Investigating the impact of discrete-return lidar point density on estimations of mean and dominant plot-level tree height in Eucalyptus grandis plantations

The accuracy of lidar remote sensing in characterizing three-dimensional forest structural attributes has encouraged foresters to integrate lidar approaches in routine inventories. However, lidar point density is an important consideration when assessing forest biophysical parameters, given the direct relationship between higher spatial resolution and lidar acquisition and processing costs. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of point density on mean and dominant tree height estimates at plot level. The study was conducted in an intensively managed Eucalyptus grandis plantation. High point density (eight points/m2) discrete-return, small-footprint lidar data were used to generate point density simulations averaging 0.25, one, two, three, four, five, and six points/m2. Field surveyed plot-level mean and dominant heights were regressed against metrics derived from lidar data at each simulated point density. Stepwise regression was used to identify which lidar metrics produced the best models. Mean height was estimated at accuracy of R2 ranging between 0.93 and 0.94 while dominant height was estimated with an R2 of 0.95. Root mean square error (RMSE) was also similar at all densities for mean height (∼1.0 m) and dominant height (∼1.2 m); the relative RMSE compared to field-measured mean was constant at approximately 5%. Analysis of bias showed that the estimation of both variables did not vary with density. The results indicated that all lidar point densities resulted in reliable models. It was concluded that plot-level height can be estimated with reliable accuracy using relatively low density lidar point spacing. Additional research is required to investigate the effect of low point density on estimation of other forest biophysical attributes.

[1]  E. Næsset,et al.  Estimating tree height and tree crown properties using airborne scanning laser in a boreal nature reserve , 2002 .

[2]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[3]  F. Ackermann Airborne laser scanning : present status and future expectations , 1999 .

[4]  W. W. Carson,et al.  Accuracy of a high-resolution lidar terrain model under a conifer forest canopy , 2003 .

[5]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas , 1999 .

[6]  P. Treitz,et al.  Mapping stand-level forest biophysical variables for a mixedwood boreal forest using lidar: an examination of scanning density , 2006 .

[7]  D. Roberts,et al.  Small-footprint lidar estimation of sub-canopy elevation and tree height in a tropical rain forest landscape , 2004 .

[8]  E. Næsset Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[9]  R. Webster,et al.  Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information systems , 1990, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[10]  M. Flood,et al.  LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure , 2003 .

[11]  E. Næsset,et al.  Laser scanning of forest resources: the nordic experience , 2004 .

[12]  R. Nelson Modeling forest canopy heights: The effects of canopy shape , 1997 .

[13]  J. Means,et al.  Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning lidar , 2000 .

[14]  Oscar García,et al.  Estimating top height with variable plot sizes , 1998 .

[15]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Simulation study for finding optimal lidar acquisition parameters for forest height retrieval , 2005 .

[16]  Randolph H. Wynne,et al.  Estimating plot-level tree heights with lidar : local filtering with a canopy-height based variable window size , 2002 .

[17]  Martin Flood,et al.  Laser altimetry : From science to commercial lidar mapping , 2001 .

[18]  S. Reutebuch,et al.  Light detection and ranging (LIDAR): an emerging tool for multiple resource inventory. , 2005 .

[19]  David M. Allen,et al.  The Relationship Between Variable Selection and Data Agumentation and a Method for Prediction , 1974 .

[20]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Effects of different flying altitudes on biophysical stand properties estimated from canopy height and density measured with a small-footprint airborne scanning laser , 2004 .

[21]  Håkan Olsson,et al.  Simulating the effects of lidar scanning angle for estimation of mean tree height and canopy closure , 2003 .

[22]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Forestry , 2000, Journal of Forestry.

[23]  S. Magnussen,et al.  Derivations of stand heights from airborne laser scanner data with canopy-based quantile estimators , 1998 .

[24]  J. Holmgren Prediction of tree height, basal area and stem volume in forest stands using airborne laser scanning , 2004 .

[25]  Robert A. Monserud,et al.  An evaluation of diagnostic tests and their roles in validating forest biometric models , 2004 .

[26]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Assessment of forest structure with airborne LiDAR and the effects of platform altitude , 2006 .

[27]  A. Kozak,et al.  Does cross validation provide additional information in the evaluation of regression models , 2003 .

[28]  E. Næsset Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data , 1997 .

[29]  Johan E. S. Fransson,et al.  Effects on estimation accuracy of forest variables using different pulse density of laser data , 2007 .

[30]  Aloysius Wehr,et al.  Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview , 1999 .

[31]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning , 1999 .