Validation of metagenomic next-generation sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosis of suspected pulmonary infections in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases receiving immunosuppressant therapy

Background The accuracy and sensitivity of conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) are insufficient to identify opportunistic pathogens in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). The study aimed to assess the usefulness of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) vs. CMTs for the diagnosis of pulmonary infections in patients with SARDs receiving immunosuppressant therapy. Methods The medical records of 40 patients with pulmonary infections and SARDs treated with immunosuppressants or corticosteroids were reviewed retrospectively. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples were collected from all patients and examined by mNGS and CMTs. Diagnostic values of the CMTs and mNGS were compared with the clinical composite diagnosis as the reference standard. Results Of the 40 patients included for analysis, 37 (92.5%) were diagnosed with pulmonary infections and 3 (7.5%) with non-infectious diseases, of which two were considered primary diseases and one an asthma attack. In total, 15 pathogens (7 bacteria, 5 fungi, and 3 viruses) were detected by CMTs as compared to 58 (36 bacteria, 12 fungi, and 10 viruses) by mNGS. Diagnostic accuracy of mNGS was superior to that of the CMTs for the detection of co-infections with bacteria and fungi (95 vs. 53%, respectively, p < 0.01), and for the detection of single infections with fungi (97.5 vs. 55%, respectively, p < 0.01). Of the 31 patients diagnosed with co-infections, 4 (12.9%) were positive for two pathogens and 27 (87.1%) for three or more. The detection rate of co-infection was significantly higher for mNGS than CMTs (95 vs. 16%, respectively, p < 0.01). Conclusion The accuracy of mNGS was superior to that of the CMTs for the diagnosis of pulmonary infections in patients with SARDs treated with immunosuppressants. The rapid diagnosis by mNGS can ensure timely adjustment of treatment regimens to improve diagnosis and outcomes.

[1]  Yu Qin,et al.  Metagenomic next‑generation sequencing of BALF for the clinical diagnosis of severe community‑acquired pneumonia in immunocompromised patients: A single‑center study. , 2023, Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.

[2]  C. Traverso,et al.  Shotgun metagenomic sequencing in culture negative microbial keratitis , 2023, European journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  Huan Xu,et al.  Diagnostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid metagenomic next-generation sequencing in pediatric pneumonia , 2022, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.

[4]  Application of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) Using Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid (BALF) in Diagnosing Pneumonia of Children , 2022 .

[5]  X. Su,et al.  The Performance of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequence in the Diagnosis of Suspected Opportunistic Infections in Patients with Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , 2022, Infection and drug resistance.

[6]  Bin Du,et al.  Metagenomic next-generation sequencing: A promising tool for diagnosis and treatment of suspected pneumonia in rheumatic patients with acute respiratory failure: Retrospective cohort study , 2022, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.

[7]  Yuhuan Xie,et al.  Application value of blood metagenomic next-generation sequencing in patients with connective tissue diseases , 2022, Frontiers in Immunology.

[8]  Zhenhua Wang,et al.  Clinical Application and Influencing Factor Analysis of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) in ICU Patients With Sepsis , 2022, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.

[9]  B. Du,et al.  Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of suspected pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. , 2021, The Journal of infection.

[10]  Matteo Biolatti,et al.  Human Cytomegalovirus and Autoimmune Diseases: Where Are We? , 2021, Viruses.

[11]  Xiaorong Lin,et al.  Cryptococcus neoformans: Sex, morphogenesis, and virulence. , 2021, Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases.

[12]  J. Derisi,et al.  Rapid pathogen detection by metagenomic next-generation sequencing of infected body fluids , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[13]  Jie Cao,et al.  Optimal specimen type for accurate diagnosis of infectious peripheral pulmonary lesions by mNGS , 2020, BMC Pulmonary Medicine.

[14]  J. Laar,et al.  Mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and tacrolimus: mechanisms in rheumatology , 2020, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[15]  Rui Wang,et al.  Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for bronchoalveolar lavage diagnostics in critically ill patients. , 2019, European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology.

[16]  Jing Feng,et al.  Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for mixed pulmonary infection diagnosis , 2019, BMC Pulmonary Medicine.

[17]  Yong-qiang Jiang,et al.  The diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for identifying Streptococcus pneumoniae in paediatric bacterial meningitis , 2019, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[18]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Metagenomics in ophthalmology: current findings and future prospectives , 2019, BMJ Open Ophthalmology.

[19]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Next-generation sequencing for the detection of microorganisms present in human donor corneal preservation medium , 2019, BMJ Open Ophthalmology.

[20]  Xiaolin Xu,et al.  Microbiological Diagnostic Performance of Metagenomic Next-generation Sequencing When Applied to Clinical Practice. , 2018, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[21]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[22]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Epidemiological studies in incidence, prevalence, mortality, and comorbidity of the rheumatic diseases , 2009, Arthritis research & therapy.

[23]  N. Müller,et al.  Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. , 2008, Radiology.

[24]  M. Falagas,et al.  Infection-related morbidity and mortality in patients with connective tissue diseases: a systematic review , 2007, Clinical Rheumatology.

[25]  G. Alarcón Infections in systemic connective tissue diseases: systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, and polymyositis/dermatomyositis. , 2006, Infectious disease clinics of North America.

[26]  B. Bresnihan,et al.  Infections and biological therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2003, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.