Using personalized 3D printed Titanium sleeve-prosthetic composite for reconstruction of severe segmental bone loss of proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty

Abstract Rationale: Allograft-prosthetic composites (APCs) and proximal femoral replacement have been applied for reconstruction of severe segmental femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty. The outcomes are encouraging but the complication rate is relatively high. Considering the high complication rates and mixed results of APCs and megaprosthesis, we presented a case using personalized 3D printed Titanium sleeve-prosthetic composite for reconstruction of segmental bone defect. Patient concerns: A 73-year-old woman presented to the emergency department on account of acute severe pain of the left hip without history of trauma. She had undergone a cemented total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of femoral head at the left side in 2000. In 2013 she underwent a cemented revision total hip arthroplasty as a result of aseptic loosening of hip prosthesis. She denied obvious discomfort prior to this episode since the revision surgery in 2013. Diagnosis: According to the clinical history, imaging and physical examination, we confirmed the diagnosis of severe segmental bone loss of proximal femur and fracture of prosthetic stem. The femoral bone defect was evaluated using the Paprosky classification system and rated as Type 3B, and the acetabular bone defect was rated as Type 2C. Interventions: In this study, we present the first case of severe segmental bone loss of proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty that was successfully treated using personalized 3D printed Titanium sleeve-prosthetic composite Outcomes: At the 2-year follow-up, the patient was symptom free with a Harris Hip Score of 91. Radiographs showed excellent osteointegration between the interface of sleeve-prosthetic composite and the host bone, with no signs of implant loosening or subsidence. Lessons: Despite the absence of long term results of 3D printed Titanium sleeve-prosthetic composite reconstruction, the good clinical and radiological outcome at 2 years follow up implied its potential role for reconstruction of segmental femoral bone defect in revision THA.

[1]  F. Sim,et al.  Proximal Femoral Allograft-Prosthetic Composites: Do They Really Restore Bone? A Retrospective Review of Revision Allograft-Prosthetic Composites. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  H. Malchau,et al.  Hip replacement , 2018, The Lancet.

[3]  Rajesh Malhotra,et al.  Megaprosthesis versus Allograft Prosthesis Composite for massive skeletal defects. , 2017, Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma.

[4]  Zhongjun Liu,et al.  3D Printing in Spine Surgery. , 2018, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[5]  J. Eckert,et al.  Additive Manufacturing Processes: Selective Laser Melting, Electron Beam Melting and Binder Jetting—Selection Guidelines , 2017, Materials.

[6]  I. Ilyas,et al.  Freeze Dried Proximal Femoral Allografts in Revision of Femoral Stems. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  Xiaoguang Liu,et al.  Reconstruction of the Upper Cervical Spine Using a Personalized 3D-Printed Vertebral Body in an Adolescent With Ewing Sarcoma , 2016, Spine.

[8]  D. Lewallen,et al.  Management of Femoral Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2015, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[9]  Peng Xiu,et al.  Enhanced angiogenesis and osteogenesis in critical bone defects by the controlled release of BMP-2 and VEGF: implantation of electron beam melting-fabricated porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds incorporating growth factor-doped fibrin glue , 2015, Biomedical materials.

[10]  H. Bauer,et al.  Megaprosthetic reconstruction for periprosthetic or highly comminuted fractures of the hip and knee , 2014, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[11]  R. Mayle,et al.  Massive bone loss: allograft-prosthetic composites and beyond. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  R. von Eisenhart-Rothe,et al.  Incidence and Outcome after Infection of Megaprostheses , 2012, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[13]  A. Gross,et al.  Proximal Femoral Allograft for Major Segmental Femoral Bone Loss: A Systematic Literature Review , 2011, Advances in orthopedics.

[14]  F. Sim,et al.  Proximal femoral allograft-prosthesis composites in revision hip replacement: a 12-year follow-up study. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  F. Sim,et al.  Proximal femoral replacement in patients with non-neoplastic conditions. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  Chia-Chen Hsu,et al.  Proximal femoral megaprosthesis for failed total hip arthroplasty. , 2007, Chang Gung medical journal.

[17]  M. Mazurkiewicz,et al.  Results of the megaprosthesis replacement reconstruction proximal femoral resection bone tumors. , 2005, Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja.

[18]  F. Sim,et al.  Proximal Femoral Replacements With Megaprostheses , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  R. Pant,et al.  Modular megaprosthesis for proximal femoral tumors , 2002, International Orthopaedics.

[20]  F. Sim,et al.  Proximal femoral replacement with megaprosthesis. , 2000, Instructional course lectures.

[21]  W. Paprosky,et al.  Classification of bone defects in failed prostheses. , 1994, La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento.