Sensor Scheduling for Space Object Tracking and Collision Alert

Given the increasingly dense environment in both low-earth orbit (LEO) and geostationary orbit (GEO), a sudden change in the trajectory of any existing resident space object (RSO) may cause potential collision damage to space assets. With a constellation of EO/IR sensor platforms and ground radar surveillance systems, it is important to design optimal estimation algorithm for updating nonlinear object states and allocating sensing resources to effectively avoid collisions among many RSOs. We consider N space objects being observed by M sensors whose task is to provide the minimum mean square estimation error of the overall system subject to the cost associated with each measurement. To simplify the analysis, we assume that sensors can switch between objects instantaneously subject to additional resource and sensing geometry constraints. We first formulate the sensor scheduling problem using the optimal control formalism and then derive a tractable relaxation of the original optimization problem, which provides a lower bound on the achievable performance. We propose an open-loop periodic switching policy whose performance can approach the theoretical lower bound closely. We also discuss a special case of identical sensors and derive an index policy that coincides with the general solution to restless multi-armed bandit problem by Whittle. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the resulting sensor management scheme for space situational awareness using a realistic space object tracking simulator with both unintentional and intentional maneuvers by RSOs that may lead to collision. Our sensor scheduling scheme outperforms the conventional information gain and covariance control based schemes in the overall tracking accuracy as well as making earlier declaration of collision events.

[1]  W. Gilks,et al.  Following a moving target—Monte Carlo inference for dynamic Bayesian models , 2001 .

[2]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I , 1968 .

[3]  Panos M. Pardalos,et al.  Mathematical Programming Techniques for Sensor Networks , 2009, Algorithms.

[4]  Erik Blasch,et al.  Comparison of several space target tracking filters , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[5]  P. Houtekamer,et al.  Data Assimilation Using an Ensemble Kalman Filter Technique , 1998 .

[6]  H. V. Trees Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .

[7]  G. Evensen Data Assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2006 .

[8]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  An Information-Based Approach to Sensor Management in Large Dynamic Networks , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  Gérard Verfaillie,et al.  Selecting and scheduling observations of agile satellites , 2002 .

[10]  Dinh-Tuan Pham,et al.  Improving the singular evolutive extended Kalman filter for strongly nonlinear models for use in ocean data assimilation , 2001 .

[11]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  Estimation theory with applications to communications and control , 1979 .

[12]  F. Daum Nonlinear filters: beyond the Kalman filter , 2005, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[13]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .

[14]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation: Theory, Algorithms and Software , 2001 .

[15]  Cheng-Shang Chang,et al.  Birkhoff-von Neumann input buffered crossbar switches , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[16]  Vesselin P. Jilkov,et al.  A survey of maneuvering target tracking: approximation techniques for nonlinear filtering , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[17]  Nevio Carpanese Periodic Riccati difference equations: approaching equilibria by implicit systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[18]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[19]  Panos M. Pardalos,et al.  Robust multi-sensor scheduling for multi-site surveillance , 2011, J. Comb. Optim..

[20]  Sudipto Guha,et al.  Approximation algorithms for budgeted learning problems , 2007, STOC '07.

[21]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  The Complexity of Optimal Queuing Network Control , 1999, Math. Oper. Res..

[22]  Dimitrios Charalampidis,et al.  Designing Collision Alert System for Space Situational Awareness , 2010 .

[23]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[24]  N. Gordon,et al.  Novel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation , 1993 .

[25]  J. Niño-Mora RESTLESS BANDITS, PARTIAL CONSERVATION LAWS AND INDEXABILITY , 2001 .

[26]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice , 2001, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[27]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  The complexity of optimal queueing network control , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE 9th Annual Conference on Structure in Complexity Theory.

[28]  Huimin Chen,et al.  Orbital Evasive Target Tracking and Sensor Management , 2010 .

[29]  Genshe Chen,et al.  A range rate based detection technique for tracking a maneuvering target , 2005, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[30]  P. Whittle Restless bandits: activity allocation in a changing world , 1988, Journal of Applied Probability.

[31]  F. Daum Exact finite dimensional nonlinear filters , 1985, 1985 24th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[32]  M. Kalandros Covariance control for multisensor systems , 2002 .

[33]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.