The Choice Between Joint Venture and Wholly Owned Subsidiary: An Institutional Perspective

The study of foreign entry-mode choice has been based almost exclusively on transaction-cost theory. This theory focuses mainly on the impacts of firm- and industry-specific factors on the choice of entry mode, taking the effects of country-specific contextual factors as constant or less important. In contrast, the institutional perspective emphasizes the importance of the influence of both institutional forces embedded in national environments and decision makers' cognitive constraints on the founding conditions of new ventures. Still, this theoretical perspective has yet to provide insights into how institutional factors influence the choice of foreign entry mode. The primary goal of the present study is to provide a unifying theoretical framework to examine this relationship. We synthesize transaction-cost and institutional perspectives to analyze a sample of 364 Japanese overseas subsidiaries. Our results support the notion that institutional theory provides incremental explanatory power of foreign entry-mode choice in addition to transaction-cost theory. In particular, we found that multinational enterprises tend to conform to the regulative settings of the host-country environment, the normative pressures imposed by the local people, and the cognitive mindsets as bounded by counterparts' and multinational enterprises' own entry patterns when making foreign entry-mode choices.

[1]  YiuDaphne,et al.  The Choice Between Joint Venture and Wholly Owned Subsidiary , 2002 .

[2]  O. Williamson.  Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[3]  H. Barkema,et al.  International Expansion Through Start-Up or Acquisition: A Learning Perspective , 1998 .

[4]  W. Shan,et al.  Country—specific advantage and international cooperation , 1991 .

[5]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[6]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Chance, Imitative, and Strategic Antecedents to Multimarket Contact , 1999 .

[7]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Organizational Environments and the Multinational Enterprise , 1991 .

[8]  Benjamin Gomes-Casseres,et al.  Firm Ownership Preferences and Host Government Restrictions: An Integrated Approach , 1990 .

[9]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[10]  M. Porter.  Competition in Global Industries , 1986 .

[11]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  W. Shan,et al.  Environmental Risks and Joint Venture Sharing Arrangements , 1991 .

[13]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1992 .

[14]  J. Robins,et al.  Organizational Economics: Notes on the Use of Transaction-Cost Theory in the Study of Organizations. , 1987 .

[15]  Kent E. Neupert,et al.  National Culture, Transaction Costs, and the Choice Between Joint Venture and Wholly Owned Subsidiary , 2000 .

[16]  Henry W. Lane,et al.  The Psychic Distance Paradox , 1996 .

[17]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[18]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[19]  Odd Nordhaug,et al.  Institutional and Rational Determinants of Organizational Practices: Human Resource Management in European Firms , 1999 .

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[21]  Farok J. Contractor,et al.  Ownership Patterns of U.S. Joint Ventures Abroad and the Liberalization of Foreign Government Regulations in the 1980s: Evidence from the Benchmark Surveys , 1990 .

[22]  J. Hennart,et al.  The Impact of Culture on the Strategy of Multinational Enterprises: Does National Origin Affect Ownership Decisions? , 1998 .

[23]  Peter W. Roberts,et al.  Integrating Transaction Cost and Institutional Theories: Toward a Constrained-Efficiency Framework for Understanding Organizational Design Adoption , 1997 .

[24]  Witold J. Henisz.  The Institutional Environment for Multinational Investment , 2000 .

[25]  S. Shane.  THE EFFECT OF NATIONAL CULTURE ON THE CHOICE BETWEEN LICENSING AND DIRECT FOREIGN INVESTMENT , 1994 .

[26]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[27]  B. Kogut.  Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1988 .

[28]  T. Kostova,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise , 1999 .

[29]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism , 1994 .

[30]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism , 1996 .

[31]  N. Fligstein,et al.  The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979 , 1985 .

[32]  J. Hennart,et al.  A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures , 1988 .

[33]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. , 1993 .

[34]  M. Erramilli,et al.  Nationality and Subsidiary Ownership Patterns in Multinational Corporations , 1996 .

[35]  D. Eleanor Westney,et al.  Institutionalization Theory and the Multinational Corporation , 1993 .

[36]  C. P. Rao,et al.  Choice of Foreign Market Entry Modes by Service Firms: Role of Market Knowledge , 1990 .

[37]  Louis T. Wells,et al.  Bargaining Power of Multinationals and Host Governments , 1982 .

[38]  Andrew Delios,et al.  Local Knowledge Transfer and Performance: Implications for Alliance Formation in Asia , 1996 .

[39]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty , 1997 .

[40]  Jennifer L. Merolla,et al.  The Politics of Major Policy Reform in Postwar America: Follow the Leader , 2014 .

[41]  O. Shenkar,et al.  Clustering Countries on Attitudinal Dimensions: A Review and Synthesis , 1985 .

[42]  T. Kostova.  Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective , 1999 .

[43]  Thomas Poynter,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and Government Intervention , 1985 .

[44]  D. Lecraw.  Bargaining Power, Ownership, and Profitability of Transnational Corporations in Developing Countries , 1984 .

[45]  Peter S. Davis,et al.  Mode of International Entry: An Isomorphism Perspective , 2000 .

[46]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  A Managerial Decision Model of International Cooperative Venture Formation , 1994 .

[47]  H. Gatignon,et al.  Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions , 1986 .

[48]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode , 1988 .

[49]  M. Tina Dacin,et al.  Efficiency Motives and Normative Forces: Combining Transactions Costs and Institutional Logic: , 1999 .

[50]  H. Barkema,et al.  FOREIGN ENTRY, CULTURAL BARRIERS, AND LEARNING , 1996 .

[51]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Ownership Strategy of Japanese Firms: Transactional, Institutional and Experience Influences , 1999 .

[52]  Benjamin Gomes-Casseres,et al.  Ownership structures of foreign subsidiaries : Theory and evidence , 1989 .

[53]  H. Gatignon,et al.  The multinational corporation's degree of control over foreign subsidiaries : an empirical test of a transaction cost explanation , 1988 .

[54]  James William Coleman,et al.  Competition and the Structure of Industrial Society: Reply to Braithwaite , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[55]  R. I. Sutton,et al.  Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: a study of drug abuse treatment units. , 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[56]  Prasad Padmanabhan,et al.  Decision Specific Experience in Foreign Ownership and Establishment Strategies: Evidence from Japanese Firms , 1999 .

[57]  Sanjaya Lall,et al.  The Multinational Corporation , 1980 .

[58]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[59]  J. Hennart,et al.  The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: an empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the united states , 1991 .

[60]  M. Dacin,et al.  Isomorphism In Context: The Power And Prescription Of Institutional Norms , 1997 .

[61]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Inertia, environments and strategic choice: a quasi-experimental design for comparative-longitudinal research , 1986 .

[62]  Dimaggio,et al.  Structures of capital : the social organization of the economy , 1990 .

[63]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[64]  Terry L. Amburgey,et al.  Strategic momentum: The effects of repetitive, positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity , 1992 .

[65]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[66]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[67]  Heather A. Haveman.  Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets , 1993 .

[68]  Frank Robotka,et al.  A Theory of Cooperation , 1947 .

[69]  Kang Rae Cho,et al.  Ownership Strategy for a Foreign Affiliate: An Empirical Investigation of Japanese Firms , 1996 .

[70]  Sanjeev Agarwal,et al.  Socio-Cultural Distance and the Choice of Joint Ventures: A Contingency Perspective , 1994 .

[71]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Performance and Survival of Joint Ventures with Non-Conventional Ownership Structures , 1998 .

[72]  Witold J. Henisz,et al.  Japanese Firms' Investment Strategies in Emerging Economies , 2000 .

[73]  W. C. Kim,et al.  Global Strategy and Multinationals' Entry Mode Choice , 1992 .

[74]  John W. Clarr.  Cooperative Strategies in International Business , 1990 .

[75]  Howard Thomas,et al.  Strategic Discovery: Competing in New Arenas , 1997 .