Binaural Directional Hearing—Impairments and Aids

It is apparent, particularly when we close our eyes, that the auditory system creates a spatial representation of the acoustic environment. We are able to monitor sound sources in all directions, determine the nature and positions of the various sound sources, and focus our attention on sounds in a particular direction. In addition, we can determine certain aspects of the environment itself, such as the size and acoustic “liveness” of the space in which the sounds are generated. Although certain aspects of auditory spatial perception and directional hearing can be achieved when listening with a single ear, it is clear that listening is easier and more effective when listening with two ears. This conclusion is supported by subjective reports as well as by objective experiments on both normal and hearing-impaired listeners (e.g., see Durlach and Colburn, 1978; Durlach et al, 1981; Blauert, 1983; Hausler et al, 1983).

[1]  L. Rabiner,et al.  Predicting binaural gain in intelligibility and release from masking for speech. , 1967, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  W. Koenig,et al.  Subjective Effects in Binaural Hearing , 1950 .

[3]  A. Markides,et al.  Binaural hearing aids , 1977 .

[4]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[5]  F L Wightman,et al.  Detectability of a pulsed tone in the presence of a masker with time-varying interaural correlation. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  P. Zurek Consequences of conductive auditory impairment for binaural hearing. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  H Levitt,et al.  Speech reception with low-frequency speech energy. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  H S Colburn,et al.  Binaural interaction of impaired listeners. A review of past research. , 1981, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[9]  E. Harford,et al.  Versions of the CROS hearing aid. , 1974, Archives of otolaryngology.

[10]  B. Franklin,et al.  The effect on consonant discrimination of combining a low-frequency passband in one ear and a high-frequency passband in the other ear , 1969 .

[11]  R Domnitz The interaural time jnd as a simultaneous function of interaural time and interaural amplitude. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Frederic L. Wightman,et al.  Detectability of varying interaural temporal differencesa) , 1978 .

[13]  N. Durlach,et al.  Interaural time and amplitude jnds for a 500-Hz tone. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  P M Zurek,et al.  Measurements of binaural echo suppression. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. XIII. Perceptual anchor model of context-coding. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Samuel F. Lybarger,et al.  Binaural Hearing and Amplification. , 1981 .

[17]  E. Shaw Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  N. I. Durlach Note on Binaural Masking‐Level Differences at High Frequencies , 1964 .

[19]  Usage of CROS hearing aids by unilaterally deaf patients. , 1979, Archives of otolaryngology.

[20]  H S Colburn,et al.  Model for auditory localization. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  G. Sung,et al.  Directional microphone in hearing aids. Effects on speech discrimination in noise. , 1975, Archives of otolaryngology.

[22]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  G F Haas Impaired listeners' recognition of speech presented dichotically through high- and low-pass filters. , 1982, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[24]  Colburn Hs Binaural interaction and localization with various hearing impairments. , 1982 .

[25]  G. H. Yates,et al.  Signal Processing for a Cocktail Party Effect , 1969 .

[26]  R. Held Shifts in binaural localization after prolonged exposures to atypical combinations of stimuli. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[27]  D B Hawkins,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[28]  Binaural interaction in hearing impaired listeners , 1983 .

[29]  A. Mills On the minimum audible angle , 1958 .

[30]  B Franklin The effect of combining low- and high-frequency passbands on consonant recognition in the hearing impaired. , 1975, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[31]  E. E. David,et al.  Reproducing the Cocktail Party Effect , 1960 .