Stochastic NANOG fluctuations allow mouse embryonic stem cells to explore pluripotency

Heterogeneous expression of the transcription factor NANOG has been linked to the existence of various functional states in pluripotent stem cells. This heterogeneity seems to arise from fluctuations of Nanog expression in individual cells, but a thorough characterization of these fluctuations and their impact on the pluripotent state is still lacking. Here, we have used a novel fluorescent reporter to investigate the temporal dynamics of NANOG expression in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), and to dissect the lineage potential of mESCs at different NANOG states. Our results show that stochastic NANOG fluctuations are widespread in mESCs, with essentially all expressing cells showing fluctuations in NANOG levels, even when cultured in ground-state conditions (2i media). We further show that fluctuations have similar kinetics when mESCs are cultured in standard conditions (serum plus leukemia inhibitory factor) or ground-state conditions, implying that NANOG fluctuations are inherent to the pluripotent state. We have then compared the developmental potential of low-NANOG and high-NANOG mESCs, grown in different conditions, and confirm that mESCs are more susceptible to enter differentiation at the low-NANOG state. Further analysis by gene expression profiling reveals that low-NANOG cells have marked expression of lineage-affiliated genes, with variable profiles according to the signalling environment. By contrast, high-NANOG cells show a more stable expression profile in different environments, with minimal expression of lineage markers. Altogether, our data support a model in which stochastic NANOG fluctuations provide opportunities for mESCs to explore multiple lineage options, modulating their probability to change functional state.

[1]  Patrick S. Stumpf,et al.  Nanog-dependent feedback loops regulate murine embryonic stem cell heterogeneity , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[2]  Ben D. MacArthur,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of Pluripotency , 2013, Cell.

[3]  Austin G Smith,et al.  The ground state of pluripotency. , 2010, Biochemical Society transactions.

[4]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Single-cell analysis reveals that expression of nanog is biallelic and equally variable as that of other pluripotency factors in mouse ESCs. , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[5]  Hitoshi Niwa,et al.  A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells , 2009, Nature.

[6]  B. Doble,et al.  The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal , 2008, Nature.

[7]  C. Lim,et al.  Regulated Fluctuations in Nanog Expression Mediate Cell Fate Decisions in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2009, PLoS biology.

[8]  Jennifer Nichols,et al.  Promotion of Reprogramming to Ground State Pluripotency by Signal Inhibition , 2008, PLoS biology.

[9]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Allele-specific detection of single mRNA molecules in situ , 2013, Nature Methods.

[10]  T. Hiiragi,et al.  Stochastic Processes during Mouse Blastocyst Patterning , 2008, Cells Tissues Organs.

[11]  Wolfgang Huber,et al.  Cell-to-cell expression variability followed by signal reinforcement progressively segregates early mouse lineages , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[12]  J. Nichols,et al.  Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development , 2007, Nature.

[13]  Ge Guo,et al.  Nanog Is the Gateway to the Pluripotent Ground State , 2009, Cell.

[14]  A. Sharov,et al.  Totipotent Embryonic Stem Cells Arise in Ground-State Culture Conditions , 2013, Cell reports.

[15]  Janet Rossant,et al.  FGF signal-dependent segregation of primitive endoderm and epiblast in the mouse blastocyst , 2010, Development.

[16]  N. Terada,et al.  A Heterogeneous Expression Pattern for Nanog in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2007, Stem cells.

[17]  Heiko Lickert,et al.  Biallelic expression of nanog protein in mouse embryonic stem cells. , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[18]  Sui Huang.  Non-genetic heterogeneity of cells in development: more than just noise , 2009, Development.

[19]  Richard A Young,et al.  Control of the Embryonic Stem Cell State , 2011, Cell.

[20]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  A Model-Based Analysis of Culture-Dependent Phenotypes of mESCs , 2014, PloS one.

[21]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation of Lineage Commitment - A Stochastic Model of Cell Fate Decisions , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  D. Henrique,et al.  Generation and Characterization of a Novel Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Line with a Dynamic Reporter of Nanog Expression , 2013, PloS one.

[23]  Oliver H. Tam,et al.  Mechanisms of pluripotency in vivo and in vitro. , 2014, Current topics in developmental biology.

[24]  Nicola Festuccia,et al.  OCT4/SOX2‐independent Nanog autorepression modulates heterogeneous Nanog gene expression in mouse ES cells , 2012, The EMBO journal.

[25]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Nanog Variability and Pluripotency Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cells - Insights from a Mathematical Model Analysis , 2010, PloS one.

[26]  R. Sandberg,et al.  Single-Cell RNA-Seq Reveals Dynamic, Random Monoallelic Gene Expression in Mammalian Cells , 2014, Science.

[27]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Transcriptional Dynamics of the Embryonic Stem Cell Switch , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  Jordi Garcia-Ojalvo,et al.  A competitive protein interaction network buffers Oct4-mediated differentiation to promote pluripotency in embryonic stem cells , 2013, Molecular systems biology.

[29]  Scott A. Rifkin,et al.  Imaging individual mRNA molecules using multiple singly labeled probes , 2008, Nature Methods.

[30]  J. Nichols,et al.  Naive and primed pluripotent states. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[31]  H. Niwa,et al.  Identification and characterization of subpopulations in undifferentiated ES cell culture , 2008, Development.

[32]  Austin G Smith,et al.  Capturing Pluripotency , 2008, Cell.

[33]  Janet Rossant,et al.  The role of FGF/Erk signaling in pluripotent cells , 2010, Development.

[34]  J. Nichols,et al.  BMP Induction of Id Proteins Suppresses Differentiation and Sustains Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal in Collaboration with STAT3 , 2003, Cell.

[35]  M. Ramalho-Santos,et al.  Open chromatin in pluripotency and reprogramming , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[36]  M. Torres-Padilla,et al.  Control of ground-state pluripotency by allelic regulation of Nanog , 2012, Nature.

[37]  H. Niwa,et al.  A liaison between intrinsic and extrinsic regulators of pluripotency , 2013, The EMBO journal.

[38]  Juan F. Poyatos,et al.  Multistable Decision Switches for Flexible Control of Epigenetic Differentiation , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  C. Ahn,et al.  Nanog regulates molecules involved in stemness and cell cycle‐signaling pathway for maintenance of pluripotency of P19 embryonal carcinoma stem cells , 2012, Journal of cellular physiology.

[40]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Inferring rules of lineage commitment in haematopoiesis , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[41]  J. Nichols,et al.  Suppression of Erk signalling promotes ground state pluripotency in the mouse embryo , 2009, Development.

[42]  M. Babu,et al.  Dissecting ensemble networks in ES cell populations reveals micro-heterogeneity underlying pluripotency. , 2012, Molecular bioSystems.