Influence of Discrete Element Model Parameters on Bulk Behavior of a Granular Solid under Confined Compression

Recent decades have witnessed considerable research effort in the development and application of the discrete element method (DEM) for modeling granular materials. One key aspect that appears to have not been addressed adequately is the choice or determination of the DEM model parameters to produce satisfactory quantitative predictions. In many DEM studies, the input parameters were often not measured and the values were sometimes assumed without any proper justification. This article describes a careful validation study in which DEM was used to model confined compression of spherical (glass beads) and nonspherical (corn grains) particles. The key properties of the particles were independently measured. The experimental data on the bulk compressibility and the corresponding load transfer to the cylindrical wall and the bottom platen provide quantitative information for direct comparison with the DEM results. Initial particle packing structure is expected to influence the bulk behavior of the assembly, so several methods of particle generation were used to investigate the sensitivity of particle generation in DEM. An investigation of the influence of interparticle friction and particle stiffness in DEM simulations provided an insight into the bulk response of the granular assemblies under confined compression. Comparison between the simulations and the experiments revealed several useful observations, including the roles of these model parameters in the predicted bulk responses.

[1]  Jin Y. Ooi,et al.  Confined Compression and Rod Penetration of a Dense Granular Medium: Discrete Element Modelling and Validation , 2006 .

[2]  Mohammad Hossein Abbaspour-Fard,et al.  Shape representation of axi‐symmetrical, non‐spherical particles in discrete element simulation using multi‐element model particles , 1999 .

[3]  Yun-Chi Chung,et al.  Discrete element modelling and experimental validation of a granular solid subject to different loading conditions , 2006 .

[4]  Jin Y. Ooi,et al.  Elastic and plastic predictions of the storing pressures in conical hoppers , 1989 .

[5]  J. Bray,et al.  Selecting a suitable time step for discrete element simulations that use the central difference time integration scheme , 2004 .

[6]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  DEM modelling of industrial granular flows: 3D case studies and the effect of particle shape on hopper discharge , 2002 .

[7]  Brian McPherson,et al.  The Role of Particle Packing in Modeling Rock Mechanical Behavior using Discrete Elements , 2002 .

[8]  Tom Dyakowski,et al.  Flow of sphero-disc particles in rectangular hoppers - A DEM and experimental comparison in 3D , 2004 .

[9]  Masayuki Horio,et al.  A numerical study on agglomerate formation in a fluidized bed of fine cohesive particles , 2002 .

[10]  M. A. Hirt.  Eurocode 1. Basis of design and actions on structures , 1993 .

[11]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[12]  B. K Mishra,et al.  A review of computer simulation of tumbling mills by the discrete element method , 2003 .

[13]  Yutaka Tsuji,et al.  Lagrangian numerical simulation of plug flow of cohesionless particles in a horizontal pipe , 1992 .

[14]  M. Adams,et al.  Discrete particle-continuum fluid modelling of gas–solid fluidised beds , 2002 .

[15]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  Comparison of DEM and experiment for a scale model SAG mill , 2003 .