The embodied nature of spatial perspective taking: Embodied transformation versus sensorimotor interference

Humans are able to mentally adopt the spatial perspective of others and understand the world from their point of view. We propose that spatial perspective taking (SPT) could have developed from the physical alignment of perspectives. This would support the notion that others have put forward claiming that SPT is an embodied cognitive process. We investigated this issue by contrasting several accounts in terms of the assumed processes and the nature of the embodiment. In a series of four experiments we found substantial evidence that the transformations during SPT comprise large parts of the body schema, which we did not observe for object rotation. We further conclude that the embodiment of SPT is best conceptualised as the self-initiated emulation of a body movement, supporting the notion of endogenous motoric embodiment. Overall our results are much more in agreement with an 'embodied' transformation account than with the notion of sensorimotor interference. Finally we discuss our findings in terms of SPT as a possible evolutionary stepping stone towards more complex alignments of socio-cognitive perspectives.

[1]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Do simple intransitive finger movements consistently activate frontoparietal mirror neuron areas in humans? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[2]  L. Herman,et al.  Dolphin Social Cognition and Joint Attention: Our Current Understanding , 2006 .

[3]  O. Blanke,et al.  Neural Basis of Embodiment: Distinct Contributions of Temporoparietal Junction and Extrastriate Body Area , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Günther Knoblich,et al.  The Social Nature of Perception and Action , 2006 .

[5]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Mental rotation of objects versus hands: neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Reinhard Moratz,et al.  Spatial Reference in Linguistic Human-Robot Interaction: Iterative, Empirically Supported Development of a Model of Projective Relations , 2006, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[7]  MICHAEL TOMASELLO,et al.  Five primate species follow the visual gaze of conspecifics , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  J. Thayer,et al.  The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: a multivariate solution. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[9]  C C Presson,et al.  Updating after Rotational and Translational Body Movements: Coordinate Structure of Perspective Space , 1994, Perception.

[10]  Jennifer M. Shephard,et al.  Imagined rotations of self versus objects: an fMRI study , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog, causal ape. , 2006, Journal of comparative psychology.

[12]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Action generation and action perception in imitation: an instance of the ideomotor principle. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[13]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Sarah S. Chance,et al.  Spatial Updating of Self-Position and Orientation During Real, Imagined, and Virtual Locomotion , 1998 .

[15]  M K Kaiser,et al.  MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: an extensive primer. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  M. Hegarty,et al.  A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[17]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  James A. Thomson,et al.  On-Line Updating of Spatial Information Druing Locomotion Without Vision. , 1999, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Dynamic Representations of Human Body Movement , 1999, Perception.

[20]  Alexander Münchau,et al.  Investigating the human mirror neuron system by means of cortical synchronization during the imitation of biological movements , 2006, NeuroImage.

[21]  Dale J. Barr,et al.  Establishing conventional communication systems: Is common knowledge necessary? , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  B. Tversky,et al.  Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking , 2009, Cognition.

[23]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Embodied Language: A Review of the Role of the Motor System in Language Comprehension , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  P. Mundy,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Attention, Joint Attention, and Social Cognition , 2022 .

[25]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Perspective taking and ellipsis in spatial descriptions , 1996 .

[26]  M. Hegarty,et al.  A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities , 2004 .

[27]  Fredrik Wartenberg,et al.  Rotations and translations in body-centered space: models and experiments , 1995 .

[28]  Brice Isableu,et al.  Embodied spatial transformations: "body analogy" for the mental rotation of objects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  Maryjane Wraga,et al.  Thinking outside the body: an advantage for spatial updating during imagined versus physical self-rotation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  M. Kozhevnikov,et al.  Perspective-Taking vs. Mental Rotation Transformations and How They Predict Spatial Navigation Performance. , 2006 .

[31]  K. Zilles,et al.  Neural Correlates of First-Person Perspective as One Constituent of Human Self-Consciousness , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  S. Tipper,et al.  Predictive Gaze Cues and Personality Judgments , 2006, Psychological science.

[33]  Michael L. Davidson Univariate versus multivariate tests in repeated-measures experiments. , 1972 .

[34]  D. Perrett,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.8 No.11 November 2004 Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective , 2022 .

[35]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  Mental rotation and the perspective problem , 1973 .

[37]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Linking Out-of-Body Experience and Self Processing to Mental Own-Body Imagery at the Temporoparietal Junction , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  A. Sack,et al.  Object- and direction-specific interference between manual and mental rotation , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  A. Wohlschläger,et al.  Mental and manual rotation. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Spatial updating in virtual reality: the sufficiency of visual information , 2007, Psychological research.

[41]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[42]  Gudula Retz-Schmidt,et al.  Various Views on Spatial Prepositions , 1988, AI Mag..

[43]  D R Proffitt,et al.  The influence of spatial reference frames on imagined object- and viewer rotations. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[44]  Kenny R. Coventry,et al.  Seeing, saying and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions , 2004 .

[45]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Implicit transfer of motor strategies in mental rotation , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[46]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Two kinds of visual perspective taking , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  M. May,et al.  Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: Transformation versus interference accounts , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Modulation of neural activity by angle of rotation during imagined spatial transformations , 2006, NeuroImage.

[49]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Beyond imagination: Perspective change problems revisited , 2005 .

[50]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Imagined Viewer and Object Rotations Dissociated with Event-Related fMRI , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective , 1990 .

[52]  J. Call,et al.  The use of experimenter-given cues by South African fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus) , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[53]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  All great ape species follow gaze to distant locations and around barriers. , 2005, Journal of comparative psychology.

[54]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Spatial updating relies on an egocentric representation of space: Effects of the number of objects , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[55]  S. Levinson,et al.  LANGUAGE AND SPACE , 1996 .

[56]  J. Rieser Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  C. Frith,et al.  Social Cognition in Humans , 2007, Current Biology.

[58]  M. Pickering,et al.  Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  George A. Miller,et al.  Factors Affecting the Use of Dimensional Prepositions in German and American English: Object Orientation, Social Context, and Prepositional Pattern , 2000 .

[60]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Mental spatial transformations of objects and perspective , 2001, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[61]  Sheba Heptulla Chatterjee,et al.  Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Modulation of cortical activity during different imitative behaviors. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[63]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. , 2003, Journal of comparative psychology.

[64]  Irwin N. Jankovic,et al.  Principles of spatial problem solving. , 1982 .

[65]  M. Just,et al.  Graded Functional Activation in the Visuospatial System with the Amount of Task Demand , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[66]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Transformations of visuospatial images. , 2005, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.