Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes.

In a change detection paradigm, a target object in a natural scene either rotated in depth, was replaced by another object token, or remained the same. Change detection performance was reliably higher when a target postcue allowed participants to restrict retrieval and comparison processes to the target object (Experiment 1). Change detection performance remained excellent when the target object was not attended at change (Experiment 2) and when a concurrent verbal working memory load minimized the possibility of verbal encoding (Experiment 3). Together, these data demonstrate that visual representations accumulate in memory from attended objects as the eyes and attention are oriented within a scene and that change blindness derives, at least in part, from retrieval and comparison failure.

[1]  G. McConkie,et al.  Eye movements and integrating information across fixations. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  D. E. Irwin Memory for position and identity across eye movements. , 1992 .

[3]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Beyond the Grand Illusion: What Change Blindness Really Teaches Us About Vision , 2000 .

[4]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[6]  M. Tarr,et al.  To What Extent Do Unique Parts Influence Recognition Across Changes in Viewpoint? , 1995 .

[7]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[8]  D. Simons,et al.  Detecting Changes in Novel, Complex Three-dimensional Objects , 2000 .

[9]  J. Henderson,et al.  High-level scene perception. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[11]  M. Hayhoe Vision Using Routines: A Functional Account of Vision , 2000 .

[12]  D. Ballard,et al.  Task constraints in visual working memory , 1997, Vision Research.

[13]  M. Land,et al.  The Roles of Vision and Eye Movements in the Control of Activities of Daily Living , 1998, Perception.

[14]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Global Transsaccadic Change Blindness During Scene Perception , 2003, Psychological science.

[15]  M. Chun,et al.  Organization of visual short-term memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  J. Henderson,et al.  Object identification is isolated from scene semantic constraint: evidence from object type and token discrimination. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[17]  G R Loftus,et al.  The functional visual field during picture viewing. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[18]  J. Henderson,et al.  The Role of Fixation Position in Detecting Scene Changes Across Saccades , 1999 .

[19]  K. Rayner,et al.  Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  R. Shepard Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures , 1967 .

[21]  Mark W. Becker,et al.  The Role of Iconic Memory in Change-Detection Tasks , 2000, Perception.

[22]  J. Henderson,et al.  Types and tokens in transsaccadic object identification: Effects of spatial position and left-right orientation , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  J. Henderson,et al.  Semantic Informativeness Mediates the Detection of Changes in Natural Scenes , 2000 .

[24]  L. Standing Learning 10000 pictures , 1973 .

[25]  David E. Irwin Robert D. Gordon Eye Movements, Attention and Trans-saccadic Memory , 1998 .

[26]  J. Henderson,et al.  Change detection in the flicker paradigm: The role of fixation position within the scene , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[27]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  J M Wolfe,et al.  Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  L. Li,et al.  Searching for One Versus Two Identical Targets: When Visual Search Has a Memory , 2000, Psychological science.

[30]  Carrick C. Williams,et al.  To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  Attenuated Change Blindness for Exogenously Attended Items in a Flicker Paradigm , 2000 .

[32]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? , 2001, Vision Research.

[33]  V. Lollo Temporal integration in visual memory. , 1980 .

[34]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Eye Movements During Scene Viewing: An Overview , 1998 .

[35]  Stephen R Mitroff,et al.  The siren song of implicit change detection. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[38]  Christopher B. Currie,et al.  Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  Todd S. Horowitz,et al.  Visual search has no memory , 1998, Nature.

[40]  R. Klein,et al.  On the manifestations of memory in visual search. , 2000, Spatial vision.

[41]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Postattentive vision. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[43]  Laura A. Carlson-Radvansky Memory for relational information across eye movements , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  R. Haber,et al.  Perception and memory for pictures: Single-trial learning of 2500 visual stimuli , 1970 .

[45]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  John M. Henderson,et al.  The Influence of Enantiomorphic Transformation on Transsaccadic Object Integration , 1999 .

[47]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[48]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. , 1996 .

[49]  I. Biederman,et al.  Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  M. Chun,et al.  Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .

[51]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Eye movements and scene perception: Memory for things observed , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[53]  W. A. Phillips On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[54]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[55]  G. Woodman,et al.  Voluntary and automatic attentional control of visual working memory , 2002 .

[56]  G. Woodman,et al.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[58]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction , 1998 .

[59]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  J. Wolfe Inattentional Amnesia , 2000 .

[61]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Our Eyes do Not Always Go Where we Want Them to Go: Capture of the Eyes by New Objects , 1998 .

[62]  D. Ballard,et al.  Memory Representations in Natural Tasks , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[63]  David E. Irwin Information integration across saccadic eye movements , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[64]  Daniel T. Levin,et al.  Evidence for Preserved Representations in Change Blindness , 2002, Consciousness and Cognition.

[65]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Information integration in perception and communication , 1996 .

[66]  Daniel J. Simons,et al.  Current Approaches to Change Blindness , 2000 .

[67]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of Return is a Foraging Facilitator in Visual Search , 1999 .

[68]  L. Standing Learning 10,000 pictures. , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[69]  A. L. Yarbus,et al.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967, Springer US.

[70]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[71]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[72]  J. Findlay,et al.  The Relationship between Eye Movements and Spatial Attention , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[73]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine , 1998, Cognition.

[74]  A. Friedman Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[75]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’ , 1999, Nature.

[76]  Yuji Takeda Visual search has memory: Evidence from multiple target search , 2002 .

[77]  David E. Irwin,et al.  The role of the saccade target object in the perception of a visually stable world , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[78]  A. Treisman,et al.  Visual memory for novel shapes: implicit coding without attention. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[79]  K. Rayner,et al.  Is visual information integrated across saccades? , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[80]  J. Henderson,et al.  Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[81]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Embodiment is the foundation, not a level , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[82]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Eye Movements, Visual Memory, and Scene Representation , 2000 .

[83]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Evidence against visual integration across saccadic eye movements , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[84]  John M. Henderson,et al.  Transsaccadic Memory and Integration During Real-World Object Perception , 1997 .

[85]  Á. Kristjánsson,et al.  In Search of Remembrance: Evidence for Memory in Visual Search , 2000, Psychological science.

[86]  A. Yagi,et al.  Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[87]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[88]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[89]  E. Averbach,et al.  Short-term memory in vision , 1961 .

[90]  K. Rayner Eye movements and visual cognition : scene perception and reading , 1992 .

[91]  D. Simons In Sight, Out of Mind: When Object Representations Fail , 1996 .

[92]  J. Grier,et al.  Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas. , 1971, Psychological bulletin.

[93]  David E. Irwin,et al.  MEMORY FOR STRUCTURAL INFORMATION ACROSS EYE MOVEMENTS , 1995 .

[94]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[95]  M. Pickering,et al.  Eye guidance in reading and scene perception , 1998 .

[96]  J. Grimes On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. , 1996 .

[97]  J. Henderson,et al.  Eye movements and visual memory: Detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[98]  J. Theeuwes Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[99]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[100]  R. Nickerson,et al.  SHORT-TERM MEMORY FOR COMPLEX MEANINGFUL VISUAL CONFIGURATIONS: A DEMONSTRATION OF CAPACITY. , 1965, Canadian journal of psychology.

[101]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[102]  I. Thornton,et al.  Change Detection Without Awareness: Do Explicit Reports Underestimate the Representation of Change in the Visual System? , 2000 .

[103]  B. Dosher,et al.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.

[104]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[105]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Visual Memory Within and Across Fixations , 1992 .

[106]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Image-based object recognition in man and machines , 2001 .

[107]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.