A conceptual comparison between discrete and continuous simulation to motivate the hybrid simulation methodology

The aim of this essay is to encourage the application of the hybrid simulation, combining the discrete and the continuous simulation methodologies. With a conceptual literature review of discrete (Discrete Event) and the continuous (System Dynamics) simulation methodologies that reveals their main features and potential of applicability, it is possible to define the potential of developing hybrid simulation models. The integration of both methodologies in a single model allows the expansion of the comprehension spectrum of the system, with the possibility of integrating the physical and dimensional aspects to policy and behavior patterns, revealing the hybrid methodology as a powerful tool to succeed in the highly demanding business world.

[1]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation Modeling and Analysis , 1982 .

[2]  Magdy Helal,et al.  A HYBRID SYSTEM DYNAMICS-DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATION APPROACH TO SIMULATING THE MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISE , 2008 .

[3]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling with DYNAMO , 1981 .

[4]  Bengt Lindberg,et al.  Aggregate analysis of manufacturing systems using system dynamics and ANP , 2005, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[5]  A. Borshchev,et al.  From System Dynamics and Discrete Event to Practical Agent Based Modeling : Reasons , Techniques , Tools , 2004 .

[6]  Andersen Consultng,et al.  A Comparison of System Dynamics ( SD ) and Discrete Event Simulation ( DES ) , 1999 .

[7]  J Swanson,et al.  Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[8]  Tim Baines,et al.  A generic methodology that aids the application of system dynamics to manufacturing system modelling , 1998 .

[9]  Stewart Robinson,et al.  Comparing model development in Discrete Event Simulation and System Dynamics , 2009, Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[10]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Towards a System of Systems Methodologies , 1984 .

[11]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[12]  H. Akkermans.  Modelling with managers : participative business modelling for effective strategic decision-making , 1995 .

[13]  Stewart Robinson,et al.  Comparing discrete-event simulation and system dynamics: users' perceptions , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[14]  R. G. Coyle.  Representing Discrete Events in System Dynamics Models: A Theoretical Application to Modelling Coal Production , 1985 .

[15]  J. Forrester.  Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[16]  Stewart Robinson,et al.  Discrete-event simulation: from the pioneers to the present, what next? , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[17]  Jane Edghill,et al.  The use of system dynamics in manufacturing systems engineering , 1989 .

[18]  Sally C. Brailsford,et al.  A comparison of discrete event simulation and system dynamics for modelling health care systems , 2001 .

[19]  Albert T. Jones,et al.  Enterprise simulation: a hybrid system approach , 2005, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[20]  Andrew Greasley,et al.  A comparison of system dynamics and discrete event simulation , 2009 .

[21]  J. Sterman.  Business Dynamics , 2000 .

[22]  Albert T. Jones,et al.  A methodology for Integrating and Synchronizing the System Dynamics and Discrete Event Simulation Paradigms , 2007 .