Copy number variations and protein expression of Cyclin E1 and Epithelial cell transforming sequence 2 genes predict the chemotherapeutic response in patients with serous ovarian carcinoma

Background & Objectives: Serous ovarian carcinoma (SOC) is characterized by extreme genomic instability, chromosomal rearrangements and copy number variations (CNVs) leading to the development of early metastasis and chemo-resistance. The present study was designed to observe the role of CNVs of Cyclin E1 (CCNE1) and Epithelial cell transforming sequence- 2 (ECT2) genes and their encoded proteins in predicting the chemotherapeutic response in SOC patients. Methods: This observational analytical study was conducted at University of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan from December 2019 till June 2022.The study included twenty-five SOC patients with resectable ovarian tumors and twenty-five control subjects. The patients were followed-up for six months for their response to chemotherapy. The CNVs in CCNE1 and ECT-2 genes were determined by real time PCR while serum levels of encoded proteins were determined in controls and cases, before and after six months of treatment, through ELISA. The response to chemotherapy was categorized as sensitive or resistant based on serum CA-125 levels and radiological scans. Results: The copy number variations in CCNE1 and ECT2 genes showed association with the clinic-pathological characteristics and chemotherapy response. Statistically significant difference was found between the mean pre-chemotherapy protein levels of CCNE1 in cases than controls (p-value <0.001) and between the mean pre and post-chemotherapy protein levels of CCNE1 and ECT2 (p-value <0.001) in SOC patients. Conclusion: The copy number variations of CCNE1 and ECT2 genes and their protein expression are positively associated with chemotherapeutic response in SOC patients.

[1]  Aashaq Shah,et al.  Treatment Outcomes of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer A Longitudinal Study , 2022, Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care.

[2]  Zhi‐Jie Zheng,et al.  Worldwide Burden, Risk Factors, and Temporal Trends of Ovarian Cancer: A Global Study , 2022, Cancers.

[3]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Ovarian cancer today and tomorrow: A global assessment by world region and Human Development Index using GLOBOCAN 2020 , 2022, International journal of cancer.

[4]  Y. Guan,et al.  Construction and Validation of a Platinum Sensitivity Predictive Model With Multiple Genomic Variations for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[5]  H. Tariq Detection of Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma along with High Grade Serous Carcinoma of Both Ovaries. , 2021, Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP.

[6]  M. Gumus,et al.  Initial Ca 125 Value as a Predictive Marker for High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. , 2021, Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP.

[7]  D. Matei,et al.  Ovarian Cancer, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. , 2021, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[8]  R. Sayyed,et al.  Retrospective study of ovarian malignancy managed in surgical unit at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore. , 2020, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[9]  A. Weisz,et al.  An Overview of Candidate Therapeutic Target Genes in Ovarian Cancer , 2020, Cancers.

[10]  S. Kehoe FIGO staging in ovarian carcinoma and histological subtypes , 2020, Journal of gynecologic oncology.

[11]  J. Kolesar,et al.  CCNE1 Amplification as a Predictive Biomarker of Chemotherapy Resistance in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer , 2020, Diagnostics.

[12]  R. L. Hollis,et al.  Patterns of clinicopathological features and outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer patients: 35 years of prospectively collected data , 2020, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[13]  Andy S. Alic,et al.  Easy One-Step Amplification and Labeling Procedure for Copy Number Variation Detection. , 2020, Clinical chemistry.

[14]  Wei Liu,et al.  Overexpression of ECT2 is a strong poor prognostic factor in ER(+) breast cancer , 2019, Molecular and clinical oncology.

[15]  T. Shaikh Copy Number Variation Disorders , 2017, Current Genetic Medicine Reports.

[16]  T. Markiewicz,et al.  Functional Assessment of Synoptic Pathology Reporting for Ovarian Cancer , 2016, Pathobiology.

[17]  C. Miller,et al.  The Role of Ect2 Nuclear RhoGEF Activity in Ovarian Cancer Cell Transformation. , 2013, Genes & cancer.

[18]  L. Buchynska,et al.  Assessment of HER-2/neu, с-MYC and CCNE1 gene copy number variations and protein expression in endometrial carcinomas. , 2019, Experimental oncology.

[19]  Yu Wang,et al.  Prognostic value of cyclin E expression in patients with ovarian cancer: a Meta-analysis. , 2017, Journal of B.U.ON. : official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology.

[20]  Rubina Iqbal,et al.  One Year Review of Cases of Ovarian Malignancy at Fatima Memorial Hospital , 2016 .

[21]  S. Bashir,et al.  Level and evaluation of tumor marker CA-125 in ovarian cancer patients in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. , 2015, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.