahyuddin Ramli,et al. An overview on the influence of various factors on the properties of geopolymer concrete derived from industrial by-products , 2015 .
[73] P. Sarker,et al. Effect of fire exposure on cracking, spalling and residual strength of fly ash geopolymer concrete , 2014 .
[74] Prabir Sarker,et al. Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition , 2014 .
[75] Zhu-guo Li,et al. Effects of elevated temperatures on properties of concrete containing ground granulated blast furnace slag as cementitious material , 2012 .
[76] Rafat Siddique,et al. Effects of elevated temperatures on properties of self-compacting-concrete containing fly ash and spent foundry sand , 2012 .
[77] C. Shi,et al. New cements for the 21st century: The pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement , 2011 .
[78] A. Nadjai,et al. Experimental Behaviour of Carbon FRP Reinforced Concrete Beams at Ambient and Elevated Temperatures , 2008 .
[79] O. Simsek,et al. Effects of elevated temperature on compressive strength and weight loss of the light-weight concrete with silica fume and superplasticizer , 2008 .
[80] Pre De Silva,et al. Medium-term phase stability of Na2O–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O geopolymer systems , 2008 .
[81] H Wong,et al. An Experimental Study of the Mechanical Properties of Fibre Reinforced Polymer (FRP) and Steel Reinforcing Bars at Elevated Temperatures , 2007 .
[82] N. Anand,et al. Influence of Elevated Temperature Exposure on the Interfacial Shear Strength Capacity of Binary Blended High Strength Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete , 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[83] M. Amin,et al. Behavior evaluation of sustainable high strength geopolymer concrete based on fly ash, metakaolin, and slag , 2022, Case Studies in Construction Materials.
[84] Sabbie A. Miller,et al. Literature review on policies to mitigate GHG emissions for cement and concrete , 2022, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.
[85] J. Dai,et al. Influence of coal fly ash on the early performance enhancement and formation mechanisms of silico-aluminophosphate geopolymer , 2020, Cement and Concrete Research.
[86] D. Seshu,et al. A Study on the Strength and Performance of Geopolymer Concrete Subjected to Elevated Temperatures , 2019 .
[87] Paramita Mondal,et al. Role of slag in microstructural development and hardening of fly ash-slag geopolymer , 2013 .