Eco-efficiency optimization for municipal solid waste management

Abstract Carbon emission from municipal solid waste (MSW) treatment is one of the anthropogenic sources to cause climate change, which accounts for 3–5% of global greenhouse gas emissions according to the report of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). At the same time, the gases and liquid discharged from MSW treatment can also cause other environmental impacts, such as climate change, photochemical ozone synthesis, and acidification, especially in huge city with huge population as Beijing, China. This paper proposed an eco-efficiency analysis method, which aimed to yield maximum overall environmental improvement per unit investment cost during its life cycle processing. This method took the overall reduction in the environmental impact of MSW treatment using cost-effective techniques as the objective to optimize waste disposal systems. The separation ratio during MSW collection and the proportion of techniques used for treatment were the major indicators for optimization measures. For Beijing, an increase in the waste separation ratio during collection proved to be the most effective measure, with an eco-efficiency score of 0.144. Adjustment of the proportion of treatment techniques used was less eco-efficient, with an increase in the proportion of composting being the most effective approach. Based on real needs, the objective should be to reduce the proportion of landfills used and increase the amount of composting and incineration. This optimization measure had the lowest cost and an eco-efficiency score of 0.0461, which is 60% higher than that for the measure with the lowest eco-efficiency.

[1]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Measuring Eco‐efficiency of Production with Data Envelopment Analysis , 2005 .

[2]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management with regard to greenhouse gas emissions: case study of Tianjin, China. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Assessing the Eco‐efficiency of End‐of‐Pipe Technologies with the Environmental Cost Efficiency Indicator , 2005 .

[4]  Helge Brattebø,et al.  Eco-efficiency in Recycling Systems: Evaluation Methods & Case Studies for Plastic Packaging , 2002 .

[5]  Guohe Huang,et al.  Identification of optimal plans for municipal solid waste management in an environment of fuzziness and two-layer randomness , 2010 .

[6]  Jacqueline Cramer Early warning: Integrating eco‐efficiency aspects into the product development process , 2000 .

[7]  Helmut Yabar,et al.  Eco‐efficiency of Advanced Loop‐closing Systems for Vehicles and Household Appliances in Hyogo Eco‐town , 2005 .

[8]  Naciones Unidas. Programa para el Medio Ambiente Waste and Climate Change - Global Trends and Strategy Framework , 2010 .

[9]  G. Huppes,et al.  A Framework for Quantified Eco‐efficiency Analysis , 2005 .

[10]  Kun-Mo Lee,et al.  Eco‐efficiency for Pollution Prevention in Small to Medium‐Sized Enterprises: A Case from South Korea , 2005 .

[11]  M. Meier Eco-efficiency evaluation of waste gas purification systems in the chemical industry , 1997 .

[12]  L Yerushalmi,et al.  Estimation of greenhouse gas generation in wastewater treatment plants--model development and application. , 2010, Chemosphere.

[13]  R. Bohne,et al.  Dynamic Eco-Efficiency Projections for Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Strategies at the City Level , 2008 .

[14]  Paolo S Calabrò,et al.  Greenhouse gases emission from municipal waste management: The role of separate collection. , 2009, Waste management.

[15]  B. Bakshi,et al.  Emergy analysis using US economic input–output models with applications to life cycles of gasoline and corn ethanol , 2010 .