Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter.

OBJECTIVES We previously showed that peak abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) wall stress calculated for aneurysms in vivo is higher at rupture than at elective repair. The purpose of this study was to analyze rupture risk over time in patients under observation. METHODS Computed tomography (CT) scans were analyzed for patients with AAA when observation was planned for at least 6 months. AAA wall stress distribution was computationally determined in vivo with CT data, three-dimensional computer modeling, finite element analysis (nonlinear hyperelastic model depicting aneurysm wall behavior), and blood pressure during observation. RESULTS Analysis included 103 patients and 159 CT scans (mean follow-up, 14 +/- 2 months per CT). Forty-two patients were observed with no intervention for at least 1 year (mean follow-up, 28 +/- 3 months). Elective repair was performed within 1 year in 39 patients, and emergent repair was performed in 22 patients (mean, 6 +/- 1 month after CT) for rupture (n = 14) or acute severe pain. Significant differences were found for initial diameter (observation, 4.9 +/-.1 cm; elective repair, 5.9 +/-.1 cm; emergent repair, 6.1 +/-.2 cm; P <.0001) and initial peak wall stress (38 +/- 1 N/cm(2), 42 +/- 2 n/cm(2), 58 +/- 4 N/cm(2), respectively; P <.0001), but peak wall stress appeared to better differentiate patients who later required emergent repair (elective vs emergent repair: diameter, 3% difference, P =.5; stress, 38% difference, P <.0001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for predicting rupture were better for peak wall stress (sensitivity, 94%; specificity,81%; accuracy, 85% [with 44 N/cm(2) threshold]) than for diameter (81%, 70%, 73%, respectively [with optimal 5.5 cm threshold). With proportional hazards analysis, peak wall stress (relative risk, 25x) and gender (relative risk, 3x) were the only significant independent predictors of rupture. CONCLUSIONS For AAAs under observation, peak AAA wall stress seems superior to diameter in differentiating patients who will experience catastrophic outcome. Elevated wall stress associated with rupture is not simply an acute event near the time of rupture.

[1]  M. Webster,et al.  Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[2]  R G Stringfellow,et al.  The influence of aorta-aneurysm geometry upon stress in the aneurysm wall. , 1987, The Journal of surgical research.

[3]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Should endovascular surgery lower the threshold for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms? , 1999, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  J. Stanley,et al.  Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm prevalence, treatment, and outcome. , 1997, Journal of vascular surgery.

[5]  D A Vorp,et al.  Mechanical properties and microstructure of intraluminal thrombus from abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  D. Brewster,et al.  Autopsy Study of Unoperated Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: The Case for Early Resection , 1977, Circulation.

[7]  D. Hovsepian,et al.  Elevated plasma levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms: a circulating marker of degenerative aneurysm disease. , 2000, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[8]  T Länne,et al.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm wall mechanics and their relation to risk of rupture. , 1999, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[9]  J. Feinglass,et al.  The importance of surgeon volume and training in outcomes for vascular surgical procedures. , 1999, Journal of vascular surgery.

[10]  E F Bernstein,et al.  Computed tomography scanning findings associated with rapid expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 1994, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  R. Budwig,et al.  The influence of shape on the stresses in model abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  R Fumero,et al.  Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the presence of endoluminal thrombus: experimental characterisation and structural static computational analysis. , 1998, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[13]  F. Kennedy,et al.  Mechanical Properties Characterization of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Tissue Using Biaxial Testing , 2002 .

[14]  D J Ballard,et al.  Design of the abdominal aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Study. ADAM VA Cooperative Study Group. , 1994, Journal of vascular surgery.

[15]  W. Mower,et al.  Stress distributions in vascular aneurysms: factors affecting risk of aneurysm rupture. , 1993, The Journal of surgical research.

[16]  A. R. Brady,et al.  Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms , 1998, The Lancet.

[17]  J. Byrne,et al.  Prognosis of patients turned down for conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the endovascular and sonographic era: Szilagyi revisited? , 2001, Journal of vascular surgery.

[18]  T. M. Silver,et al.  Actuarial analysis of variables associated with rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 1985, Surgery.

[19]  A. R. Brady,et al.  Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2002 .

[20]  J. Cronenwett,et al.  Variables That Affect the Expansion Rate and Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 1996, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[21]  J D Humphrey,et al.  Pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multidisciplinary research program supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. , 2001, Journal of vascular surgery.

[22]  M. Fillinger,et al.  Life expectancy after endovascular versus open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: results of a decision analysis model on the basis of data from EUROSTAR. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[23]  Samuel E. Wilson,et al.  Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  M L Raghavan,et al.  Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  David A. Vorp,et al.  Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: influence of diameter and asymmetry. , 1998, Journal of vascular surgery.

[26]  S S Gambhir,et al.  Effect of intraluminal thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress. , 1997, Journal of vascular surgery.

[27]  D E Szilagyi,et al.  Clinical fate of the patient with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm and unfit for surgical treatment. , 1972, Archives of surgery.

[28]  R Fumero,et al.  Biomechanical factors in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. , 1993, European journal of vascular surgery.

[29]  D. Freeman,et al.  Variables that affect the expansion rate and outcome of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 1990, Journal of vascular surgery.

[30]  D. Zelt,et al.  Selective management of abdominal aortic aneurysms in a prospective measurement program. , 1996, Journal of vascular surgery.

[31]  J. H. van Bockel,et al.  Thrombus within an aortic aneurysm does not reduce pressure on the aneurysmal wall. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[32]  David A. Vorp,et al.  Effect of intraluminal thrombus thickness and bulge diameter on the oxygen diffusion in abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[33]  Gary R Johnson,et al.  Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair. , 2002, JAMA.

[34]  D. Ballard,et al.  Learning from the last ultrasound. A population-based study of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[35]  Kaspar Willam,et al.  5th U.S. National Congress on Computational Mechanics , 2001 .

[36]  S. Anand,et al.  Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2002, Vascular medicine.

[37]  S. Nicholls,et al.  Rupture in small abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 1998, Journal of vascular surgery.

[38]  Mark F Fillinger,et al.  In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.