A Neuroskeptic's Guide to Neuroethics and National Security

This article—informed by science studies scholarship and consonant with the emerging enterprise of “critical neuroscience”—critiques recent neuroscience research, and its current and potential applications in the national security context. The author expresses concern about the subtle interplay between the national security and neuroscience communities, and the hazards of the mutual enchantment that may ensue. The Bush Administration's “war on terror” has provided numerous examples of the abuse of medicine, behavioral psychology, polygraphy, and satellite imagery. The defense and national security communities have an ongoing interest in neuroscience too—in particular, neuroimaging and psychoactive drugs (including oxytocin) as aids to interrogation. Given the seductive allure of neuroscientific explanations and colorful brain images, neuroscience in a national security context is particularly vulnerable to abuse. The author calls for an urgent reevaluation of national security neuroscience as part of a broader public discussion about neuroscience's nontherapeutic goals.

[1]  A. Mitchell Picturing Personhood: Brain Scans and Biomedical Identity Joseph Dumit , 2004, The Lancet Neurology.

[2]  D. Gaffan,et al.  The Role of the Medial Temporal Lobe in Memory and Perception: Evidence from Rats, Nonhuman Primates and Humans , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[3]  Judy Illes,et al.  Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  David Dickson Science and its Public , 2000 .

[5]  G. Gudjonsson The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook , 2003 .

[6]  W. Young,et al.  Oxytocin: The great facilitator of life , 2009, Progress in Neurobiology.

[7]  J. D. Trout Seduction without cause: uncovering explanatory neurophilia , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Timothy Caulfield,et al.  “Neurohype” and the Name Game: Who's to Blame? , 2010 .

[9]  F. Plum,et al.  Behavioural improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury , 2008, Nature.

[10]  G. Marcus Technoscientific imaginaries : conversations, profiles, and memoirs , 1995 .

[11]  R. Strous Response to a Neuroskeptic: Neuroscientific Endeavor Versus Clinical Boundary Violation , 2010 .

[12]  Robert A. Fein,et al.  Educing Information: Interrogation: Science and Art, Foundations for the Future, Intelligence Science Board, Phase 1 Report , 2006 .

[13]  R. Bennett Endorsement by the Seminar Military Interrogators , 2007 .

[14]  Alan D. Castel,et al.  Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning , 2008, Cognition.

[15]  Suparna Choudhury,et al.  Critical Neuroscience: Linking Neuroscience and Society through Critical Practice , 2009 .

[16]  Kenneth R Foster,et al.  Response to Commentators on “Emerging Neurotechnologies for Lie-Detection: Promises and Perils?” , 2005, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[17]  R. Henson What can Functional Neuroimaging Tell the Experimental Psychologist? , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[18]  J. Marks Interrogational Neuroimaging in Counterterrorism: A “No-Brainer” or a Human Rights Hazard? , 2007, American Journal of Law & Medicine.

[19]  Janez Mayer The dark side : the inside story of how the War on Terror turned into a war on American ideals , 2008 .

[20]  P. Benanti From Neuroskepticism to Neuroethics: Role of Morality in Neuroscience That Becomes Neurotechnology , 2010 .

[21]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Oxytocin increases trust in humans , 2005, Nature.

[22]  Donald R. DuRousseau,et al.  Neuroethics and National Security , 2007, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[23]  J. Fins Mind Wars: Brain Research and National Defense , 2007 .

[24]  J. Marks Doctors as Pawns? Law and Medical Ethics at Guantanamo Bay , 2007, Seton Hall law review.

[25]  C. Fisher Brain Stimulation and National Security: Considering the Narratives of Neuromodulation , 2010 .

[26]  G. Marchant,et al.  National Security Neuroscience and the Reverse Dual-Use Dilemma , 2010 .

[27]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Oxytocin Shapes the Neural Circuitry of Trust and Trust Adaptation in Humans , 2008, Neuron.

[28]  A. Roskies Neuroimaging and Inferential Distance , 2008 .

[29]  C. Don Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain , 2004 .

[30]  M. Bentwich Is It Really About Neuroethics? On National Security, Fear, and Superstition , 2010 .

[31]  Joy Hirsch Magnetic appeal: MRI and the myth of transparency , 2009 .

[32]  K. Weiss,et al.  What stamps the wrinkle deeper on the brow? , 2003 .

[33]  F. Fischer Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge , 2000 .

[34]  L. Kirmayer,et al.  From Brain Image to the Bush Doctrine: Critical Neuroscience and the Political Uses of Neurotechnology , 2010 .

[35]  Deena Skolnick Weisberg,et al.  The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Steven Laureys,et al.  AM: The vegetative state , 2022 .

[37]  K. Thomsen A Foucauldian analysis of “A Neuroskeptic's Guide to Neuroethics and National Security” , 2010 .

[38]  J. Horgan,et al.  From Profiles to Pathways and Roots to Routes: Perspectives from Psychology on Radicalization into Terrorism , 2008 .

[39]  S. Nagel Critical Perspective on Dual-Use Technologies and a Plea for Responsibility in Science , 2010 .