Reconceptualizing rhetorical practices in organizations: The impact of social media on internal communications

While intranets have become a central information hub for employees in different parts of an organization, they have also played a key role as a rhetorical tool for senior managers. With the advent of social media, this is increasingly so. How such technologies as these are incorporated into organizations' 'rhetorical practices' is an important, yet under-researched topic. To explore this research agenda, we examine the effects of social media on established and emerging flows of rhetorical practices in organizations, focusing in particular on the expanding, and in some cases switching, roles played by senior management and employees. We conceptualize organizational rhetorical practices as the combination of strategic intent, message and media, and discuss the interplay between rhetors and their audience. Adopting an interpretive, multiple case study approach, we study the use of social media in three multi-national organizations in the telecommunications industry. Our findings reveal that social media enable and facilitate the shaping of organizational rhetorical practices by (i) adding multivocality; (ii) increasing reach and richness in communication, and (iii) enabling simultaneous consumption and co-production of rhetorical content.

[1]  P. Jarzabkowski Strategy as Practice: Recursiveness, Adaptation, and Practices-in-Use , 2004 .

[2]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[3]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  JSIS Editorial - Special Issue on "Trust in the Digital Economy" , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[4]  John A. A. Sillince,et al.  A Contingency Theory of Rhetorical Congruence , 2005 .

[5]  Victoria L. Crittenden,et al.  We're all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem , 2011 .

[6]  Karen Beck,et al.  The Strategic Communication Imperative , 2005 .

[7]  João Baptista,et al.  INSTITUTIONALIZATION AS A PROCESS OF INTERPLAY BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY AND ITS ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT OF USE. , 2008 .

[8]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[9]  Eero Vaara,et al.  A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations , 2008 .

[10]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  Organizing for Fluidity? Dilemmas of New Organizational Forms , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[11]  A. Winger Face-to-face communication: Is it really necessary in a digitizing world? , 2005 .

[12]  K. Weick Making Sense of the Organization , 2000 .

[13]  Andrew D. Brown,et al.  Multiple organizational identities and legitimacy: The rhetoric of police websites , 2009 .

[14]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[15]  Walter Skok,et al.  Evaluating the role and effectiveness of an intranet in facilitating knowledge management: a case study at Surrey County Council , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[17]  Jörgen Skågeby,et al.  Gift-giving as a conceptual framework: framing social behavior in online networks , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[18]  Eero Vaara,et al.  Struggles Over Legitimacy in Global Organizational Restructuring: A Rhetorical Perspective on Legitimation Strategies and Dynamics in a Shutdown Case , 2010 .

[19]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Internationalization in a business school: Co-existing and entwined professional and organizational narratives , 2007 .

[20]  Jorgen P. Bansler,et al.  Corporate Intranet Implementation: Managing Emergent Technologies and Organizational Practices , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Sarah Kaplan Framing Contests: Strategy Making Under Uncertainty , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[22]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Andrew McAfee,et al.  Enterprise 2.0: New Collaborative Tools for Your Organization's Toughest Challenges , 2009 .

[24]  Bruno S. Silvestre,et al.  Social Media? Get Serious! Understanding the Functional Building Blocks of Social Media , 2011 .

[25]  Richard E. Crable,et al.  Managing issues and influencing public policy , 1985 .

[26]  Chris Halliburton,et al.  How do major European companies communicate their corporate identity across countries? - An empirical investigation of corporate internet communications , 2009 .

[27]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  O Brother, Where are Thou? , 2004 .

[28]  Carolyn A. Lin Webcasting Adoption: Technology Fluidity,-User 'Innovativeness, and Media Substitution , 2004 .

[29]  Sue Newell,et al.  Knowledge integration processes and dynamics within the context of cross-functional projects , 2003 .

[30]  Leyland Pitt,et al.  Just when you thought it was safe to go back into the Web: Marketing meets Web 2.0, social media, and creative consumers , 2011 .

[31]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  The importance of rhetoric in conceptualising IS adoption , 2011, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[32]  James D. Berkley,et al.  Beyond the Hype: Rediscovering the Essence of Management , 1992 .

[33]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[34]  Christopher Barnatt,et al.  Beyond Networks and Hierarchies: Latent Organizations in the U.K. Television Industry , 2000 .

[35]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Strategic ambiguity as a rhetorical resource for enabling multiple interests , 2010 .

[36]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[37]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  User acceptance and corporate intranet quality: An evaluation with iQual , 2012, Inf. Manag..

[38]  Wendell Bell,et al.  The Third Wave. , 1982 .

[39]  Xin Li,et al.  Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[40]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[41]  John M. T. Balmer,et al.  Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing ‐ Seeing through the fog , 2001 .

[42]  S. Newell,et al.  From global knowledge management to internal electronic fences: contradictory outcomes of intranet development , 2001 .

[43]  Sue Newell,et al.  Paradoxical effects of institutionalisation on the strategic awareness of technology in organisations , 2010, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[44]  S. Fournier,et al.  The Uninvited Brand , 2010 .

[45]  Daniel J. Lair,et al.  Corporate Rhetoric as Organizational Discourse , 2004 .

[46]  Richard E. Crable “Organizational rhetoric” as the fourth great system: Theoretical, critical, and pragmatic implications , 1990 .

[47]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[48]  R. Whittington Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research , 2006 .

[49]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy , 2005 .

[50]  Mariano Corso,et al.  An empirical roadmap for intranet evolution , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[51]  G. Harindranath,et al.  Getting Acceptance that Radically New Working Practices are Required: Institutionalization of Arguments about Change within a Healthcare Organization , 2001 .

[52]  Patrick Finnegan,et al.  Managing empowerment and control in an intranet environment , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[53]  Andrew D. Brown,et al.  Dress and Identity: A Turkish Case Study , 2002 .

[54]  BoudreauMarie-Claude,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology , 1999 .

[55]  Paul M. Hirsch,et al.  From Ambushes to Golden Parachutes: Corporate Takeovers as an Instance of Cultural Framing and Institutional Integration , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[56]  P. Evans,et al.  Strategy and the new economics of information. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[57]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[58]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory , 2001 .

[59]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Rhetorical diffusion and internal ambidexterity: emerging challenges and approaches in using social media inside organizations , 2011 .

[60]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  CROSSROADS - Microfoundations of Performance: Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[61]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[62]  E. Machen,et al.  Corporate identity. , 1987, Group practice journal.

[63]  George Cheney,et al.  Organizational rhetoric and the practice of criticism , 1990 .

[64]  Barney Tan,et al.  Demystifying case research: A structured-pragmatic-situational (SPS) approach to conducting case studies , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[65]  João Baptista,et al.  Institutionalisation as a process of interplay between technology and its organisational context of use , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[66]  S. E. Green,et al.  A Rhetorical Theory of Diffusion , 2004 .

[67]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Taking the Linguistic Turn in Organizational Research , 2000 .