An Empirical Investigation in Sustaining High-Quality Performance

Many organizations that were once quality leaders have had challenges sustaining high-quality performance. Although research has examined frameworks and concepts that lead to high-quality performance, few studies examine how to sustain high-quality performance. Sustaining performance may require additional capabilities from what it takes to achieve it. Drawing on quality management literature, organizational resilience literature, and the theory of dynamic capabilities in the strategy literature, this study empirically investigates the effects of four capabilities that help sustain high-quality performance. The analysis shows that capabilities in improvement, innovation, sensing weak signals, and responsiveness all help sustain high-quality performance. This suggests that what it takes to achieve high-quality performance is different, in part, from what it takes to sustain it. The data comes from a survey of 147 manufacturing business units. The analysis shows that the relative benefits of these capabilities may depend on the level of competitive intensity and environmental uncertainty. The findings provide empirical support for a theoretical model and practical guidance for sustaining quality performance. [web URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12210/full]

[1]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  The moderating role of contextual factors on quality management practices , 2012 .

[2]  Xingxing Zu,et al.  The evolving theory of quality management: The role of Six Sigma , 2008 .

[3]  Liisa Välikangas,et al.  The quest for resilience. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[4]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Microeconometrics Using Stata , 2009 .

[5]  J. Dean,et al.  MANAGEMENT THEORY AND TOTAL QUALITY: IMPROVING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE THROUGH THEORY DEVELOPMENT , 1994 .

[6]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Listening to the Customer -The Concept of a Service-Quality Information System , 1997 .

[7]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[8]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[9]  M. Tushman,et al.  The ambidextrous organization. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[10]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: resilient performance in an age of uncertainty, second edition , 2007 .

[11]  Morgan Swink,et al.  Core manufacturing capabilities and their links to product differentiation , 1998 .

[12]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[13]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND AN ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT , 1994 .

[14]  Nofal Nagles García.  Reseña de "Dynamic capabilities. Understanding strategic change in organizations" de Constance E. Helfat, Sydney Finkelstein, Will Mitchell, Margareth Peteraf, Harbir Singh, David J. Teece, Sidney Winter , 2010 .

[15]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Transformation as Punctuated Equilibrium: An Empirical Test , 1994 .

[16]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[17]  Soo Wook Kim,et al.  An exploratory study of manufacturing practice and performance interrelationships: Implications for capability progression , 2005 .

[18]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[20]  R. Schroeder,et al.  Antecedents to ambidexterity competency in high technology organizations , 2012 .

[21]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[22]  Dongli Zhang,et al.  Customizing Quality Management Practices: A Conceptual and Measurement Framework , 2014, Decis. Sci..

[23]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[24]  S. Sitkin,et al.  DISTINGUISHING CONTROL FROM LEARNING IN TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT: A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE , 1994 .

[25]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[26]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Innovating Mindfully with Information Technology , 2004, MIS Q..

[27]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[28]  Paul R. Schulman,et al.  The Negotiated Order of Organizational Reliability , 1993 .

[29]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[30]  M. Porter.  Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[31]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[32]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[33]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Linking Routines to Operations Capabilities: A New Perspective , 2008 .

[34]  Carrie R. Leana,et al.  Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices , 1999 .

[35]  Hale Kaynak,et al.  The relationship between total quality management: practices and their effects on firm performance , 2003 .

[36]  Moshe Farjoun.  Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality , 2010 .

[37]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[38]  B. Muthén,et al.  Applying Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Models for Continuous Outcomes to Likert Scale Data Complicates Meaningful Group Comparisons , 2004 .

[39]  Daniel A. Levinthal.  Random Walks and Organizational Mortality , 1991 .

[40]  Claus Rerup,et al.  Attentional Triangulation: Learning from Unexpected Rare Crises , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[41]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[42]  S. T. Foster,et al.  Towards an understanding of supply chain quality management , 2008 .

[43]  Sophia Rabe-Hesketh,et al.  Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. 2nd edition , 2008 .

[44]  A. Meyer,et al.  Lasting Improvements in Manufacturing Performance: In Search of a New Theory , 1990 .

[45]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[46]  J. Hackman,et al.  Total Quality Management: Empirical, Conceptual, and Practical Issues , 1995 .

[47]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A comparative case study of sustaining quality as a competitive advantage , 2014 .

[48]  S. Ahire,et al.  The role of top management commitment in quality management: an empirical analysis of the auto parts industry , 1998 .

[49]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Formative versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration , 2006 .

[50]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  Operational Capabilities: The Secret Ingredient , 2010, Decis. Sci..

[51]  T. C. Powell.  Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[52]  J. Dutton,et al.  Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational Action , 1987 .

[53]  Hale Kaynak,et al.  A replication and extension of quality management into the supply chain , 2008 .

[54]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  The Impact of Quality Management Practices on Performance and Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[55]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[56]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[57]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Understanding Responses to Supply Chain Disruptions: Insights from Information Processing and Resource Dependence Perspectives , 2011 .

[58]  Shawnee K. Vickery,et al.  A Theory of Production Competence Revisited , 1991 .

[59]  Tammy E. Beck,et al.  Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management , 2011, Human Resource Management Review.

[60]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[61]  K. Roberts.  Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization , 1990 .

[62]  M. Malhotra,et al.  Defining the concept of supply chain quality management and its relevance to academic and industrial practice , 2005 .

[63]  Andrew P. Knight,et al.  Measuring Collective Mindfulness and Exploring Its Nomological Network , 2004 .

[64]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  TQM across multiple countries: Convergence hypothesis versus national specificity arguments , 2005 .

[65]  T. L. Porte.  High Reliability Organizations: Unlikely, Demanding and At Risk , 1996 .

[66]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[67]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[68]  R. Bagozzi.  Advanced Methods of Marketing Research , 1994 .

[69]  Timothy J. Vogus,et al.  In search of mechanisms: How do HR practices affect organizational performance? , 2004 .

[70]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[71]  John V. Petrocelli,et al.  Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development V Hierarchical Multiple Regression in Counseling Research: Common Problems and Possible Remedies , 2022 .

[72]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  The effects of organizational context on quality management: An empirical investigation , 1991 .

[73]  Gianmario Verona,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities Deconstructed: A Bibliographic Investigation into the Origins, Development, and Future Directions of the Research Domain , 2010 .

[74]  T. Douglas,et al.  Total Quality Management Implementation and Competitive Advantage: The Role of Structural Control and Exploration , 2001 .

[75]  Hung Chung Su,et al.  Unpacking the relationships between learning mechanisms, culture types, and plant performance , 2013 .

[76]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[77]  Joshua L. Ray,et al.  Organizational Mindfulness in Business Schools , 2011 .

[78]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The age of temporary advantage , 2010 .

[79]  Judith M. Whipple,et al.  Global supply chain design considerations: Mitigating product safety and security risks , 2011 .

[80]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[81]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[82]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Contingency research in operations management practices , 2008 .