Comparing measurements methods of carbon dioxide fluxes in a soil sequence under land use and cover change in North Eastern Spain

Abstract Carbon dioxide measurements from soil surface may indicate the potential for soil respiration and carbon consumption according to microbial biomass and root activity. These processes may be influenced by land use and cover change, and abandonment especially in the upper soil organic layer. Seven environments from cultivation to late abandonment, with the same soil type classified as Lithic Xerorthent, were tested to ascertain the respiration capacity according to the current use and cover, and to establish the ability to preserve and eventually increase the organic matter pools after abandonment. Given the importance of carbon dioxide measurements at soil surface, a comparison between the classic soda lime method (SL) and a rapid method based on infrared sensor analyzer (IR) was performed from autumn 2008 to autumn 2009 in the field. The field measurements of CO 2 proved significant correlations between the values from the two techniques under the same natural conditions and along the period of observation. However, the values of CO 2 measured by the soda lime method were always higher than those obtained by the infrared analyzer. This pattern was attributed to the difference in time of measurement, larger in the former method, and type of measurement technique. Despite that the trend of measured CO 2 values was rather similar along the year. On average, the highest values of CO 2 emission in the field were recorded in the warmest periods of the year and with soil surface moisture not lower than 3% independently on the method used. High soil surface temperature with soil moisture below 3% decreased drastically the CO 2 production from the dry soil. The cultivated environments and soil under forests have resulted higher CO 2 producers than abandoned soils depending on the age of abandonment, climatic conditions, and within abandonment perturbations. Those abandoned soils preserved by perturbations like wildfire showed a higher potential for accumulating organic carbon, as indicated by the lowest emission of CO 2 with respect to SOC content, during the period of observation. Results demonstrated the reliability of the methods used to evaluate the soil carbon dioxide production capacity and allowed to classify through environments with increasing potential for carbon sequestration. The classification was rather similar by using both methods indicating a higher susceptibility to carbon loss in the following order: soil under Vines (V) > under Olives (O) > under Pine trees (PI) > under Cork Trees (S) > under Pasture (PR) > under Cistus scrub (MC) > under Erica scrub (MB) by using the SL method and V > O > PI > S > MC > MB > PR by using the IR method. Indications about the need of management of abandoned areas were also considered in order to recover the landscape heterogeneity.

[1]  J. Magid,et al.  Soil surface CO2 flux as an index of soil respiration in situ: A comparison of two chamber methods , 1996 .

[2]  E. Rasmussen,et al.  A most beautiful polar low. A case study of a polar low development in the Bear Island region , 1992 .

[3]  W. Schlesinger,et al.  The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate , 1992 .

[4]  P. Brooks,et al.  A new automated technique for measuring respiration in soil samples , 1987, Plant and Soil.

[5]  D. Baldocchi Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future , 2003 .

[6]  P. Grogan CO2 FLUX MEASUREMENT USING SODA LIME: CORRECTION FOR WATER FORMED DURING CO2 ADSORPTION , 1998 .

[7]  R. Desjardins,et al.  Comparison of static and dynamic closed chambers for measurement of soil respiration under field conditions , 1992 .

[8]  C. Tucker,et al.  Northern hemisphere photosynthetic trends 1982–99 , 2003 .

[9]  G. Pardini,et al.  The role of land use-land cover on runoff generation and sediment yield at a microplot scale, in a small Mediterranean catchment , 2004 .

[10]  H. Koizumi,et al.  Seasonal changes in the contribution of root respiration to total soil respiration in a cool-temperate deciduous forest , 2003, Plant and Soil.

[11]  J. Burger,et al.  Estimating root respiration, microbial respiration in the rhizosphere, and root-free soil respiration in forest soils , 1998 .

[12]  N. Edwards The use of soda-lime for measuring respiration rates in terrestrial systems , 1982, Pedobiologia.

[13]  Andrew D. Friend,et al.  Modelling the impact of future changes in climate, CO2 concentration and land use on natural ecosystems and the terrestrial carbon sink , 2004 .

[14]  J. van der Plicht,et al.  Soil organic matter dynamics after the conversion of arable land to pasture , 1999, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[15]  Giovanni Pardini,et al.  Relative influence of wildfire on soil properties and erosion processes in different Mediterranean environments in NE Spain. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Anònim Anònim Keys to Soil Taxonomy , 2010 .

[17]  Elizabeth Pattey,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of soil respiration in agricultural fields , 1991 .

[18]  Nina Buchmann,et al.  Biotic and abiotic factors controlling soil respiration rates in Picea abies stands , 2000 .

[19]  Giovanni Pardini,et al.  Runoff erosion and nutrient depletion in five Mediterranean soils of NE Spain under different land use. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  R. Lal,et al.  Soil degradation by Erosion of a typic hapludalf in central Ohio and its rehabilitation , 1995 .

[21]  G. Pardini,et al.  Land use change effects on abandoned terraced soils in a Mediterranean catchment, NE Spain , 2003 .

[22]  R. Lal,et al.  Erosion effects on carbon dioxide concentration and carbon flux from an Ohio Alfisol. , 2000 .

[23]  G. Guggenberger,et al.  Factors controlling humification and mineralization of soil organic matter in the tropics , 1997 .

[24]  Jaime Porta Casanellas,et al.  Edafología: para la agricultura y el medio ambiente. , 1994 .

[25]  E. Davidson,et al.  Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest , 1998 .

[26]  H. Keith,et al.  Measurement of soil CO2 efflux using soda lime absorption: both quantitative and reliable , 2006 .

[27]  P. Nannipieri,et al.  Ecological significance of the biological activity in soil. , 1990 .