Emergence of Algal Blooms: The Effects of Short-Term Variability in Water Quality on Phytoplankton Abundance, Diversity, and Community Composition in a Tidal Estuary

Algal blooms are dynamic phenomena, often attributed to environmental parameters that vary on short timescales (e.g., hours to days). Phytoplankton monitoring programs are largely designed to examine long-term trends and interannual variability. In order to better understand and evaluate the relationships between water quality variables and the genesis of algal blooms, daily samples were collected over a 34 day period in the eutrophic Lafayette River, a tidal tributary within Chesapeake Bay’s estuarine complex, during spring 2006. During this period two distinct algal blooms occurred; the first was a cryptomonad bloom and this was followed by a bloom of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate, Gymnodinium instriatum. Chlorophyll a, nutrient concentrations, and physical and chemical parameters were measured daily along with phytoplankton abundance and community composition. While 65 phytoplankton species from eight major taxonomic groups were identified in samples and total micro- and nano-phytoplankton cell densities ranged from 5.8 × 106 to 7.8 × 107 cells L−1, during blooms, cryptomonads and G. instriatum were 91.6% and 99.0%, respectively, of the total phytoplankton biomass during blooms. The cryptomonad bloom developed following a period of rainfall and concomitant increases in inorganic nitrogen concentrations. Nitrate, nitrite and ammonium concentrations 0 to 5 days prior were positively lag-correlated with cryptomonad abundance. In contrast, the G. insriatum bloom developed during periods of low dissolved nitrogen concentrations and their abundance was negatively correlated with inorganic nitrogen concentrations.

[1]  G. Pinay,et al.  Structure and function of buffer strips from a water-quality perspective in agricultural landscapes , 1995 .

[2]  C. Tomas,et al.  Red tide blooms of Cochlodinium polykrikoides in a coastal cove , 2008 .

[3]  H. Marshall,et al.  Dinoflagellate Cysts Within Sediment Collections From the Southern Chesapeake Bay, and Tidal Regions of the James, York, and Rappahannock Rivers, Virginia , 2008 .

[4]  H. Marshall,et al.  Phytoplankton reference communities for Chesapeake Bay and its tidal tributaries , 2005 .

[5]  Ron B. H. Wills,et al.  Effects of temperature. , 2007 .

[6]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  The Balance of Nature and Human Impact: The paradox of the plankton , 2013 .

[7]  Hans W. Paerl,et al.  Seasonal phytoplankton composition, productivity and biomass in the Neuse River estuary, North Carolina , 1991 .

[8]  D. Conley,et al.  Scales of nutrient-limited phytoplankton productivity in Chesapeake Bay , 1996 .

[9]  H. Marshall,et al.  Morphological Variation and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Dinoflagellate Gymnodinium aureolum from a Tributary of Chesapeake Bay , 2008, The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology.

[10]  M. Willig,et al.  The Relationship Between Productivity and Species Richness , 1999 .

[11]  R. Magnien,et al.  Excessive nutrients select for dinoflagellates in the stratified Patapsco River estuary: Margalef reigns , 2001 .

[12]  C. Gobler,et al.  POSITIVE FEEDBACK AND THE DEVELOPMENT AND PERSISTENCE OF ECOSYSTEM DISRUPTIVE ALGAL BLOOMS 1 , 2006 .

[13]  D. Moyer,et al.  Changes in streamflow and water quality in selected nontidal sites in the Chesapeake Bay Basin, 1985-2003 , 2004 .

[14]  J. Cloern EFFECTS OF LIGHT INTENSITY AND TEMPERATURE ON CRYPTOMONAS OVATA (CRYPTOPHYCEAE) GROWTH AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE RATES 1 , 1977 .

[15]  R. Alden,et al.  A comparison of phytoplankton assemblages and environmental relationships in three estuarine rivers of the lower Chesapeake Bay , 1990 .

[16]  D. W. Coats,et al.  PARASITISM OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC DINOFLAGELLATES BY THREE STRAINS OF AMOEBOPHRYA (DINOPHYTA): PARASITE SURVIVAL, INFECTIVITY, GENERATION TIME, AND HOST SPECIFICITY1 , 2002 .

[17]  L. Solórzano Determination of ammonia in natural waters by the phenol hypochlorite method , 1969 .

[18]  J. Adolf,et al.  Can cryptophyte abundance trigger toxic Karlodinium veneficum blooms in eutrophic estuaries , 2008 .

[19]  B. Mitchell-Innes,et al.  Short-term variability during an anchor station study in the southern Benguela upwelling system : Phytoplankton production and biomass in relation to specie changes , 1991 .

[20]  E. Laws,et al.  Coastal water quality in Hawaii : the importance of buffer zones and dilution , 1999 .

[21]  E. Johnston,et al.  MBACI sampling of an episodic disturbance: stormwater effects on algal epifauna. , 2007, Marine environmental research.

[22]  M. Lomas,et al.  Inorganic and Organic Nitrogen Use by Phytoplankton Along Chesapeake Bay, Measured Using a Flow Cytometric Sorting Approach , 2010 .

[23]  M. Leibold Biodiversity and nutrient enrichment in pond plankton communities , 1999 .

[24]  Gurney Seed Nursery Co. Spring and fall , 1918 .

[25]  P. Glibert,et al.  HARMFUL ALGAE POSE ADDITIONAL CHALLENGES FOR OYSTER RESTORATION: IMPACTS OF THE HARMFUL ALGAE KARLODINIUM VENEFICUM AND PROROCENTRUM MINIMUM ON EARLY LIFE STAGES OF THE OYSTERS CRASSOSTREA VIRGINICA AND CRASSOSTREA ARIAKENSIS , 2007 .

[26]  T. Berman,et al.  Dissolved organic nitrogen: a dynamic participant in aquatic ecosystems , 2003 .

[27]  John Cairns,et al.  Algae as indicators of environmental change , 1994, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[28]  I. Jenkinson,et al.  Encystment and excystment of Gyrodinium instriatum Freudenthal et Lee , 2008 .

[29]  D. Stoecker,et al.  Spatial and temporal aspects of Gyrodinium galatheanum in Chesapeake Bay: distribution and mixotrophy , 2000 .

[30]  Erin R. Haramoto,et al.  Harmful algal blooms in the Chesapeake and Coastal Bays of Maryland, USA: Comparison of 1997, 1998, and 1999 events , 2001 .

[31]  R. Tait,et al.  SOME OBSERVATIONS OF THE DIURNAL HEAT WAVE IN THE OCEAN1 , 1969 .

[32]  Louis A. Codispoti,et al.  In situ nutrient monitoring: A tool for capturing nutrient variability and the antecedent conditions that support algal blooms , 2008 .

[33]  M. Kemp,et al.  Potential climate-change impacts on the Chesapeake Bay , 2008 .

[34]  H. Paerl,et al.  Phytoplankton Community Indicators of Short- and Long-term Ecological Change in the Anthropogenically and Climatically Impacted Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina, USA , 2010 .

[35]  H. Marshall,et al.  Using frequency of dividing cells in estimating autotrophic picoplankton growth and productivity in the Chesapeake Bay , 1994, Hydrobiologia.

[36]  P. J. Hansen The Role of Photosynthesis and Food Uptake for the Growth of Marine Mixotrophic Dinoflagellates 1 , 2011, The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology.

[37]  D. Conley,et al.  Annual cycle of dissolved silicate in Chesapeake bay: implications for the production and fate of phytoplankton biomass , 1992 .

[38]  M. F. Macedo,et al.  The Relationship between Phytoplankton Diversity and Community Function in a Coastal Lagoon , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[39]  George E. Boneillo,et al.  Comparison of Nutrient and Microbial Dynamics over a Seasonal Cycle in a Mid-Atlantic Coastal Lagoon Prone to Aureococcus anophagefferens (Brown Tide) Blooms , 2009 .

[40]  Michael R. Roman,et al.  Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historical trends and ecological interactions , 2005 .

[41]  H. Paerl,et al.  Non-monotonic Responses of Phytoplankton Biomass Accumulation to Hydrologic Variability: A Comparison of Two Coastal Plain North Carolina Estuaries , 2012, Estuaries and Coasts.

[42]  H. Marshall Seasonal phytoplankton composition in the lower Chesapeake Bay and old plantation Creek, Cape Charles, Virginia , 1980 .

[43]  D. Stoecker,et al.  Use of the ‘Food Vacuole Content’ Method to Estimate Grazing by the Mixotrophic Dinoflagellate Gyrodinium Galatheanum on Cryptophytes , 2001 .

[44]  J. Adolf,et al.  Environmental forcing of phytoplankton floral composition, biomass, and primary productivity in Chesapeake Bay, USA , 2006 .

[45]  H. Marshall,et al.  Seasonal patterns of growth and composition of phytoplankton in the lower Chesapeake Bay and vicinity , 1986 .

[46]  C. Duke,et al.  Short-term environmental variability and phytoplankton abundance in a shallow tidal estuary , 1987 .

[47]  C. Duke,et al.  Short-term environmental variability and phytoplankton abundance in a shallow tidal estuary II. Spring and fall , 1993 .

[48]  Hans W. Paerl,et al.  PHYTOPLANKTON INDICATORS OF ECOLOGICAL CHANGE IN THE EUTROPHYING PAMLICO SOUND SYSTEM, NORTH CAROLINA , 2007 .

[49]  C. Gobler,et al.  Understanding Causes and Impacts of the Dinoflagellate, Cochlodinium polykrikoides, Blooms in the Chesapeake Bay , 2009 .

[50]  H. Marshall,et al.  Phytoplankton and nutrient dynamics in a tidally dominated eutrophic estuary: daily variability and controls on bloom formation , 2014 .

[51]  Y. Shimasaki,et al.  Effects of temperature, salinity and irradiance on the growth of the red tide dinoflagellate Gyrodinium instriatum Freudenthal et Lee , 2006 .

[52]  M. Menezes,et al.  How diverse are planktonic cryptomonads in Brazil? Advantages and difficulties of a taxonomic-biogeographical approach , 2003, Hydrobiologia.

[53]  Jian Shen,et al.  Environmental and Physical Controls on the Formation and Transport of Blooms of the Dinoflagellate Cochlodinium polykrikoides Margalef in the Lower Chesapeake Bay and Its Tributaries , 2011 .

[54]  Philippe Archambault,et al.  The relation between productivity and species diversity in temperate-Arctic marine ecosystems. , 2008, Ecology.

[55]  Jef Huisman,et al.  Global biodiversity patterns of marine phytoplankton and zooplankton , 2004, Nature.

[56]  S. Nehring Mechanisms for recurrent nuisance algal blooms in coastal zones: resting cyst formation as life-strategy of dinoflagellates , 1993 .

[57]  J. Cloern,et al.  Phytoplankton community ecology: principles applied in San Francisco Bay , 2005 .

[58]  M. Mulholland,et al.  Storm chasing: Nutrient dynamics in the tidal James River before, during, and after hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee , 2012, 2012 Oceans.

[59]  Y. Lagadeuc,et al.  Phytoplankton community structure and primary production in small intertidal estuarine-bay ecosystem (eastern English Channel, France) , 2007 .

[60]  M. Mulholland,et al.  Controls on the initiation and development of blooms of the dinoflagellate Cochlodinium polykrikoides Margalef in lower Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries , 2013 .

[61]  N. Welschmeyer Fluorometric analysis of chlorophyll a in the presence of chlorophyll b and pheopigments , 1994 .

[62]  J. Burkholder,et al.  Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Nutrient sources, composition, and consequences , 2002 .

[63]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  Relating nutrient discharges from watersheds to land use and streamflow variability , 1997 .

[64]  H. Claustre,et al.  Responses of growth rate, pigment composition and optical properties of Cryptomonas sp. to light and nitrogen stresses , 2000 .

[65]  H. Seliger,et al.  Annual subsurface transport of a red tide dinoflagellate to its bloom area: Water circulation patterns and organism distributions in the Chesapeake Bay 1 , 1978 .

[66]  H. Marshall,et al.  Assessment and significance of phytoplankton species composition within Chesapeake Bay and Virginia tributaries through a long-term monitoring program , 2009, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[67]  T. Weisse,et al.  Feeding of the heterotrophic freshwater dinoflagellate Peridiniopsis berolinense on cryptophytes: analysis by flow cytometry and electronic particle counting , 1997 .

[68]  D. Anderson,et al.  POTENTIAL IMPORTANCE OF BENTHIC CYSTS OF GONYAULAX TAMARENSIS AND G. EXCAVATA IN INITIATING TOXIC DINOFLAGELLATE BLOOMS 1, 2, 3 , 1978 .

[69]  H. Marshall,et al.  Phytoplankton assemblages associated with water quality and salinity regions in Chesapeake Bay, USA , 2006 .

[70]  D. Anderson,et al.  Community assembly and seasonal succession of marine dinoflagellates in a temperate estuary: The importance of life cycle events , 2006 .

[71]  L. Cahoon,et al.  Short-term variability of water quality parameters in two shallow estuaries of North Carolina , 1999 .

[72]  Engel G. Vrieling,et al.  TOXIC PHYTOPLANKTON BLOOMS IN THE SEA , 1993 .

[73]  M. Furnas In situ growth rates of marine phytoplankton: approaches to measurement, community and species growth rates , 1990 .

[74]  Scott R. Marion,et al.  Long-Term Trends in Submersed Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) in Chesapeake Bay, USA, Related to Water Quality , 2010 .

[75]  Cristian S. Calude The mathematical theory of information , 2007 .

[76]  C. Gobler,et al.  Eutrophication and Harmful Algal Blooms: A Scientific Consensus. , 2008, Harmful algae.

[77]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[78]  W. Dennison,et al.  Long-Term Trends of Water Quality and Biotic Metrics in Chesapeake Bay: 1986 to 2008 , 2010 .

[79]  J. Grover,et al.  LIMITING RESOURCES, DISTURBANCE, AND DIVERSITY IN PHYTOPLANKTON COMMUNITIES , 2004 .

[80]  T. Uchida,et al.  Predation by a photosynthetic dinoflagellate Gyrodinium instriatum on loricated ciliates. , 1997 .

[81]  J. Cloern,et al.  The Modification of an Estuary , 1986, Science.

[82]  Kyoung‐Ho Cho,et al.  A modeling study on the response of Chesapeake Bay to hurricane events of Floyd and Isabel , 2012 .

[83]  C. Gobler,et al.  The role of nitrogenous nutrients in the occurrence of harmful algal blooms caused by Cochlodinium polykrikoides in New York estuaries (USA) , 2012 .

[84]  David Mouillot,et al.  Effects of pulsed nutrient inputs on phytoplankton assemblage structure and blooms in an enclosed coastal area , 2007 .