A novel hybrid MCDM model for machine tool selection using fuzzy DEMATEL, entropy weighting and later defuzzification VIKOR

Abstract Machine tool selection has been an important issue in the manufacturing industry because improper machine tool selection can have a negative effect on productivity, accuracy, flexibility, and the responsive manufacturing capabilities of a company. The current multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach of machine tool selection mostly focuses on the subjective perspective. However, as the objective evaluation represents the actual performance of machine tools, both subjective and objective perspectives need to be considered when choosing an appropriate machining tool. Therefore, this study proposes a machine tool selection method based on a novel hybrid MCDM model. Firstly, the presented method employs a comprehensive weight technique integrating subjective weights obtained using fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (FDEMATEL) with objective weights obtained using entropy weighting (EW). Secondly, later defuzzification VIKOR (LDVIKOR) is put forward to rank the optional alternatives. Finally, a case application verifies the effectiveness of the proposed method. The evaluation results indicate that the best and worst selected machine tool of the proposed method keeps high conformance with the actual ranking in real factory. Additionally, sensitivity analysis results of the effect of parameters φ on the decision outcome show that irrespective of the variations in this parameter, the best decision outcome will be not influenced. These indicate that the presented hybrid model has advantages in granting flexibility to the preferences of decision makers.

[1]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  An extended VIKOR method based on prospect theory for multiple attribute decision making under interval type-2 fuzzy environment , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[2]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples , 1968 .

[3]  Zeki Ayağ,et al.  Evaluating machine tool alternatives through modified TOPSIS and alpha-cut based fuzzy ANP , 2012 .

[4]  Ravi Kant,et al.  A hybrid approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL and FMCDM to predict success of knowledge management adoption in supply chain , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[5]  L. Anojkumar,et al.  Machine tool selection using AHP and VIKOR methodologies under fuzzy environment , 2012 .

[6]  Bülent Çatay,et al.  A decision support system for machine tool selection , 2004 .

[7]  Jiafu Su,et al.  A combined fuzzy DEMATEL and TOPSIS approach for estimating participants in knowledge-intensive crowdsourcing , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[8]  Yasir Ahmed Solangi,et al.  Evaluating the strategies for sustainable energy planning in Pakistan: An integrated SWOT-AHP and Fuzzy-TOPSIS approach , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[9]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for robot selection , 1993 .

[10]  Chia-Chi Sun,et al.  A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Market Segment Evaluation and Selection Based on Application of Fuzzy AHP and COPRAS-G Methods , 2012 .

[12]  M. Tiwari,et al.  A fuzzy goal-programming model of machine-tool selection and operation allocation problem in FMS: a quick converging simulated annealing-based approach , 2006 .

[13]  Maryam Ahmadi,et al.  Identifying critical success factors in Heart Failure Self-Care using fuzzy DEMATEL method , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[14]  Bülent Çatay,et al.  Development of a machine tool selection system using AHP , 2007 .

[15]  Xinguo Ming,et al.  Explore and evaluate innovative value propositions for smart product service system: A novel graphics-based rough-fuzzy DEMATEL method , 2020 .

[16]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[17]  Kuang-Chao Fan,et al.  Prediction of machining accuracy degradation of machine tools , 2012 .

[18]  Rifat Gürcan Özdemir,et al.  An intelligent approach to machine tool selection through fuzzy analytic network process , 2011, J. Intell. Manuf..

[19]  Zhang-peng Tian,et al.  An integrated approach for failure mode and effects analysis based on fuzzy best-worst, relative entropy, and VIKOR methods , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[20]  Randa Atta,et al.  A high payload steganography mechanism based on wavelet packet transformation and neutrosophic set , 2018, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[21]  Zeki Ayağ,et al.  A hybrid approach to machine-tool selection through AHP and simulation , 2007 .

[22]  J. Rezaei Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method , 2015 .

[23]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of regional clean energy development levels based on principal component analysis and rough set theory , 2018, Renewable Energy.

[24]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  A 2-dimension uncertain linguistic DEMATEL method for identifying critical success factors in emergency management , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[25]  İhsan Kaya,et al.  A comprehensive review of fuzzy multi criteria decision making methodologies for energy policy making , 2019, Energy Strategy Reviews.

[26]  Hideki Aoyama,et al.  A hybrid approach for fuzzy multi-attribute decision making in machine tool selection with consideration of the interactions of attributes , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  Florentin Smarandache,et al.  A hybrid neutrosophic multiple criteria group decision making approach for project selection , 2019, Cognitive Systems Research.

[28]  Fei Liu,et al.  A novel method for energy efficiency evaluation to support efficient machine tool selection , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[29]  Akperov Imran,et al.  The assessment of regional economic potential based on the methodology of fuzzy set theory , 2017 .

[30]  Majid Behzadian,et al.  Developing a Group Decision Support System for Advertising Media Evaluation: A Case in the Middle East , 2016 .

[31]  Muhammet Gulź,et al.  A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications , 2016 .

[32]  Dao Yin,et al.  A rough-fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP method for evaluating sustainable value requirement of product service system , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[33]  Alireza Sotoudeh-Anvari,et al.  A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems , 2017 .

[34]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara) , 2010 .

[35]  Wenyan Song,et al.  A rough DEMATEL-based approach for evaluating interaction between requirements of product-service system , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[36]  R. Westbrook,et al.  SWOT Analysis: It's Time for a Product Recall , 1997 .

[37]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[38]  Rahul Rai,et al.  Machine-tool selection and operation allocation in FMS: Solving a fuzzy goal-programming model using a genetic algorithm , 2002 .

[39]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[40]  Guo Hongyu Research on term weighting algorithm based on information entropy theory , 2013 .

[41]  A. Gabus,et al.  World Problems, An Invitation to Further Thought within the Framework of DEMATEL , 1972 .

[42]  Ramin Sadeghian,et al.  A decision support system based on artificial neural network and fuzzy analytic network process for selection of machine tools in a flexible manufacturing system , 2016 .

[43]  Tao Wu,et al.  An energy-responsive optimization method for machine tool selection and operation sequence in flexible machining job shops , 2015 .

[44]  Dragan Pamuar,et al.  Novel approach to group multi-criteria decision making based on interval rough numbers , 2017 .

[45]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR approaches based on TODIM for evaluating internet banking website quality of Ghanaian banking industry , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[46]  Sebnem Yilmaz Balaman,et al.  A novel outranking based multi criteria group decision making methodology integrating ELECTRE and VIKOR under intuitionistic fuzzy environment , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[47]  Julia Szulecka,et al.  Forest plantations in Paraguay: Historical developments and a critical diagnosis in a SWOT-AHP framework , 2017 .

[48]  Krishnendu Shaw,et al.  Evaluation and selection of mobile health (mHealth) applications using AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS , 2019, Technology in Society.

[49]  C. Deng,et al.  Machining process parameters optimization for heavy-duty CNC machine tools in sustainable manufacturing , 2016 .

[50]  Yunna Wu,et al.  Site selection decision framework using fuzzy ANP-VIKOR for large commercial rooftop PV system based on sustainability perspective , 2018, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[51]  Serafim Opricovic,et al.  Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[52]  Hokey Min,et al.  Optimal machine tools selection using quality function deployment and fuzzy multiple objective decision making approach , 2013, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[53]  Metin Dagdeviren,et al.  Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE , 2008, J. Intell. Manuf..

[54]  Craig Standing,et al.  Critical success factors of sustainable project management in construction: A fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP approach , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[55]  Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  A novel 0-1 linear integer programming model for dynamic machine-tool selection and operation allocation in a flexible manufacturing system , 2012 .

[56]  Vipul Jain,et al.  An integrated approach for machine tool selection using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and grey relational analysis , 2012 .

[57]  Huiru Zhao,et al.  Evaluating the comprehensive benefit of eco-industrial parks by employing multi-criteria decision making approach for circular economy , 2017 .

[58]  Gülfem Tuzkaya,et al.  A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Machine Tool Selection Problem in a Fuzzy Environment , 2011 .

[59]  Layek Abdel-Malek,et al.  Algorithm based decision support system for the concerted selection of equipment in machining/assembly cells , 2000 .

[60]  Thomas L. Saaty What is the analytic hierarchy process , 1988 .

[61]  Joo Hyun Moon,et al.  Application of fuzzy decision making method to the evaluation of spent fuel storage options , 2001 .

[62]  Soumava Boral,et al.  An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA , 2020, Engineering Failure Analysis.

[63]  Azmi Mohd Shariff,et al.  Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)-entropy Methodology for Inherent Safety Design Decision Making Tool☆ , 2016 .

[64]  Huiru Zhao,et al.  External Benefit Evaluation of Renewable Energy Power in China for Sustainability , 2015 .

[65]  M. Yurdakul,et al.  Analysis of the benefit generated by using fuzzy numbers in a TOPSIS model developed for machine tool selection problems , 2009 .

[66]  L. Suganthi,et al.  Multi expert and multi criteria evaluation of sectoral investments for sustainable development: An integrated fuzzy AHP, VIKOR / DEA methodology , 2018, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[67]  Mohammad Jafar Tarokh,et al.  A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[68]  Zahari Taha,et al.  A fuzzy AHP–ANN-based decision support system for machine tool selection in a flexible manufacturing cell , 2011 .

[69]  Ahmad Jafarnejad Chaghooshi,et al.  A fuzzy hybrid approach for project manager selection , 2016 .

[70]  John G. Breslin,et al.  Big data and stream processing platforms for Industry 4.0 requirements mapping for a predictive maintenance use case , 2020 .

[71]  Huchang Liao,et al.  Integrating interval-valued multi-granular 2-tuple linguistic BWM-CODAS approach with target-based attributes: Site selection for a construction project , 2020, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[72]  Yan-bin Du,et al.  Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis of remanufactured machine tools in service , 2017 .

[73]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Decision making in machine tool selection: An integrated approach with SWARA and COPRAS-G methods , 2013 .

[74]  Jhareswar Maiti,et al.  Human error identification and risk prioritization in overhead crane operations using HTA, SHERPA and fuzzy VIKOR method , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[75]  Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee,et al.  A NEW COMBINATIVE DISTANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT(CODAS) METHOD FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING , 2016 .

[76]  Dragan Pamucar,et al.  A New Model for Determining Weight Coefficients of Criteria in MCDM Models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM) , 2018, Symmetry.

[77]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[78]  Zahari Taha,et al.  A hybrid fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE decision support system for machine tool selection in flexible manufacturing cell , 2011, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[79]  Han Song,et al.  Inverse Finite Element Method for Reconstruction of Deformation in the Gantry Structure of Heavy-Duty Machine Tool Using FBG Sensors , 2018, Sensors.

[80]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A New Hybrid MCDM Model: Sustainable Supplier Selection in a Construction Company , 2019, Symmetry.

[81]  Selin Soner Kara,et al.  A hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach to machine tool selection , 2008, J. Intell. Manuf..

[82]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Decision making on business issues with foresight perspective; an application of new hybrid MCDM model in shopping mall locating , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..