Persistent gender bias in marine science and conservation calls for action to achieve equity

[1]  R. Loyola,et al.  Pervasive gender bias in editorial boards of biodiversity conservation journals , 2020, Biological Conservation.

[2]  B. Jayabalasingham,et al.  The researcher journey through a gender lens , 2020 .

[3]  K. Deininger,et al.  Women's political leadership and economic empowerment: Evidence from public works in India , 2020 .

[4]  Alessandra Minello,et al.  The pandemic and the female academic , 2020, Nature.

[5]  Rima Wilkes,et al.  The gender gap in commenting: Women are less likely than men to comment on (men’s) published research , 2020, PloS one.

[6]  E. Michalena,et al.  Promoting sustainable and inclusive oceans management in Pacific islands through women and science. , 2020, Marine pollution bulletin.

[7]  Meng-Hua Li,et al.  An Analysis of Grey Multiattribute Decision-Making Optimization Concerning Gender and Sustainable Environment , 2019, Sustainability.

[8]  Georgia-Zozeta Miliopoulou,et al.  Gender Bias in Academia: An Attempt to Render the Intangible Tangible , 2019, Advanced Series in Management.

[9]  K. Grogan,et al.  How the entire scientific community can confront gender bias in the workplace , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[10]  Anna-Katharina Hornidge,et al.  Un-gendering the ocean: Why women matter in ocean governance for sustainability , 2018, Marine Policy.

[11]  Richard Aragon,et al.  NIH funding longevity by gender , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Cindy E. Hauser,et al.  The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? , 2018, PLoS biology.

[13]  Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski,et al.  Opinion: Gender diversity leads to better science , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  E. Cech,et al.  Queer in STEM Organizations: Workplace Disadvantages for LGBT Employees in STEM Related Federal Agencies , 2017, Social sciences.

[15]  D. Schmeller,et al.  Positive sentiment and knowledge increase tolerance towards conservation actions , 2017, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[16]  F. Micheli,et al.  Exploring the role of gender in common-pool resource extraction: evidence from laboratory and field experiments in fisheries , 2016 .

[17]  Jessi L. Smith,et al.  A recipe for change: Creating a more inclusive academy , 2016, Science.

[18]  Leila M. Harris,et al.  Gender and small‐scale fisheries: a case for counting women and beyond , 2015 .

[19]  Ian M. Handley,et al.  Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Vina Ram-Bidesi Recognizing the role of women in supporting marine stewardship in the Pacific Islands , 2015 .

[22]  J. Lubchenco,et al.  Working together: A call for inclusive conservation , 2014, Nature.

[23]  Jason M. Sheltzer,et al.  Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Aparna Joshi,et al.  By Whom and When Is Women’s Expertise Recognized? The Interactive Effects of Gender and Education in Science and Engineering Teams , 2014 .

[25]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science , 2013, Nature.

[26]  Helen Shen Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap , 2013, Nature.

[27]  Allison K Shaw,et al.  Leaks in the pipeline: separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  M. Graham,et al.  Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  A. Schiavetti,et al.  Women participation in the management of a Marine Protected Area in Brazil , 2012 .

[30]  Grinell Smith Does Gender Influence Online Survey Participation? A Record-Linkage Analysis of University Faculty Online Survey Response Behavior. , 2008 .

[31]  J. Østergaard Mind the Gender Gap! , 2007 .

[32]  Kevin B. Wright,et al.  Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[33]  Stephan Klasen,et al.  Gender-related Indicators of Well-being , 2004 .

[34]  T. Carter,et al.  Quality of evidence. , 2003, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[35]  A. Applewhite,et al.  Why so few women , 2002 .

[36]  Xiaoxi Li Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: An Appeal of Global Cooperation for Building Green Civilization , 2020, Green Civilization.

[37]  Gender Equality in Academia and Research Spain PROMOTING GENDER EQUALITY IN RESEARCH Legal framework , 2019 .

[38]  Ilker Etikan,et al.  Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling , 2016 .

[39]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[40]  Adriana Gamazo,et al.  EURYDICE (2013): Key data on teachers and school leaders in Europe. 2013 edition Eurydice report (Luxembourg Publications Office of the European Union) , 2013 .

[41]  C. Hill,et al.  Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. , 2010 .